similar to: breakage? when using --ignore-times with --link-dest

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "breakage? when using --ignore-times with --link-dest"

2008 Jul 29
7
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5644] New: Option to recheck basis dirs for existing dest files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5644 Summary: Option to recheck basis dirs for existing dest files Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:
2006 Nov 04
0
ActiveRecord Observers and Model breakage.
I''m attempting to assign ActiveRecord Observers to some of my models, specified in config/environment.rb like so, config.active_record.observers = :presentation_observer, :asset_observer, :tag_observer My models use plugins which extend ActiveRecord::Base, including Sebastian Kanthak''s file_column Attempting to boot mongrel yields:
2004 Oct 20
0
Weird breakage with Roaming Profiles and Quotas
Been playing around with Samba as a domain controller a lot lately, with a rather nice setup. Latest samba and openldap backend, running on hardware SATA raid 5, with for the moment the only shares on XFS /home partition ontop of LVM running XFS quotas. It's all nice and spangley, expect for one thing.. It completely breaks when saving the roaming profile at logoff, and the quota is reached.
2012 Oct 31
0
R_SVN_REVISION breakage on current R trunk.
Hi, src/unix/Rscript.c on R trunk stopped building with a compiler error of "unknown not defined/declared" on line 160-ish, where R_SVN_REVISION is , on my system. I see trunk r60972, trunk r60975 changes R_SVN_REVISION to a number - if it can be found, from being a string. The thing is, I track R development with git's svn support (which IMHO works far better). So svn info cannot
2007 Jan 27
0
[PATCH] dash: Fix "pwd -P" breakage due to getcwd(0, 0) usage
The getpwd() function in dash assumed than getcwd(0, 0) will allocate the buffer dynamically using malloc(); however, this glibc extension is not implemented by klibc. Make getpwd() use a temporary buffer and invoke savestr() itself instead of relying on a nonstandard extension. Signed-off-by: Sergey Vlasov <vsu at altlinux.ru> --- Alternatively, you may pull from the following git repo
2009 Feb 08
0
Possible VFS KPI and KBI breakage on stable/7
There are three sets of changes that would benefit stable/7. Namely, there are 1. Improvements for the UFS unmount or rw->ro remount, that perform suspension during the operation. The changes depend on the the suspension mechanism path, that introduced the suspension owner, and added new VFS OP into the mount method table. This might also fix the hangs with gjournal or
2013 Sep 25
0
strsvis breakage when upgrading to from 9.1 to 9-STABLE
Hello, I've sent a similar query before, but didn't receive any answers. When upgrading from 9.1 to 9-STABLE, the buildworld fails with: ===> usr.bin/xinstall (all) cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/xinstall/../../contrib/mtree -I/usr/src/usr.bin/xinstall/../../lib/libnetbsd -I/usr/src/usr.bin/xinstall/../../lib/libmd -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall
2008 Dec 16
0
Heimdal Breakage
After installing 6.4-RELEASE on my secondary KDC I decided to test the secondary KDC. When trying kinit I get this error: jcw@w17 ~ $ kinit jcw@STRADAMOTORSPORTS.COM's Password: kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Key size is incompatible with encryption type One post on the net says that Heimdal changed the key format to add some padding or somesuch. I haven't gone about fixing the problem
2004 Sep 19
2
klibc compilation breakage on 2.6.8+
hello, klibc/include/signal.h include asm/signal.h which prefixes the __sighandler_t definition with a __user annotation. __user not being defined previously leads to a compilation breakage. It's the only occurrence for now, so the following dirty work-around works here : add a "#define __user" at klibc/include/signal.h head. regards, -- christophe varoqui
2008 Jun 08
0
klibc: Fix breakage with multiple fs specification in mount
Hi, I've already submitted the attached patch to the Debian BTS: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480994 Basically it fixes the argument parsing when running something like "mount -t ext3,ext2...". If that is fixed, I assume that "-t auto" could also be faked by replacing auto with a long list of fs types (or running "fstype" in the
2008 Aug 22
1
syslinux-3.71-21-gbd09a6d - build breakage
Got the following trying to build git master: gcc -std=gnu99 -m32 -fno-stack-protector -mregparm=3 -DREGPARM=3 -march=i386 -Os -W -Wall -march=i386 -fomit-frame-pointer -D__COM32__ -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -I../../com32/libutil/include -I../../com32/include -c -o chain.o chain.c ld -m elf_i386 -T ../../com32/lib/com32.ld -o chain.elf chain.o ../../com32/libutil/libutil_com.a
2002 Nov 28
2
[LLVMdev] Breakage in CVS?
The following function produces a segv when the begin() is taken from vmap, the ScalarMap... bool StaticMemAnalysis::isSingleMalloc(DSGraph* theGraph,DSNode* theNode) { int count = 0; std::map<Value*, DSNodeHandle>& vmap = theGraph->getScalarMap(); for (std::map<Value*, DSNodeHandle>::iterator i = vmap.begin(); i != vmap.end(); ++i) { if(i->second.getNode() ==
2002 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] Breakage in CVS?
> The following function produces a segv when the begin() is taken from > vmap, the ScalarMap... > int count = 0; > std::map<Value*, DSNodeHandle>& vmap = theGraph->getScalarMap(); Are you sure "theGraph" is not null at this point? -Chris > for (std::map<Value*, DSNodeHandle>::iterator i = vmap.begin(); i > != vmap.end(); ++i) { >
2002 Nov 28
2
[LLVMdev] Breakage in CVS?
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > The following function produces a segv when the begin() is taken from > > vmap, the ScalarMap... > > int count = 0; > > std::map<Value*, DSNodeHandle>& vmap = theGraph->getScalarMap(); > > Are you sure "theGraph" is not null at this point? yes... that call returns sucessfully. the segfault
2002 Nov 28
0
[LLVMdev] Breakage in CVS?
> > > The following function produces a segv when the begin() is taken from > > > vmap, the ScalarMap... > > > int count = 0; > > > std::map<Value*, DSNodeHandle>& vmap = theGraph->getScalarMap(); > > > > Are you sure "theGraph" is not null at this point? > yes... that call returns sucessfully. the segfault occurs after...
2008 Mar 24
0
[LLVMdev] Potential breakage in llvm-gcc's ./configure
> This is close to a showstopper for integrating an llvm-gcc bootstrap > into the nightly tester. The llvm-gcc ./configure needs to be called > very differently from the llvm ./configure, and keeping two sets of > options is Not Worth The Trouble, at least IMHO. So you didn't like the suggestion of having the configure for llvm-gcc set via an environment variable? That avoids
2008 Mar 24
0
[LLVMdev] Potential breakage in llvm-gcc's ./configure
Hello, Joachim > Hm. For some reason, ld kept searching the wrong (64-bit) library paths > when trying to link the 32-bit results. Hrm. This looks like to be old story about 'lib vs lib32 vs lib64' directories in different distributions. Almost every of them patch gcc inside their packages to provide valid library paths. Look for example, here:
2008 May 22
1
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] fix for FreeBSD/powerpc build breakage
All, The following patch fixes the build breakage on FreeBSD/powerpc: Index: lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCJITInfo.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCJITInfo.cpp (revision 51432) +++ lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCJITInfo.cpp (working copy) @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ extern "C" void PPC64CompilationCallback(); #if (defined(__POWERPC__) ||
2008 Aug 12
0
[LLVMdev] More llvm-gcc build breakage
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 03:06:54PM -0700, Julien Lerouge wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:32:18AM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote: > > On Jul 30, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Julien Lerouge wrote: > >> ../../../llvm-gcc4.2-src/gcc/libgcc2.c:2095: error: conflicting types > >> for 'VirtualProtect' > >> > >>
2008 Aug 12
0
[LLVMdev] More llvm-gcc build breakage
> Rev 54193 seems to cause that failure doing a non bootstrap build on > MingW. > +#ifdef __i386__ > +extern int VirtualProtect (char *, int, int, int *) __attribute__((stdcall)); > +#endif Do we need this stuff at all? afair, I deleted the whole lines in r47684 to sync libgcc2.c with mainline gcc. -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov