similar to: sync append only file

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40000 matches similar to: "sync append only file"

2007 Sep 18
2
rsync daemon troubleshooting
Hi all: I tried to start a rsync daemon under my user name (not an administrator) on debian linux box(linux kernel 2.4.27), and failed. The command I used is > rsync -v -v --daemon --config=rsyncd.conf This command returns without any error although the daemon does not get started. The rsyncd.conf I used is as follows. Do I miss anything in the configuration file? Any help is appreciated.
2008 Feb 16
3
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [receiver]
Hi all: I am trying to transfer a file from a machine A to a machine B. I ran a rsync deamon on machine B at a given port. Because there is a firewall between these two machines, I opened the port on the firewall. Is this enough to get rsync work through firewall? When I tried the transfer, I got the following error messages. my command: rsync -a --copy-links localfile rsync:://me@<my
2008 Jan 25
2
rsyncd performance when handling multiple clients in parallel
Hi: I use rsync to transfer multiple files from several clients to a server in parallel. I am wondering how many concurrent connections the server should handle to maximize the throughput (number of bytes written to server). In an extreme case, if only one connection allowed, the disk IO speed of server will not be fully utilized. On the other hand, if the server allows too many connections, the
2012 Jun 08
3
[Bug 8990] New: --append-verify doesn't spot file differences, even with --checksum
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8990 Summary: --append-verify doesn't spot file differences, even with --checksum Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
2012 Dec 14
1
[Bridge] [PATCH] bridge: Bug fix for incorrect interpretation of MLDv2 maximum response code
This patch fixes the incorrect interpretation of endianness of MLDv2 maximum response code within bridge's multicast snooping code. Signed-off-by: Ang Way Chuang <wcang at sfc.wide.ad.jp> --- diff --git a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c index 977c3ee..29c6283 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_multicast.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_multicast.c @@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ static int
2018 May 08
4
[Bug 13423] New: Checksum option does not work as expected when append-verify is used
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13423 Bug ID: 13423 Summary: Checksum option does not work as expected when append-verify is used Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core
2007 May 19
1
rsync --append behavior
I am using rsync 2.6.9 in daemon mode under Cygwin, and having trouble reconciling its --append behavior with that described in the man page: The man page says that when you use --append, it will update a file by appending, which presumes the existing data on the receiving side matches. But when I run rsync with append mode when the existing file on the receiving side is shorter than on the
2007 Aug 01
2
--append option description in manpage confusing
[ see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=426191 ] The text in the description of the --append option may lead one to believe that files that are shorter on the receiving side won't be updated, due to the following text: ... Only files on the receiving side that are shorter than the corresponding file on the sending side (as well as new files) are sent. ... IMHO
2014 Dec 16
1
Behaviour of --append with modified files
We have a rsync'd filesystem which generally contains very large files that only grow. We've specifically used the --append option to handle these files - since otherwise rsync is effectively CPU bound the whole time. I'd always assumed that any files that were simply modified (without a change in length) would be handled under the existing rsync logic. However it appears that
2016 Mar 18
4
Redundant load in llvm's codegen compares to gcc when accessing escaped pointer?
1. Same question as David, why &c - 8 is invalid? Is it related to below statements In C99 standard? 6.5.3.3: "Among the invalid values for dereferencing a pointer by the unary * operator are a null pointer, an address inappropriately aligned for the type of object pointed to, and the address of an object after the end of its lifetime." 2. We are trying to preserve 1st load and
2008 Mar 11
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5318] New: Rsync assertion in check_prior() when using --append
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5318 Summary: Rsync assertion in check_prior() when using --append Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:
2008 Dec 16
6
logging mechanism in rsync
Hi Friends, Does rsync V3 has the feature for logging the files which have not been transferred? Its already logs the file which have been transfered. Thanks, Jignesh -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
2016 Mar 18
3
Redundant load in llvm's codegen compares to gcc when accessing escaped pointer?
On 2016.03.17 at 16:35 -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On Mar 15, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Chuang-Yu Cheng via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Please look at this c code: > > > > typedef struct _PB { > > void* data; /* required.*/ > > int f1_; > > float f2_; > > } PB;
2006 Jul 06
3
Max number of files to transfer
Hey, Is it possible to make rsync only transfer a maximum amount of files at one time. I want to do this to make the initial set up time of the filelist before transfer to be reasonably predictable. Rsync is basically going to transfer from one mailbox to another mailbox but I want to be able to only transfer say 50 files at a time. I know this can be solved by controlling the number of
2006 Jul 06
3
Max number of files to transfer
Hey, Is it possible to make rsync only transfer a maximum amount of files at one time. I want to do this to make the initial set up time of the filelist before transfer to be reasonably predictable. Rsync is basically going to transfer from one mailbox to another mailbox but I want to be able to only transfer say 50 files at a time. I know this can be solved by controlling the number of
2007 Jan 20
1
Typos in man page
Dear rsync people, I found four of what I believe to be typos in the rsync man page in CVS. The attached patch fixes them. Matt -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: man-typos.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 2172 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20070119/afe0d18d/man-typos.bin
2009 Jan 24
2
rsync with --copy-devices patch and device-target with --write-batch doesnt work
Hi List! I want to use rsync to create differential backups of my lvm-snapshots. fullbackup-filename: /mnt/sdc1/snapshotvergleich/rootbackup1.img current snapshot: /dev/vg0/rootbackup note: compiled-in --copy-devices-patch root@xp8main3:/usr/local/src/rsync# ./rsync --version rsync version 3.1.0dev protocol version 31.PR5 Copyright (C) 1996-2009 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and
2000 Feb 25
2
problem with read.table
> Hi, > I recently downloaded R on window and running Rgui on NT. I have never use > R before and trying to learn R by following An introduction to R. > I generated a table of 900x5 in excel and saved as tab delimited txt file. > I then do read.table but I keeping getting the following message > > data <- read.table("ML4mm25.txt", header=T, sep=" ")
2016 Mar 19
2
Redundant load in llvm's codegen compares to gcc when accessing escaped pointer?
Agree, and I did : ) Please refer to this mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-03/msg00179.html On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > I suspect you should just go ask #1 on the gcc mailing list and see what > the answer is. > We are basically trying to figure out their reasoning, but we should > instead just go ask what it is
2006 Aug 30
3
Damaged source medium during rsync
What happens when rsync'ing a file that is damaged bacause of a bad sector on the source medium? I assume that the file will be synchronized partially, overwriting any file of the same name on the destination medium. If that is the case, is there a way to make rsync check readability of files before overwriting them on the target medium (e.g. by synching to a temp. file and, once