similar to: does the incremental rsync algorithm save on storage?

I'm trying to use the rsync algorithm for incremental backups. After a quick look at rsync I saw the batch mode operations, and I thought that maybe I can modify them for incremental backups. What is needed is to add an option to save the checksums of all the files of the level 0 backup and a second option to use the level n checksum to calculate the delta batch files for the level n+1

Hi, Dovecot 1.1.3 is running on Mac OS X 10.5 latest version, with Maildir (LAYOUT=fs). I have following issues when Entourage 2008 connects it, over imap/imaps. Entourage does not cache the mails. After every restart the folder contents are fetched fresh. I have enabled the Entourage option to get entire messages. Entourage caches the gmail IMAP folders fine. Also Outlook 2007 does not

I have a user who has Mac OS 10.4.8 with Entourage X. The email server is sendmail 8.13.8 and is setup to use STARTTLS on a CentOS 4.4 system. It appears from everything I have googled that only Entourage 2004 will properly function with STARTTLS. Has anybody any experience with Entourage X ... specifically is there something I am missing regarding the CentOS server setup or are all Entourage

Background: I'm running a RH9 box with Dovecot 0.99.11. Dovecot was installed using yum and the rpm found on http://dag.wieers.com/packages/dovecot/. With two exceptions I've been enormously happy with Dovecot. I'm even happier having recently successfully installed pop-before-smtp sop one exception down. However the other problem I've experienced is becoming critical. I've

I'm beginning to migrate my years of mail stuck in Entourage 2004 (MacOSX) to dovecot imap on Fedora FC4. No matter how I have tried I cannot get the status flags to migrate. Eg: all the mail, once transfered from the pop archive to the imap server looses all Status: and X-Status: flags and ends up being marked "new" on the imap side. After lots of testing it appears that,

Hello, I've been trying to figure out how to control the space required for backups using rsync, large files, and an incremental backup scheme. In particular, I've got two customers in which I'm creating Exchange backups using the built-in MS backup, then rsyncing an exchange.bks file nightly. One customer has a 4.3GB exchanges.bks file, and although rsync works wonderfully by only

Tere. Recently just migrated from Sendmail 8.14.3 to Postfix 2.5.6 and switched from Cyrus-sasl 2.1.22 to Dovecot 1.1.13 sasl, all are compiled from source and I have used Dovecot for a long time, since alpha versions. Everything worked well for Outlook Express, Outlook and Thunderbird clients, but Microsoft Entourage 2004 or 2008 clients smtps fails - "Authentication failed because

I'm still pretty new to running a mail server, but one thing I've come to appreciate over the years is a good backup strategy. Since I have always run my own servers for practice and for personal use I don't have access to Enterprise backup solutions. Because of that I usually just fall back to scripts and tarballs and offload the content on a regular basis. Right now I'm

Hi folks, Is there a good tool for repairing/working with mbox files? I'm trying to get a user moved off of Entourage (Outlook for Mac). Entourage actually exports the mail (was pop, will be imap) as mbox files, however, I can't just drop them in place even after fixing the line-endings. many of the messages with attachments come up with the correct header info but no message body

Hi Guys, I recently configured an mail server running postfix + dovecot + mysql + postfixadmin, everything is running ok except for Mac Entourage clients which is a PITA IMO, I always get a authentication not supported error while thunderbird and outlook on windows don't. Any ideas or workaround? my dovecot version is dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5. here's the output of dovecot.conf and

I have dovecot set up to run IMAP services without SSL (I have tested many other configurations as well, but this reproduces the problem the simplest). When attempting to connect to the imap server using Entourage for OS X on a mac, I receive the following error: Mail could not be received at this time. The server returned the following error . Dovecot reports a successful login and nothing

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:59:37AM -0700, The Doctor wrote: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:38:42AM -0500, Tom Talpey wrote: > > On 11/8/2016 2:24 AM, A.L.E.C wrote: > > > On 08.11.2016 08:04, The Doctor wrote: > > > > > >> In another account, I see lots of white items in RoundCude as if these items are > > >> hidden from Thunderbird hance blocking

Hi, after some searching i didn't came up with an answer so please excuse if this is a total newbie question. My problem: I have server A which has a big (>500G) database like file. On server B i want to have a copy of this file which i don't want to copy each time but sync the deltas so that only the deltas are written once a day. Bandwidth between A and B isn't the problem.

I am seeing issues with Thunderbird IMAP and POP3 and Entourage issues of non-deleting / repeating e-mail. Any one else gettting that? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism Merry Christmas 2016

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 03:16:35PM -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2016-12-12 15:08, The Doctor wrote: > > I am seeing issues with > > Thunderbird > > > > IMAP and POP3 > > > > and > > > > Entourage issues > > > > of non-deleting / repeating e-mail. > > > > Any one else gettting that? > Not I. Which Dovecot

I've looking into the possibility of using rsync for mirroring where we are currently using iOra. It looks like iOra has two main advantages over rsync: 1) can calculate deltas across multiple files (i.e., blocks common to two files will only appear once in the delta) 2) can de-couple delta calculation and application (creates deltas offline) I'm pretty sure I can emulate (1) by

Hi There, I've been toying around with the code of rsync on and off for a while, and I had a thought that I would like some comments on. Its to do with very large files and disk space. One of the common uses of rsync is to use it as a backup program. A client connects to the rsync server, and sends over any changed files. If the client has very large files that have changed marginally,

Hi All, I am posting this querry second time. What i need is-- {Is there any command by which I can get only the updation of file ie only the incremental?. Suppose I have a text file say ss.txt of 3KB in size and I have taken the backup of this file. Now I am making the changes in to this file(ss.txt) by adding 1KB of data. Now I want this 1KB data (in to a new file) when I take the

I'm interested in these very questions (librsync-rsync relationship, remaining limitations of rsync, active prospects for ground-up rewrites), Google searches for rsync info have proved a little too vague due to the programs ubiquity. Much has certainly changed since this was written, could some people with knowledge in these areas could update martin's response for the state of rsync,

Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> writes: > On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote: > | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I > | didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One > | consequence is (at least on Mac OS X 10.11 but probably in more > | generality) that R_BATCH_OPTIONS are