Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4878] New: segfault when i386 client touches x86_64 server (no rsh/ssh) both cvs 3.0.0 today 20070813"
2008 Feb 21
5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5275] New: user id mapping stopped working with 3.0.0pre10
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5275
Summary: user id mapping stopped working with 3.0.0pre10
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: brian@aljex.com
2003 Jun 16
3
crash on 2 gig file
Hi, I'm still waiting for my list subscription but if I don't send in this
bug report now I won't for who-knows-how-long and I want to get it in....
I'm using 2.5.6 compiled from
cvs on SCO Open Server 5.0.6
bothe machines are the same version of OS and the same copy of rsync.
on my live machine one of the database files eventually got to be 2 gigs
the file has since then been
2017 Mar 14
4
Rsyncing without RSH or SSH ?
People,
This doesn't seem possible - would it be possible to hack a version of
rsync to do it?
As an exercise, I want to create a VM image (or at least backup of all
the files with rsync) from a SCSI drive in an old Red Hat (NOT
Enterprise) v5.2 Linux 486 machine (circa 1999 that does have rsync on
it but it has protocol problems talking my server). The 486 has:
- an ISA Adaptec 1542
2009 May 19
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6378] New: "rsync -v -rsync -v --inplace --progress --rsh=ssh -a" reports erroneous and completely unrealistic transferred size
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6378
Summary: "rsync -v -rsync -v --inplace --progress --rsh=ssh -a"
reports erroneous and completely unrealistic transferred
size
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.6
Platform: x86
URL: http://www.shlomifish.org/Files/files/code/rsync/jing-
2010 May 26
4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7456] New: exclude directory based on presence of a file
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7456
Summary: exclude directory based on presence of a file
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.7
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: IT at mcgeecorp.com
2010 Nov 20
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7807] New: Error when using rsync: as protocol prefix and :: as module separator
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7807
Summary: Error when using rsync: as protocol prefix and :: as
module separator
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.7
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
2010 Apr 03
2
Using ifelse and grep
Good Morning,
I am trying to create a new column of character strings based on the first
two letters in a string in another column. I believe that I need to use some
combination of ifelse and grep but I am not totally sure how to combine
them. I am not totally sure why the command below isn't working. Obviously
it isn't finding anything that matches my criteria but I am not sure why.
Any
2003 Oct 17
2
compression, built-in or ssh ?
What is the general recommendation for compression when using ssh?
Is it a wasteful performance hit to have both ssh and rsync do compression
(when using rsync over ssh)?
If so, is there a clear prefference which is more efficient, rsync or ssh?
Brian K. White -- brian@aljex.com -- http://www.aljex.com/bkw/
2017 Jun 05
10
[Bug 12819] New: [PATCH] sync() on receiving side for data consistency
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12819
Bug ID: 12819
Summary: [PATCH] sync() on receiving side for data consistency
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
2012 Feb 02
2
[Bug 8740] New: compress ("-z") should be ignored if both src and dst are local
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8740
Summary: compress ("-z") should be ignored if both src and dst
are local
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at
2007 Mar 10
2
rsh with passwords
I am doing rsync over a private network. Encryption is not required.
Currently rsync over ssh works, but requires too many CPU cycles
(especially when doing a lot of transfers) on a CPU-bound system. I need
to use rsh instead.
The problem is, I can either set rsh to allow transfers without a
password, or it won't let me transfer files at all.
I need rsh to ask for a password. The network
2004 Jun 03
2
rsync 2.6.2 doesn't work with GNU inetutils rsh
Hi,
Not sure when this stopped working, because I'm sure it used to.
This is the cygwin build of rsync, with the standard cygwin
rsh (which is a fairly old GNU inetutils 1.3.2).
~=> rsync --rsh=rsh -vv bibble:
opening connection using rsh bibble rsync --server --sender -vvr .
rsh: unknown option -- server
Try `rsh --help' for more information.
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed
2006 Feb 02
2
rsh/rlogin on CentOS4.2
Hello all,
I'm not quite sure what has changed in the recent rsh commands, but I
can't seem to get around the password promting. I need a clnk rsh between
two machines in order to run my backup script.
I added all the usual .rhosts with the proper permissions et al added the
xinetd.d confilg files, opened ports 543 and 544 in my firewall, yet when
I use the rsh commands, I get either a
2006 May 12
2
Usage of a telnet client instead of ssh or rsh
Hi all,
i am building an authentification system based upon MIT kerberos.
I set up a realm in which I can use the ftp and telnet server/clients
infrastructure for the purpose of authentification. To backup my server
i would like to use rsync, but instead of a ssh/rsh/stunnel with an
encrypted kerberized telnet.
My problem is, that i could connect manually via telnet.krb5, but if
like to use it
2004 Oct 13
3
[Bug 1924] unable to rsync between a PC with cygwin and a unix machine using rsh
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1924
wayned@samba.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2004-10-13 09:09
2012 Jun 03
1
[Bug 8973] New: --delete or similar (--delete-after / --delete-before) does not work if used after --rsh
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8973
Summary: --delete or similar (--delete-after / --delete-before)
does not work if used after --rsh
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo:
2001 Feb 26
0
RPM .spec files: rsh requirement removed
Hello all,
I think it's time to remove /usr/bin/rsh as a build requirement from
contrib/*/*.spec files. I really want to start getting rid of r* tools
already.. :-)
This has been there from OpenSSH 2.1.1p4 era or so because back then, if
configure couldn't find /usr/bin/rsh, it wouldn't be defined at all (see
below).
Also, FallBackToRsh isn't enabled by default so this
2002 Feb 07
0
rsh syntax - Help
rsync -a /opt/config/. DevlServ:/opt/config
(see rsync.1)
Tim Conway
tim.conway@philips.com
303.682.4917
Philips Semiconductor - Longmont TC
1880 Industrial Circle, Suite D
Longmont, CO 80501
Available via SameTime Connect within Philips, n9hmg on AIM
perl -e 'print pack(nnnnnnnnnnnn,
19061,29556,8289,28271,29800,25970,8304,25970,27680,26721,25451,25970),
".\n" '
"There
2002 Nov 18
3
[Bug 438] SFTP does not work for users with RSH shells
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438
------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org 2002-11-19 05:46 -------
if the user logs in and types /path/to/sftp-server does he/she get an error?
If rsh is impeeding running the command then it is a rsh issue and not a sftp
issue.
- Ben
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or
2006 Apr 01
0
CESA-2005:074 CentOS Low 3 x86_64 rsh - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2005:074
rsh security update for CentOS 3 x86_64:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-074.html
The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to
the mirrors:
x86_64:
updates/x86_64/RPMS/rsh-0.17-17.6.x86_64.rpm
updates/x86_64/RPMS/rsh-server-0.17-17.6.x86_64.rpm
source:
updates/SRPMS/rsh-0.17-17.6.src.rpm
You may update your