similar to: 2.6.9 and timeouts

I have a scenario where I am copying from a local system to remote target and need to remove the local source files once they have been successfully transfered. --remove-source-files works fine for this. An issue has come up in that I need to be able to backup the removed local source files as well. With rsync 2.6.9 I tried: rsync --remove-source-files --backup-dir=/archive –abv (source)

I have 19 servers with this smb.conf share definition working: [export] comment = Exported Files path = /tmp/export guest ok = Yes On the 20th server however, this just doesn't want to work. I've gone through the basics of guest access and permissions more than a few times trying to figure this one out. Approaching this from another angle, I tried the following

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10677 Summary: external zlib broken after update to 3.1.1 on FreeBSD Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x64 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ehaupt at

Dear R-help, I would like to be able to run the following code sequence as a source routine. If I paste it into R via the clipboard it works as expected, but if I source the code instead then the last 3 statements fail. I've also tried writing to the file in place of the sink sequence, but that also hits a snag. R 1.6, w98e2, dfr is a data frame containing the content of Julian

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Nathan Neulinger <nneul at neulinger.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #2 from Nathan Neulinger <nneul

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 04:38:17PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less > efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer > and consumer. > > This patch tries to address this by: > > - introduce a new mode which will be only enabled with IFF_TX_ARRAY > set and switch from sk_receive_queue to a

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12940 Bug ID: 12940 Summary: rsync: -C/--cvs-exclude does not ignore SCM ignore files (patch) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer and consumer. This patch tries to address this by: - switch from sk_receive_queue to a skb_array, and resize it when tx_queue_len was changed. - introduce a new proto_ops peek_len which was used for peeking the skb length. - implement a tun version of peek_len

We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer and consumer. This patch tries to address this by: - introduce a new mode which will be only enabled with IFF_TX_ARRAY set and switch from sk_receive_queue to a fixed size of skb array with 256 entries in this mode. - introduce a new proto_ops peek_len which was

We used to queue tx packets in sk_receive_queue, this is less efficient since it requires spinlocks to synchronize between producer and consumer. This patch tries to address this by: - introduce a new mode which will be only enabled with IFF_TX_ARRAY set and switch from sk_receive_queue to a fixed size of skb array with 256 entries in this mode. - introduce a new proto_ops peek_len which was

We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests

Hi, I just stepped on a strange and very annoying bug in rsync-3.1.0 as shipped with SuSE Linux Enterprise 12, but verified the bug also with rsync-HEAD-20170123. I tried to copy some of my movie collection to a usb disk that our TV could read, so it was formatted with vfat. I forgot that vfat can't handle files > 4 GB, and some of the movies were larger. rsync worked for 3 hours copying

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1791 Summary: using --delete with single directory mirroring doesn't delete files Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests

We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests

We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:05:16PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch introduces a new sock flag - SOCK_XDP. This will be used > for notifying the upper layer that XDP program is attached on the > lower socket, and requires for extra headroom. > > TUN will be the first user. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> In fact vhost is the 1st user,

On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 06:37:57AM -0500, Michael Lueck via samba wrote: > I have Samba shares mounted to my Linux workstation. Mostly I access files on the Samba server over the Samba mount. I use mount.cifs to bring up these mounts. > > For a couple of special cases, I use scp to transfer files between the > server and workstation. Special characters in filenames give sending them

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:13:17AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often > lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do > some batching during rx before submitting them to host network > stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from > sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:13:17AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often > lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do > some batching during rx before submitting them to host network > stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from > sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet