similar to: range get reqests in rsync, please?

After yum upgrade, the new CentOS5 kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-92.1.1.el5.i686 ] crashes each time early in boot process on Compaq ProLiant 3000 with dual Pentium3 CPU (600 MHz, CPU0: Intel Pentium III (Katmai) stepping 03, CPU1 the same). I get kernel panic at powernowk8_init+0x05e/0x1c3. The previous kernel [ kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.i686 ] seems to work fine. I am wondering if anyone has met

Below the trojaned and clean md5s are given. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 13:39:22 +0200 From: Magnus Bodin <magnus at bodin.org> To: Wojtek Pilorz <wpilorz at bdk.pl> Cc: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org Subject: Re: openssh-3.4p1.tar.gz on ftp.openbsd.org changing rather than frozen On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 09:20:29AM +0200, Wojtek Pilorz wrote:

I am enclosing scripts and config files to generate exact copy of CentOS 5.0 i386 installation DVD image, that is CentOS-5.0-i386-bin-DVD.iso if you have CD images for i386. If there is interest I can post the same for x86_64. Please follow README files for instructions. All the scripts are GPL. SHA1 for attached files: 439f7b0bd50722388a2836eedafeb1c227f97385 *00_README.txt

I have seen that file ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/OpenSSH/portable/openssh-3.4p1.tar.gz is continuosly changing. This seems strange to me as I expected it should be a 'frozen' file; The signature and diff file are still dated Jun 26. I am wondering whether this is intentional. Best regards, Wojtek

Dear All, Let me quote a few lines from TODO file (SNAP-20010109): - Linux hangs for 20 seconds when you do "sleep 20&exit". All current solutions break scp or leaves processes hanging around after the ssh connection has ended. It seems to be linked to two things. One select() under Linux is not as nice as others, and two the children of the shell are not killed on

i'm running on vmware system and HP proliant DL360 G5 servers on wmware, on boot i have the following message: ----------------------------- Applying Intel Microcode update: don't know to make device "cpu/microcode" [OK] ----------------------------- and on a HP proliant DL360 G5 server , on boot i have too the following message: ----------------------------- Applying

On 6/29/07, Wojtek.Pilorz <wpilorz at bdk.pl> wrote: > On Fedora6, I have noted the folowing problems when using cifs to connect to > NT shares: > > - cp -vip does not copy mtime; tar x does copy mtime > (it seems setting modtime by fname does work, setting by handle does not) > - when there is a share mounted from a NT/2000 server which is not used for long time >

On 2001-10-26 at 13:35:50 Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at ubsw.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 02:11:13PM +0200, Markus Friedl wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 10:14:21AM +1000, Damien Miller wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Ed Phillips wrote: > > > > > > > What is the reasoning behind this? Do we want to see a lastlog entry for >

Hi, I am Wojtek Pilorz (username "Wojtek Pilorz"). I would like to discuss whether my method of creating Centos DVD image from CD images and the other way would be appropriate to be placed in tip named in subject; Would it be appropriate if I send scripts I use with method description a mail to the list for consideration? What I have is method for recreating bit-for-bit identical

I have recently migrated from an old, RedHat Linux 9 - based system (Aurox 9.2) to Centos 4.4. I am having trouble with vnc causing X unusable until reboot. By unusable I mean that X screen is either blank or blinking and moving, which is not cured by X restart until reboot. My system is: Compaq EVO D510 SFF CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.80GHz RAM: 256 MB Video: 00:02.0 VGA compatible

Outside the known 'Hang-on-exit' bug and the Solaris 'PAM_TTY_KLUDGE' required. *WHAT* other issues *MUST* be address before 3.0 which is approaching fast? Those running NeXTStep I need conformation that it works under NeXT. My current Slab is packed in a storage unit due to a fire in my apartment complex (happened above me so I'm wrapping up dealing with that crap =). -

Hello, I wondered how domain groups are handled with Samba (2.2.5): I set up a Samba DC and have serveral XP clients. On the Samba machine I greated a group named "ntadmins" and put the following line in my smb.conf: domain admin group = @ntadmins On of my domain admins is user "wojtek" which has the primary group "user" but is also memeber of the

Could everyone please test the latest snapshots as we will be making a new release soon. If you have any patches you would like us to consider, please resend them to the list ASAP. -d -- | Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> \ ``E-mail attachments are the poor man's | http://www.mindrot.org / distributed filesystem'' - Dan Geer

In short: Platform: linux with 2.4 kernel Version: rsync 2.6.6 Command line: rsync266 -av -W --bwlimit=1 /mnt/somedir/rsync-2.6.6.tar.gz ./ Destination: local disk Source: file on a smbfs mounted filesystem; share is exported on a NT 4.0 workstation over a very slow and unstable link Result: Rsync completes operation with no special message, but the resulting file is damaged, large

Dear Sir/Ma'am: It is significantly beneficial to your library and its patrons to have a book titled "Complete Conduct Principles for the 21st Century" by Dr. John Newton. Please suggest to your local library(ies) that the book be purchased. This is a great contribution you can make to your neighborhood! "I find it heartening that you are crusading on behalf of this

Dear Sir/Ma'am: It is significantly beneficial to your library and its patrons to have a book titled "Complete Conduct Principles for the 21st Century" by Dr. John Newton. Please suggest to your local library(ies) that the book be purchased. This is a great contribution you can make to your neighborhood! "I find it heartening that you are crusading on behalf of this

Back in August, several of us participated in a discussion about getting a more robust memory dependence analysis framework into LLVM. Wojtek Matyjewicz has done some work on this and he attached a patch to an e-mail at the time that built against an older version of LLVM. Wojtek, what's the status of this patch? Does it build against HEAD? Do you plan to check it in any time soon?

If anyone is interested in this topic, I filled a bug here: http://llvm.org/bugs/post_bug.cgi 2012/11/9 Wojciech Daniło <wojtek.danilo.ml at gmail.com> > I have noticed that I was installing LLVM according to: > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#getting-started > so it was no the 3.1 but the 3.2 version from svn (trunk 167573). > Maybe in the svn, not stable version,

On Jan 14, 2009, at 9:37 AM, David Greene wrote: > Back in August, several of us participated in a discussion about > getting a > more robust memory dependence analysis framework into LLVM. Wojtek > Matyjewicz has done some work on this and he attached a patch to an > e-mail at > the time that built against an older version of LLVM. > > Wojtek, what's the status

>> how to disable throttling (or better - put other limits) for 127.0.0.1? > > https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Upgrading/2.3 - look for "Localhost Auth Penalty" > that's certainly this. but i am not an expert in this passdb system my current config is passdb { driver=passwd-file args= username_format=%Lu /usr/local/etc/dovecot/aliasy } passdb { driver = pam #