similar to: Might hanging bugs remain in rsync 3.0.0?

What's the status of acl support for OS X? What needs to be done? The xattr support works nicely; you can try it out by moving a few "text clippings" back and forth from HFS+ to ext3 (say) with and without the -X switch set. Or move them locally that way, for that matter. (Text clippings are _all_ resource fork). -- W. Oates

Version 3.0.0cvs protocol version 30.PR4 Capabilities: 64-bit files, 32-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints, socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace, append, no ACLs, xattrs, iconv The exclude test fails on OS X Darwin Kernel Version 8.10.1 RELEASE_I386. It just hangs there until CTL-C. The same test passes on the G4 PPC Darwin 8.10.0, and on i686 Xeon

I compiled 3.0.6pre1, including the crtimes and fileflags patches for use on Intel OS X 10.5.6, as described by Mr. Bombich (thanks!) here: <http://www.bombich.com/mactips/rsync.html> I want to use 3.0.6 because it seems that this bug: <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5365> has been resolved (yay!). ----- [~]$ rsync --version rsync version 3.0.6pre1 protocol version 30

Hi, On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:45:20 +0100 Daniel Maher wrote: >> I am experiencing a (consistent, reproducible) condition whereby rsync >> is hanging indefinitely at the following stage : >> generate_files phase=1 > Eschewing the 2.6.9 that ships by default on Cygwin, I compiled Matt's > patched rsync 3.0.0 by hand and moved forward with that binary. After > trying

Dear R-Community! The example "oats" in MASS (2nd edition, 10.3, p.309) is calculated for aov and lme without interaction term and the results are the same. But I have problems to reproduce the example aov with interaction in MASS (10.2, p.301) with lme. Here the script: library(MASS) library(nlme) options(contrasts = c("contr.treatment", "contr.poly")) # aov: Y ~

Dear List, I have been using R to create an xyplot using the panel function within lattice libraries. This plot is based on the data supplied in R named 'Oats'. The graph represents oat yield by nitro level with an overlay of each variety of oats for each nitro level. I have three questions regarding this graph: 1) I cannot seem to specify the type of symbol used by the plot, even though

Dear R users, this is a follow up of this message http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e6/help/09/05/13897.html I'm reproducing the core of it for convenience. > // > / data(Oats, package = "MEMSS") / > / tp1.oats <- xyplot(yield ~ nitro | Variety + Block, / > / data = Oats, / > / panel = function(x, y, subscripts, ...) { /

Full_Name: Kevin Wright Version: 1.8.0 OS: Windows 95 Submission from: (NULL) (170.54.59.160) This bug also happens to me using R 1.9.0 on Windows 2000. Took me a long time to create a reproducible bug, but I think I have succeeded. I suspect my test function has a bug, but I don't see anything wrong. Plus, the bug only shows up when selecting certain filenames. Nearest I can speculate,

The following code produces a legend ("key") that mentions the unused levels of Block. library(MEMSS) xyplot(yield~nitro, subset=(Block=="I" | Block=="II"), data=Oats, group=Block, auto.key=T) and adding "drop.unused.levels=T" does not fix it. And in fact even the following does not solve the problem: xyplot(yield~nitro,

Hello all, I am experiencing a (consistent, reproducible) condition whereby rsync is hanging indefinitely at the following stage : generate_files phase=1 The condition does not occur if --dry-run is specified - only when the run is "for real". Finally, i can scp the files without problems, so it is not a general connection issue, nor is it a problem with permissions (everything is

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 7:21 AM, Steven Tardy <sjt5atra at gmail.com> wrote: > >> A STATEFUL firewall with ?ip any any? can and will still block asymmetric >> communications due to the firewall keeping track of state (hence tha name >> stateful firewall). >> >>

Yes, it's finally that time -- rsync 3.0.0 has been released. This is a feature release that also includes quite a few bug fixes. I'd like thank everyone who participated in the development and testing of rsync. I hope that you enjoy this latest version! The 3.0.0 version number is such a large bump up from 2.6.9 due to the addition of an incremental recursion scan (which helps a lot

Yes, it's finally that time -- rsync 3.0.0 has been released. This is a feature release that also includes quite a few bug fixes. I'd like thank everyone who participated in the development and testing of rsync. I hope that you enjoy this latest version! The 3.0.0 version number is such a large bump up from 2.6.9 due to the addition of an incremental recursion scan (which helps a lot

I am trying to do Tukey HSD comparisons on a repeated measures expt. I found the following example on r-help and quoted approvingly elsewhere. It is broken. Can anyone please tell me how to get it to work? I am using R 2.4.1. > require(MASS) ## for oats data set > require(nlme) ## for lme() > require(multcomp) ## for multiple comparison stuff > Aov.mod <- aov(Y ~ N + V +

Dear all, Consider a completely randomized block design (let's use data(Oats) irrespoctive of the split-plot design it was arranged in). Look: library(nlme) fit <- lme(yield ~ nitro, Oats, random = ~1|Block, method="ML") fit2 <- lm(yield ~ nitro + Block, Oats) anova(fit, fit2) gives this: Model df AIC BIC logLik Test L.Ratio p-value fit 1 4 624.3245

When we call a lattice function such as xyplot, to what extent does the "data" designation cause the function to look inside the "data" for variables? In the examples below, the "subset" argument understands that "Variety" is a variable in the data. But the "scales" argument does not understand that "nitro" is a variable in the data.

Looking for more efficient replication or synchronization solution than rsync, take a look at syncdat by www.dataexpedition.com Mike -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

Hi, I tried using rsyncX which is a GUI front end for rsync and as it turns out, the installer downgraded the current version from version 2.6.3 protocol version 28 to version 2.6.6 protocol version 27. I would like to learn more about how to get a newer version of rsync installed. Where would be a good place for a beginner to start? Thanks Much, Scott G.

I too have the same issue (reported by Warren) - in that 3.06 backups appear valid, but the terminal shows the following errors: rsync(18819) malloc: *** error for object 0xf305c: Non-aligned pointer being freed *** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug I'm looking for confirmation that these are simply anomalies, and indeed are not cause for concern. Thanks.

Dear all, I am looking for a good reference on "Survival analysis". I am looking for a booking containing both applications and Maths. Explaining different methods in survival analysis .... Many thanks Bernard --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]