similar to: where to look for file reconstruction

Hello Everyone, I have been reading the rsync code for the past few days and Iam finding it hard to understand how the file list works. The info that I am looking for is - "Are the files processed in the same order in both the receiver and generator processes?". Thanx in advance for all the replies. zahed. -- View this message in context:

Hey everyone, I am a final semester MCA student. I've chosen rsync as the subject of my project for my graduation. Hence I would appreciate it if someone could guide me with some ideas on how I can contribute to rsync. I will work hard to implement whatever suggestions that you can all give me. I would definitely like to know what are some of the issues concerning rsync. May be I can then

Attached is a patch that makes window strides constant when files are walked with a constant block size. In these cases, it completely avoids all memmoves. In my simple local test of rsyncing 57MB of 10 local files, memmoved bytes went from 18MB to zero. I haven't tested this for a big variety of file cases. I think that this will always reduce the memmoves involved with walking a large

I realized that I may not have answered the question you were asking and that no one else has responded. I can across a similar problem and may have an answer to your question now. If you have both the wavelet coefficients and the scaling coefficients then create a fake sequence of the same length as the original and decompose that sequence using wd form wavethersh with the same wavelet family

Hi all, As a molecular biologist by training, I'm fairly new to R (and statistics!), and was hoping for some advice. First of all, I'd like to apologise if my question is more methodological rather than relating to a specific R function. I've done my best to search both in the forum and elsewhere but can't seem to find an answer which works in practice. I am carrying out

Dear all: Greetings from Mumbai, India. Reference?R help solution [Rogerio, Thu 16 Nov 2006 - 20:54:25 GMT]. Simonsen, Jensen and Johansen (2002) [arXiv:cond-mat/0202352v1] note "(.wavelet filtered was...) achieved?by first transforming the log-price [...] to the?wavelet-domain, setting all wavelet coefficient corresponding?to scales larger then 1000 trading days to zero, and finally

Greetings, I'd like to propose a new option to rsync, which causes it to read device files as if they were regular files. This includes pipes, character devices and block devices (I'm not sure about sockets). The main motivation is cases where you need to synchronize a large amount of data that is not available as regular files, as in the following scenarios: * Keep a copy of a block

Hi all, I need help with a little issue. Is it possible to update the sum(in receive_data) using the checksum of the block rather than the data itself?. thanks and regards, zahed -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Issue-with-Sum-update-tp17223957p17223957.html Sent from the Samba - rsync mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

> On Apr 23, 2018, at 10:49 AM, WK <wkmail at bneit.com> wrote: > > From some old May 2017 email. I asked the following: > "From the docs, I see you can identify the shards by the GFID > # getfattr -d -m. -e hex path_to_file > # ls /bricks/*/.shard -lh | grep GFID > > Is there a gluster tool/script that will recreate the file? > > or can you just sort

I'm trying to use the randomTF function from package palaeoSig to test the significance of a MAT reconstruction with nine analogs and a WA-PLS reconstruction with four components. I'm probably missing something obvious here but how do I make sure that randomTF is testing the reconstruction based on the desired number of analogs / components? In: fitmap.wapls = WAPLS( lumapspc,

Hi again, I measured my fragment reconstructions against the compiler output from GCC and well - the new codes perform better, so I brushed up my gcc inline assembler skills and made a port. Code is here: http://torus.untergrund.net/code/mmxfrag.c All routines perform much better now. Inter2 alone got a speedup of factor 5 on Pentium-M. Athlon CPU's execute roughly 3 times faster.

Hi, im having this on my screen and dmesg im not sure if this is an error message. btw im using centos 4.4 with 2 x 200GB PATA drives. md: md0: sync done. RAID1 conf printout: --- wd:2 rd:2 disk 0, wo:0, o:1, dev:hda2 disk 1, wo:0, o:1, dev:hdc2 md: delaying resync of md5 until md3 has finished resync (they share one or more physical units) md: syncing RAID array md5 md: minimum _guaranteed_

Hi List, What this means? md: syncing RAID array md0 md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 1000 KB/sec/disc. md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth (but not more than 200000 KB/sec) for reconstruction. md: using 128k window, over a total of 2096384 blocks. md: md0: sync done. RAID1 conf printout: --- wd:2 rd:2 disk 0, wo:0, o:1, dev:sda2 disk 1, wo:0, o:1, dev:sdb2 sd 0:0:0:0:

Hi, I recently came across a situation where "rsync --inplace" performs very poorly. If both the source and destination files contain long sequences of identical blocks, but not necessarily in the same location, the sender can spend an inordinate amount of CPU time finding matching blocks. In my case, I came across this problem while backing up multi-hundred-gigabyte MySQL database

Hello all, I have some trouble in reconstructing a valid expression within a function, here is my question. I am building a function : SUB<-function(DF,subset=TRUE) { #where DF is a data frame, with Var1, Var2, Fact1, Fact2, Fact3 #and subset would be an expression, eg. Fact3 == 1 #in a first time I want to build a subset from DF #I managed to, with an expression like eg. DF$Fact3, # but I

Short question: is there way to tell EM to actually send data after send_data call? I''m building a file transferring app. I send Mashal.dump''ed metadata first, and then - the file contents (chunked). I found a silly bug: receive_data() gets marshalled metadata and the first chunk of the file in a single variable. Like that: c1.send_data("meta")

I am using eventmachine 0.8.1 on windows XP and am having very odd problems. This snippet of code gives the error that follows it. class EchoServer def receive_data data puts data send_data ">>>you sent: #{data}" if data =~ /quit/i puts "quitting" close_connection EventMachine::stop_event_loop end end end

Hello, First of all I''m new to working with sockets, so the problems I''m having are probably because of my lack of understanding. What I''m trying to accomplish is to create a mac os x client gui to ruby-debug. When a application that includes ruby-debug is started, it starts listening for 2 connections; 8989, 8990 The connection is made by calling the connectToApp

this has never happened to me before, and I'm somewhat at a loss. got a email from the cron thing... /etc/cron.weekly/99-raid-check: WARNING: mismatch_cnt is not 0 on /dev/md10 WARNING: mismatch_cnt is not 0 on /dev/md11 ok, md10 and md11 are each raid1's made from 2 x 72GB scsi drives, on a dell 2850 or something dual single-core 3ghz server. these two md's are in

Hi people, As I said before: I did the IDCT to run on the FPGA. My friends from university did the Reconstruction routines running on the FPGA. I'm helping with the LoopFilter, and it is almost there. (all VHDL) I did a small profiling of the libTheora running on a Altera Stratix II device: The processor used was the NIOS II with 8Kb of data and instruction cache, branch prediction and