similar to: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4793] New: link-dest hardlink does not always work well with -o -g -p

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4793] New: link-dest hardlink does not always work well with -o -g -p"

2013 Dec 19
5
[Bug 10334] New: rsync doesn't log hardlink-copies using --link-dest
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10334 Summary: rsync doesn't log hardlink-copies using --link-dest Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: Kontakt at
2012 Apr 15
0
Bug#666024: rsync --link-dest can incorrectly hardlink together destination files
[please Cc: 666024-forwarded at bugs.debian.org on any replies, thanks] Please see the attached Debian bug report, which includes a helpful bug-reproducing shell script; I've confirmed this still happens with 3.0.9. Paul Slootman On Tue 27 Mar 2012, Ian Jackson wrote: > Package: rsync > Version: 3.0.7-2 > > With rsync --link-dest, if two different source files (not hardlinked
2008 Jun 20
1
problem with rdiff
Hi all. (I am sending this querry here because it is somehow relating to rsync. If i am wrong please pardon me.) I am doing following on these windowsXP and Vista. I am trying to get only incremental backup using "rdiff-backup" (that also uses rsync). I have installed gcc compiler and by following the steps given in http://katastrophos.net/andre/blog/2005/11/02/rdiff-backup-on-windows/
2004 Dec 01
1
rsync transfers whole content when a new hardlink is created
Hi, I detected a silly behaviour of rsync when new hardlinks of already synced files are created: Scenario: There are a local directory and a equal remote directory created by former run of rsync. Create a hardlink from a already existing file (both inside the local directory). If this hardlink has a filename with comes before the original filename when both are sorted in alphabetic order,
2020 Jul 17
0
[OT] What is the max hardlink number for a single file on XFS
Hi list, I have a little script that uses rysnc and hardlink to perform backups. Some days ago a friend told me that rsync could crash if the hardlink limit is reached. I know (and tested) that for ext4 the max number of hardlink for a single file is 65000 but I can't get a limit on XFS. Due to the fact that I can't get good resources from google search, I tried to reach its limit
2007 Apr 26
1
rsync mirroring and hardlink issues
I'm running a mirror of several repositories that are fetched using separate rsync runs. Since some of those repositories are hosting related files, I'm using the hardlink utility[1] in order to save disk space. However, I've noticed an issue that may lead to potential file metadata inconsistencies when using hardlink. Consider the following scenario: - two repositories (rep_a and
2007 Nov 18
2
post transfer script for forcing perms
I'm looking to see of it is practical to have an rsync server run a script after a transfer finishes. I am moving files (python source) from windows (common point of development) to a few linux machines. big problem being owner/group/perms are always wrong and python's module install process is fragile with respect to OGP. Therefore, I want to run a script after transferring a set
2009 Sep 20
1
Hardlink patches for sftp
Dear all, I am looking for the status on the hardlink patches that were published on this list last february by Miklos Szeredi? I'd really like to have hardlink support in sftp. This would in turn enable hardlinks in sshfs and make incremental rsync backups to remote filesystems possible. can someone tell me if these patches will be incorporated in openssh? The patches can be found under
2013 Dec 30
1
[Bug 10352] New: link-by-hash hardlink-collection maintenance mode
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10352 Summary: link-by-hash hardlink-collection maintenance mode Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: jimklimov at
2012 Nov 08
1
Hardlink with Maildir a brief help
Hi to all, my question is: Is possible implementing SIS (with hardlink) with maildir instead of *dbox format? If yes in dovecot.conf it's only necessary the below parameters or what else? mail_attachment_dir = /var/qmail/attachments I have also acting the zlib plugin it is not a problem isn't it? Thanks in advance for any response -- */Davide Marchi /Teorema Ferrara Srl /(Tel:
2015 May 07
5
Backup PC or other solution
Il 07/05/2015 11:24, Marcin Trendota ha scritto: > W dniu 06.05.2015 o 21:21, Alessandro Baggi pisze: > >> What do you mean about Backup PC? >> Any experiences? >> What solution do you use? > > BackupPC is good, howewer it's a pity you can't search for a file in > GUI. But it works well, i'm backing up 32 hosts (servers, desktops). > > Can
2009 May 27
1
How to emulate rdiff behaviour
Hi, i am new to rsync and i want to use rsync to emulate rdiff behaviour (because i can't install rdiff on the system). What i would like rsync to do is to generate a diff file (like with rsync --write-batch) but WITHOUT changing the destination file. This would allow me to store daily differential updates on the target (i think hardlinking would not help me much as the file is changing every
2007 Jan 14
4
feature request, hardlink progress......
I'm copying a partition that has a bunch of hardlink based snapshots (-aPH). I think there's about 250,000 files in each backup and between 100 and 200 snapshots. Earlier today, I saw the files had completed and it was making all the hardlinks. I thought it would be "not long" but it's been making hardlinks for 12 hours (at least). There's only 36Gb in snapshot, the
2014 Jun 30
6
Mailboxes are in Maildir format. Any good backup tips? Had success with version control?
I'm still pretty new to running a mail server, but one thing I've come to appreciate over the years is a good backup strategy. Since I have always run my own servers for practice and for personal use I don't have access to Enterprise backup solutions. Because of that I usually just fall back to scripts and tarballs and offload the content on a regular basis. Right now I'm
2009 Sep 20
12
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6746] New: file from link-dest-source is copies and not linked for identical files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6746 Summary: file from link-dest-source is copies and not linked for identical files Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at
2006 Apr 17
6
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3692] New: regression: symlinks are created as hardlinks with --link-dest
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3692 Summary: regression: symlinks are created as hardlinks with -- link-dest Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 URL: http://rsync.samba.org OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core
2009 Sep 04
8
Remote backup of server
Hello, I want mount directory of one server to another over internet. I was looking to NFS4, but there are no security mechanisms. I need encrypted connection using private key (something like SFTP). Or - if there is in CentOS repo (or EPEL) package, that can mount directory over internet using private key and make differential backup (like rdiff-backup). Thank you very much for links or other
2018 Jul 18
2
link-dest and batch-file
Hello. I need that during today's backup, the metadata about the files is saved in a file, so that tomorrow when creating a backup with the option "link-dest" instead of this option I would specify a file with metadata, then rsync will not scan the folder specified in "link-dest", but simply reads information about this folder from a file with
2015 May 07
2
Backup PC or other solution
On May 7, 2015 6:05 AM, "Jussi Hirvi" <greenspot at greenspot.fi> wrote: > > I wonder why nobody has yet mentioned rdiff-backup. It combines browsable directories with multiple versions - the version data is stored in a separate rdiff-backup-data subdirectory (one per backup task). > > One downside is that rdiff-backup causes a lot of network traffic. For that reason I
2015 Nov 27
2
[g.danti@assyoma.it: Re: Questions about hardlinks, alternate storage and compression]
> centos 7.x is latest, so if you need help upgrade make a bug report to > centos, not waste your time here since you choiced a precompiled > problem, reporting here 7s helpfull if you use dovecot compiled with > the latest version here, this migth be a unknown bug you then have > found, but not if you use precompiled problems, then report to the > maintainers of such software