similar to: Rsync 3.0.0pre4 errors with ACLs and Xattrs between OSX and Linux

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Rsync 3.0.0pre4 errors with ACLs and Xattrs between OSX and Linux"

2014 Feb 02
1
Bugg when using Extended Attributes flag -X
Hello, I found that using rsync on OS X can give some problems when it comes to Extended Attributes (-X flag). The server I use has Ubuntu with the filesystem XFS and I am trying to backup a OS X system to it. The problem is as far as I understand it that Linux Kernel has a liming on 64k f?r Extended Attributes and OS X don?t have this limit. Some error output. rsync: rsync_xal_set:
2020 May 12
1
[Bug 14377] New: rsync rsync_xal_set lsetxattr failed invalid argument
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14377 Bug ID: 14377 Summary: rsync rsync_xal_set lsetxattr failed invalid argument Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net
2007 Mar 31
2
xattrs problems on Mac OSX with resource forks
I am using the latest 3.0.0cvs protocol version 30 Capabilities: 64- bit files, 32-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, no ACLs, xattrs xattrs cvs 1.77 I installed xattr for Mac OSX Senario: $ mkdir /Users/alan/Desktop/folder1 $ echo 'Hello' > /Users/alan/Desktop/folder1/file1 $ xattr --set color blue
2025 Jan 12
2
question about --link-dest and the rsync protocol
Hi Kevin, Thanks for your quick response. The rsyncd.conf file looks like: charset = utf-8 [user] path = /c/user comment = "" use chroot = true uid = root gid = root read only = false auth users = admin I'm still confused about how to specify the path. The actual UNIX path is: /c/user/snapshots/rsync_test/last I've tried: --link-dest=snapshots/rsync_test/last
2011 Sep 14
10
[Bug 8456] New: improve --link-dest bahaviour
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8456 Summary: improve --link-dest bahaviour Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: toralf.foerster at gmx.de
2008 Apr 01
12
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5365] New: --backup and --xattrs are not compatible
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5365 Summary: --backup and --xattrs are not compatible Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: fauthier@free.fr
2004 May 20
3
two-way synchronization accross a firewall fails
machine O is outside firewall, machine I is inside (machine names changed to protect the innocent :-) firewall allows ssh connections if inititiated from I to O, but not if the other way. both machines have an /etc/rsyncd.conf of: [rt] path = /tmp/rsync_test comment = Test area O runs rsync daemon, I initiates a rsync cammnad like rsync -rvvv --delete --rsh=ssh O::rt /tmp/rsync_test
2025 Jan 12
1
question about --link-dest and the rsync protocol
Hi all, I'm trying to figure out why a script works when using SSH but not when using the rsync protocol. When I run the following command: rsync -aPh --link-dest=/user/snapshots/rsync_test/last /home/user/rsync_test root at readynas.internal:/user/snapshots/rsync_test/Jan_11_2025 it works perfectly, correctly recognizing the link-dest parameter. However, when I try to run the same command
2025 Jan 12
1
question about --link-dest and the rsync protocol
rsyncd doesn't take unix paths. You must adapt your --link-dest to contend with however the rsycd module is defined in rsyncd.conf. On 1/11/25 9:52 PM, Anthony LaTorre via rsync wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to figure out why a script works when using SSH but not > when using the rsync protocol. When I run the following command: > > rsync -aPh
2025 Jan 12
1
question about --link-dest and the rsync protocol
On Sat 11 Jan 2025, Anthony LaTorre via rsync wrote: > Thanks for your quick response. The rsyncd.conf file looks like: > > charset = utf-8 > [user] > path = /c/user > comment = "" > use chroot = true Note the chroot... So "/" equals /c/user > uid = root > gid = root > read only = false > auth users = admin > > I'm
2001 Oct 18
3
group ownership
I am attempting to rsync data from a rsync server and set the permissions to a different gid on the client: my servers name is "rserver01" my clients name is "rclient01" here is the rysync.conf contained on rserver01: # log file log file = /var/adm/rsync_log # global options for all modules dont compress = *.gz *.tgz *.zip *.z *.rpm *.deb *.iso *.bz2 *.tbz uid = nobody
2015 Mar 11
4
vfs_fruit: xattr imcompatible with netatalk
Hi. I'm testing samba 4.2.0 vfs_fruit on Fedora Server 22-alpha. I confirmed that ResourceFork and FinderInfo are compatible with Netatalk 3.1.7. However, EAs are incompatible. The character ":" in EA name is wrong. The EAs are not seen from clients. smb.conf: [test2] path = /export/test2 writable = yes vfs objects = catia fruit streams_xattr fruit:locking =
2008 Feb 12
3
Rsync to a Read Only file system
I think your product is awesome, but I am experiencing an unexpected behaviour. $ rsync -avviPH /Users/alan/Desktop/rsync_test\ Folder/ root@slug::Downloads opening tcp connection to slug port 873 sending daemon args: --server -vvlHogDtpre30.16i "--log-format=%i" -- partial . Downloads sending incremental file list .d..t..g... ./ rsync: failed to write xattr user.rsync.%stat for
2015 Mar 11
0
vfs_fruit: xattr imcompatible with netatalk
Hi HAT! Nice to meet you over here... ;) On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:30:45PM +0900, HAT wrote: > Hi. > I'm testing samba 4.2.0 vfs_fruit on Fedora Server 22-alpha. > I confirmed that ResourceFork and FinderInfo are compatible with > Netatalk 3.1.7. However, EAs are incompatible. > The character ":" in EA name is wrong. > The EAs are not seen from clients. >
2016 Jan 09
2
vfs_fruit: FreeBSD: attrname is wrong
In case of FreeBSD, the name of the extended attribute is wrong. % lsextattr user ICONandEA.txt ICONandEA.txt netatalk.Metadata com.apple.TextEncoding com.apple.metadata:kMDItemFinderComment "netatalk.Metadata" is incompatible to Netatalk. The first atom "org." is removed. source3/include/smb.h: /* Prefix for DosStreams in the vfs_streams_xattr module */ #define
2003 Jul 23
1
SIGCHLD SIG_IGN, then wait - warning messages
Rsync maintainers please review rsync bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98740 The code in question is in socket.c in start_accept_loop. The user is getting these warning messages:
2008 Jun 22
3
Xattrs and Delete over AFP
Hello group, I have an OSX 10.3.9 Server that I'm trying to back up with rsync 3.0.2. Since I didn't have any luck with the 10.3.9 patch and I do have 10.4 clients, I decided to try running the backup over AFP (Apple's file sharing protocol). I found a way to mount the AFP volume with root permissions and rsync 3.0.2 works very nicely using this on the 10.4 clients, preserving
2003 Aug 22
1
rsync daemon and secrets file
I'm trying to understand how to properly setup the /etc/rsyncd.conf file to run an rsync daemon with a secrets file specified in a module - the rsync.conf manpage does not spell it out clearly enough. Rsync server is rsync-2.5.6. If this is my /etc/rsyncd.conf file: ------------------------------------ log file = /var/log/rsync uid = root gid = root [test] uid = rsync1 gid =
2004 Dec 01
1
rsync transfers whole content when a new hardlink is created
Hi, I detected a silly behaviour of rsync when new hardlinks of already synced files are created: Scenario: There are a local directory and a equal remote directory created by former run of rsync. Create a hardlink from a already existing file (both inside the local directory). If this hardlink has a filename with comes before the original filename when both are sorted in alphabetic order,
2007 Apr 07
2
xattrs questions
I see that rsync will eventually support extended attributes, which will be great. But: will it allow backup from a file system that supports xattrs, to one that does not? For this to work, rsync would have to represent the xattrs on the destination machine in some special format, I suppose, which is outside the usual rsync mode of operation. Moreover, even if both machines support