Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "[Re: problems with rsync version CVS]"
2007 Aug 04
1
problems with rsync version CVS
i'm trying to use latest CVS rsync, but i'm getting these errors:
*** glibc detected *** rsync: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer:
0x0d757d58 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(cfree+0x1bb)[0xb7eeffeb]
rsync[0x807f2f0]
rsync[0x804bc22]
rsync[0x8056a5d]
rsync[0x8056e83]
rsync[0x806101a]
rsync[0x8061869]
rsync[0x8062bf8]
rsync[0x8077fef]
rsync[0x80623a6]
2008 Sep 15
5
fixing user, group, and mtime with rsync?
Hi all.
I prepared a mirror (that is intended to be updated by rsync)
by doing the initial copy using cpio (for efficiency on 15 million files).
Unfortunately, user, group, and mtime of some directories and files
was copied incorrectly.
Can I use rsync (GIT) to fix this?
Greetings
Sven
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type:
2007 Aug 02
4
Which rsync version?
Hi all.
I once tried to rsync around 100 GB (10 million files), but version
2.6.6 needed too much RAM and was too slow.
Is one of the snapshots stable enough to try this again?
Greetings
Sven
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
2007 Sep 03
2
Recommended way for initial backup before rsync calls
Hi rsync'ers.
What can you recommend to create the initial backup of a
partition before calling rsync
(under Linux, 100 GB, 10M files, only normal files and
some soft links)?
(Using rsync takes too long for this initial copy.)
Here are some candidates:
1. star -copy -no-fsync -p -xdot -C $1 . $2
2. tar -C $1 -cf - . | tar -C $2 -xf -
3. cp -a $1 $2
4. cpio ...
...
Any experiences?
2008 Nov 18
2
Rsync, what are the max transfer limitations ?
What is the maximum transfer rate allowed for rsync? I mean the limitations?
I can't get more than 50Mbit speed in my gigabit lan, with rsync
server or with ssh. ftp transfers reach >400Mbit , so it is not a lan
or nic problem.
Maybe it has something to do with my cpu limitations? or the
limitations for rsync is the 50Mb/s?
Here is my rsyncd.conf if it helps
> # by gourgi
> max
2008 Apr 27
1
initialization issues
I guess I'm missing something since the following minimized test case is failing:
>>>
#include "ogg/ogg.h"
main() {
ogg_sync_state the_ogg_sync_state;
ogg_sync_init(&the_ogg_sync_state);
ogg_sync_destroy( &the_ogg_sync_state );
}
>>>
$ gcc -g -logg test.c
$ ./a.out
*** glibc detected *** ./a.out: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer:
2011 Feb 20
3
[LLVMdev] Build problems with llvm-gcc
Hi there
I'm new to LLVM & am trying to build llvm-gcc.
I'm using Ubuntu 10.0.4. on an AMD64 processor.
I've had no problems with building the LLVM suite itself, but during
llvm-gcc compilation I am presented with the following error message - does
anybody happen to know if there is any remedy?
/root/llvm_gcc_source/llvm-gcc-objects/./gcc/xgcc
2007 Aug 28
2
moderation?
Hi.
I get the feeling it's time to turn this list into a moderated one ...
Greetings
Sven
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/attachments/20070828/aa56db7a/attachment.bin
2006 Nov 07
1
[resolved] asterisk 1,4 and google talk
hi,
it turns out that the iksemel library (which i installed using an rpm) was
returning 0 when the function iks_has_tls() was called. it should return 1
otherwise res_jabber.o thinks gnuTLS is not installed. i confirmed this by
running a test program i wrote, that calls iks_has_tls . it returned 0.
i downloaded iksemel source, compiled it and now the test program returned
1.
now,
2016 Mar 24
0
nut-ipmipsu 2.7.3-2.7.4 crash on ipmi_sdr_ctx_destroy in libfreeipmi_cleanup
ipmi_sdr_ctx_destroy is already called in libfreeipmi_get_sensors_info
but sdr_ctx isn't nulled so libfreeipmi_cleanup is trying to destroy it
second time.
*** Error in `nut-ipmipsu': munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer:
0x000055de01edee50 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x77a8d)[0x7fec04122a8d]
/lib64/libc.so.6(cfree+0x79d)[0x7fec0412eefd]
2010 Jul 27
1
sieve error
Hi,
dovecot-2.0-rc3
dovecot-2-0-pigeonhole-4cb55beaca07
when I run 'doveadm config', it prints such error, any help? thanks :)
*** glibc detected *** /home/mail/bin/doveconf: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x001115fc ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/i686/nosegneg/libc.so.6(cfree+0x188)[0x36e758]
/home/mail/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0[0x7db41a]
2009 Mar 30
1
Crash in 1.1.18-6.1
Wine 1.1.18-6.1 is crashing under Arch Linux x86_64. An example of the crash happens when I run winecfg :
Code:
*** glibc detected *** winecfg.exe: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0xf7f96018 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/opt/lib32/lib/libc.so.6[0xf7d67ee4]
2004 May 26
1
bwlimit=
Wayne replied to my original note which said that in a special situation that I was using to probe rsync to build a behavioral model that bwlimit= resulted in bimodal behavior around a 4000 kbyte/sec value.
He responded with a patch that I have tested in a limited way. I have a push scenario from a local site to a remote site. I use a file that is 6.3 Megabyte in size whose checksums (when
2011 Oct 03
4
[LLVMdev] ld crashes with invalid pointer on Ubuntu 11.04 x86 when linking libgcc_s.so
This shouldn't be considered our bug (should it?). I'm going to
report it to Ubuntu.
I will restart my build, but does anyone else see this on Ubuntu
11.04? Note that I have a 32-bit machine with 2 GB of RAM and no
swap.
$ ld --version
GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu) 2.21.0.20110327
Copyright 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
$ uname -a
Linux frylock 2.6.38-11-generic #50-Ubuntu
2001 Aug 06
3
rsync 2.4.7pre1 release
Well, here's rsync 2.4.7 preview 1:
rsync://va.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.4.7pre1.tar.bz2
http://va.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.4.7pre1.tar.bz2
You need bunzip2 to decompress these files:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/bzip2
The change list is below.
Please, do try this out and let us know either if it works for you or
if it does not. We need both kinds of
2006 Jun 10
4
Question setting up a "bat phone" extension.
Basically, I am looking to set up an extension which will be used as a "help-line".
I want it to function kind of like the bat phone from the old Batman series,
where Commissioner Gordon would pick up the extension in his office and it
would ring the phone back at Wayne's mansion. Is there a way to duplicate
this functionality with Asterisk?
I just need asterisk to auto-dial an
2016 May 04
1
R process killed when allocating too large matrix (Mac OS X)
> Can you elaborate on "leads to R being killed"? You should tell to the killer not to do it again :).
Hi Simon!
Sure, but who do you tell it if you don't know the killer?
This is all the killer left me with, the 'crime scene' if you like :-)
> m <- matrix(0, 90000, 100000)
Killed: 9
My colleague Wayne Oldford also tried it on his Mac machine and
apparently the
2020 Jun 12
3
tcltk image reading problem (on a mac?): [tcl] encountered an unsupported criticial chunk type "eXIf"
Dear Simon,
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 9:00 PM, Simon Urbanek <simon.urbanek at r-project.org> wrote:
>
> Wayne,
>
> that one is unrelated, but interesting - you can fix it with
>
> sudo install_name_tool -change \
> /usr/local/lib:/opt/X11/lib/libtk8.6.dylib \
> /usr/local/lib/libtk8.6.dylib \
> /usr/local/bin/wish8.6
>
> There is a bug in tcltk with
2016 May 05
4
R process killed when allocating too large matrix (Mac OS X)
Hi Simon,
thanks for your quick reply.
1) ... so you can reproduce this?
2) Do you know a way how this can be 'foreseen'? We allocate larger
matrices in the copula package depending on the user's input
dimension. It would be good to tell her/him "Your dimension is quite
large. Be aware of killers in your neighborhood"... before the killer
attacks.
Thanks & cheers,
2011 Aug 06
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc near tip causing crash in /usr/bin/ld due to memory corruption on linux x86_64
Hi everyone,
-r136747 of llvm-gcc (and possibly others) is apparently tickling a binutils
issue on linux x86-64
Has anyone seen anything like this?
Thanks
-jason
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110806/e7e717ef/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------