Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "efficiently synchronizing source and destination"
2007 Jan 01
1
How can I know the amount of data transferred .
Hi .
I'm using the command 'rsync -avqHlogpDtW" on daily bases and I'd like
to know how much data transferred from source to target .
Lior
Best Regards,
Lior Michael
* +972-50-5455013
* mailto:liorm@hp.com
Our goal is that we will have a VERY SATISFIED customers.
For any feedback Please contact either me or my manager Yosi Barkan at +972-50-7200775
-------------- next
2006 Jun 20
1
Windows 2003, Cygwin, and rsync
I just installed Cygwin / OpenSSH / rsync on two Dell PowerVault 745N
NASes running Windows 2003 Appliance Edition. My rsync daemons are
running, ssh works, and in theory all is well. But... I'm getting an
average of maybe 15 Mb/s rsyncing between them.
Now, I know I have an issue in the way they're connected... one is
attached to a Cisco 2970 (1 Gb/s), which is attached to a NetGear
2002 Nov 12
2
rsync for /etc/passwrd /etc/samba/passwd
Can somebody give me a quick education on sync'ing users, passwords and
groups between 2 linux servers. Im using Redhat 7.1 as PDC and BDC using
Samba. I want to sync mainly /etc/passwd, /etc/smbpasswd, /etc/group to
get a consistancy going in the domain...
please guide me sync'ing passwords between them ..BOTH WAYS.....if a
user changes a password on one computer it gets changed on
2005 Oct 20
2
rsync deleting directories when synchronizing
We have an odd problem with the rsync 2.6.6. When we issue
rsync -vvrLxHpogDtSP server::image/ /
it deletes certain directories.
We're sync'ing to / because we don't know ahead of time which files will
appear on the server. For example, some init scripts get populated into
the rsync module, appearing ultimately as
server::image/etc/init.d/script, but we don't know ahead of
2003 Mar 25
0
Multiple source synchronizing to one unique destination
Hello,
I am wondering if there's a Rsync guru, that can just simply tell me if the
following thing is feasible with rsync 2.5.6.
I have 2 rsync source servers configured as daemon....and I would like both
of them to synchronize to a unique destination.
Fact is that when I do a synchronization one after another, both source ar
populated on the destination area (provided that the --delete
2003 Dec 12
0
Synchronizing to multiple locations on a single destination serve r
Hi all.
This has been bugging me for quite some time and I haven't found a solution
yet. I was wondering
if anyone has any experience with similar scenarios or/and can tell me how
this process can be
optimized.
We use rsync to synchronize JAR libraries on our remote server. The catch
here is, that the
libraries must go in multiple locations (and not all the locations have all
the
2003 Dec 15
0
Synchronizing to multiple locations on a single destination s erve r
Steve Bonds wrote:
> If the destination server is the same you should be able to copy the
> files
> over to one common directory and either symlink or hard-link them from
> the
> final destinations.
>
> For example, on the destination server:
>
> /opt/app-name/lib/:
> contains all 4 libraries needed
>
> /opt/app1/lib/:
> contains symlinks to
2003 Jan 14
3
Live DB backups with rsync?
Is it possible to do live backups of a running DB with rsync???
I was just talking to livevault.com & they (only on win boxes) say they
can grab changes from a client's live DB & sync them remotely.
It sounded like BS to me, but I'm neither a DB guy or sync'ing expert.
Steve Mallett
[virtio-dev] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
2018 Jun 25
3
[virtio-dev] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
On 6/22/2018 5:17 PM, Siwei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Siwei Liu <loseweigh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 02:51:11PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
[virtio-dev] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
2018 Jun 26
2
[virtio-dev] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:54:09AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>> > > > > Might not neccessarily be something wrong, but it's very limited to
>> > > > > prohibit the MAC of VF from changing when enslaved by failover.
>> > > > You mean guest changing
2002 Nov 05
1
"Doh!", or: The Sync'ing Feeling I Get With Recursion
This message describes (imho) a behaviour bug in rsync. I'm going
to submit a patch, but before I dive into the code I want to know what the
actual desired behaviour should be. In other words, please comment.
I have some directories I want to keep synchronised between two
machines (call them "master" and "backup").
Every now and then someone deletes a file on
[virtio-dev] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
2018 Jun 26
2
[virtio-dev] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 04:50:25 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:54:09AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> > > > > > Might not neccessarily be something wrong, but it's very limited to
> > > > > > prohibit the MAC of VF from changing when enslaved by failover.
> > > > > You
2002 Oct 09
5
Value too large for defined data type
Howdy,
I am just starting to use rsync and now have an rsync server set up
to back up our
various machines. I recently started getting an error that is confusing and
I can't find info
documented on it. I searched the news group and found it mentioned but no
solution yet.
I get the error when sync'ing from a Solaris 8 machine to my Solaris 8
server.
stat
2013 Jun 21
1
fasttrack mirror server out of sync?
I don't know if it's useful to report this: (& who should I report it to?)
# yum update
[...]
* base: mirrors.ircam.fr
* extras: mirrors.ircam.fr
* fasttrack: mirror.ovh.net
* remi-ff: rpms.famillecollet.com
* updates: centosq3.centos.org
base | 3.7 kB 00:00
cr | 2.9 kB 00:00
extras | 3.4 kB 00:00
fasttrack | 3.4 kB 00:00
Not using downloaded repomd.xml
[virtio-dev] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
2018 Jun 27
2
[virtio-dev] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Introduce VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY feature bit to virtio_net
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 5:29 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 04:38:26PM -0700, Siwei Liu wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 6:50 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:54:09AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>> >> > > > > Might not neccessarily be something
2014 Dec 17
1
Differing behaviour on consecutive runs
Hi all. I have a strange issue with sync'ing from a USB-attached ext4
file system on one machine, to a USB-attached ext3 file system on another.
The sync works fine (a few thousand files). If I run it again straight
away, or a few minutes later, rsync reports no action required.
But if I wait for a few hours and run it again it copies all the files
again.
I'm trying to determine
2006 Dec 29
1
How to improve speed of a single file transfer over an unstable link?
Long time fan and user of rsync, with a question. First some background...
What I'm trying to do is copy a 21GB backup file from my parent's house to
my home to help them with their new computer. But the link is sporadic,
thus a continous copy will not succeed. The session dies after 25mins - 2
hours.
Thus, I've scripted the following script 'get_me.sh'
#!/bin/sh
mv
2018 May 03
2
samba 4 joining samba 3 pdc - group mismatch
On Thu, 3 May 2018 19:18:45 +0100
Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2018 14:59:18 -0300
> "Ethy H. Brito via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > I run the pdbedit command.
> > I got a lage amount of users (and groups).
> > The admin of the S3 server deleted (userdel) 75 users and these are
>
2018 May 03
2
samba 4 joining samba 3 pdc - group mismatch
On Thu, 3 May 2018 17:35:25 +0100
Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> > > No, you should get the same UID on the Unix domain member at all
> > > times, it will just be a different on to the PDC.
> >
> > I get the same uid all time but not the one I expect.
> > I'd expect that idmap return "UNIX_UID + LOW_RANGE_ID"
2013 Aug 03
1
sync re-copies emails assigning new UIDs
Hi,
I have been (attempting) to transition a company from in-house dovecot 1.x
to a hosted dovecot 2.2 setup.
I am running the doveadm sync command, and for the four mailboxes have been
blocked -- sync'ing seem to be copying the same mails, over and over (note,
initially I was using doveadm backup but my reading has indicated that
'doveadm sync' is better)
Example:
# date