similar to: 3.0.0pre2: bookend breakage (2 different errors)

On 10/15/07, Erik Jan Tromp <betageek@sympatico.ca> wrote: > # The second error > Invalid file index: -101 (-1 - 0) with iflags 0 [receiver] > rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at rsync.c(273) [receiver=3.0.0pre2] > rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (21 bytes received so far) [generator] > rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(596)

Just a quick heads up to say I'm still getting this (reproducable) error while doing daily backups: rsync: generator.c:1872: check_for_finished_files: Assertion `flist != ((void *)0)' failed. rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes [receiver]: Broken pipe (32) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(1500) [receiver=3.0.0pre2] This is with cvs

3.0.0pre2: non-recursive remote listing breakage Looks like pre1's fix broke something else. I noticed this when listing module/directory contents on servers known to be running versions 2.5.7 & 2.6.3. Not having (full) access to them, I replicated the errors using 2 machines on my home lan. # the machines lithium.elements.lan: the client. rsync 3.0.0pre2 for all tests.

Hello, yesterday i posted this issue on snapshot-discuss at listsourceforge.net (subject: wondering why backup wont start), but after reading the FAQ and searching the bugzilla DB i thought it could help to post here as well. i have a problem. But let me first describe my setup. i followed this howto: http://dev.kprod.net/?q=linux-backup-rsnapshot-no-root Now there is a backup server rpi-home

Oak Ridge Associated Universities is seeking a Scientific Programmer/Analyst 2 to support the Occupational Exposure and Worker Health (OEWH) Beryllium Laboratory operation, including a redesign of the current system and incorporation of R routines into the LPT analysis, and also to support the data analysis in the Department of Energy (DOE) Beryllium Registry. This includes expansion of an

Hello guys, sorry for cross-posting, but imho it could be an error in my rsnapshot setup as well as in my rsync setup. If there is a solution on one of these mailing-lists i will post it to the other one as well. ok? here is my question: when running rsnapshot, my exclude filter is being ignored, but i don't see why. grep -v "#" /etc/rsnapshot-debx40.conf | grep . gives

I've been working at this for a few days now and I can't figure out what is broken. Google turns up similar issues from years back, but I hope this is a bug resurfacing. ACL entries are being deleted when files are saved. Here is an example: username: user1 group membership: Domain Users directory: /share/test file: test.xls getfacl /share # file: share # owner: DOMAIN+backupuser #

Hi Roland, Thanks for the reply. Memory usage on both machines seem fine. The server has 4GB's of RAM, of which about 3GB is used during the file list build and about 1.5GB is used during the actual transfer. The client has 16GB of RAM with a peak usage of 8.5GB. I just tried three transfers in a row and it consistently breaks at a certain point, after which I get the "ERROR: out of

Yes, I removed "--no-inc-recursive", without success. -- Best regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Aron Rotteveel 2015-03-27 12:24 GMT+01:00 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Have you tried removing --no-inc-recursive yet? > > On 03/27/2015 07:19 AM, Aron Rotteveel wrote: > > Hi Roland, > > >

I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre2, the second pre-release version for the upcoming 3.0.0 release. Please test this out and email the rsync mailing list with any questions, comments, bug reports, etc. Thanks! You can download the tar file and its signature from here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.0.0pre2.tar.gz http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.0.0pre2.tar.gz.asc

I've just released rsync 3.0.0pre2, the second pre-release version for the upcoming 3.0.0 release. Please test this out and email the rsync mailing list with any questions, comments, bug reports, etc. Thanks! You can download the tar file and its signature from here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.0.0pre2.tar.gz http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.0.0pre2.tar.gz.asc

Hi, I am experiencing segfaults when transferring files via rsync though sudo. Setup: - Backupserver initiates the rsync command with --delete -vvv --no-inc-recursive --numeric-ids --delete-excluded --relative --rsync-path=/home/backupuser/rsync-wrapper.sh - rsync-wrapper.sh (on the client) contains /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/rsync "$@"; - user "backupuser" has sudo access to the

Hey, I'm using rsync to backup my server but there is a problem because rsync is using very huge amounts traffic. But first to the setup. The server I backup has 4GB of data and I use the following command to backup this data. /usr/bin/rsync -aze 'ssh -i /root/.ssh/backup.key -l backupuser' --rsync-path='sudo rsync' --delete --exclude-from=ex.list $SRC $TRG The problem is

Hi. My goal is to use rsync to syncronize box1 and box2. On box2, I have a tapedrive which I write the data I syncronize from box1 every night. On box1, my /etc/rsyncd.conf looks like this: root@box1# cat /etc/rsyncd.conf max connections = 1 syslog facility = local6 [tmp] path = /tmp read only = yes comment = export of /tmp hosts allow = box2 auth users

Hi I use rsync for daily backups from a mailserver. Every day the mailserver pushes backup to the backupserver. Cron runs the command: rsync -q -zrlpt --specials --chmod=Du+rwx \ --rsh 'ssh -F /root/ssh/config -i /root/ssh/private.key -o UserKnownHostsFile=/root/ssh/known_hosts' \ --files-from=/root/include \ --exclude-from=/root/exclude \ --link-dest=../previous \ /

Hello! I have a consistent, reproducable failure performing an rsync of an RHEL4 system running rsync in daemon mode with iptables enabled. With iptables disabled, or with a rule that explicitly allows all traffic, the rsync completes. However, with iptalbes enabled, the rsync starts, but will not finish. It fails after copying a seemingly random amount of data. I have been able to

On 01/04/2023 16:15, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >> >> The problem is, you shouldn't really have Linux groups per se, you >> should have Windows groups that are also Linux groups i.e. everything >> is in AD. > > That's not a great idea. It would mean I'd have to modify every Linux > system. Possibly > And can Linux groups even have a domain let

Hi, is it possible to Restore files deleted with " rm rf " from ext4 or ext3 filesystem by mistake. Regards Ahmad

On 2023-04-01 15:30, William Edwards via samba wrote: >> Op 1 apr. 2023 om 18:53 heeft Gary Dale via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: >> >> ?On 2023-04-01 11:48, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/04/2023 16:15, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >>>>>> The problem is, you shouldn't really have Linux

Just tripped over this one today. $ rsync --no-motd rsync://alphageek.dyndns.org/slackware rsync: link_stat "." (in slackware) failed: No such file or directory (2) rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main.c(1498) [receiver=3.0.1pre2] $ rsync --no-motd rsync://alphageek.dyndns.org/slackware/slackware-current drwxr-xr-x 4096 2008/03/26 01:30:27