similar to: Rsync resource consumption, whilst building a large file list

I have FreeBSD-6.1 and it appears the default installation has a full complement of Kerberos5. But, /usr/src/kerberos5/README states: This subtree is world-exportable, as it does not contain any cryptographic code. At the time of writing, it did not even contain source code, only Makefiles and headers. Please maintain this "exportable" status quo. Thanks!

For the last few system builds, I've noticed that the variable in /etc/make.conf NO_MAILWRAPPER=true is being ignored, resulting in my sendmail (different than stock version) being overwritten. This applies to 4.8-STABLE; is this a known issue.

I'm getting this error from time-to-time when using VI under FreeBSD_4.9-prerelease: Error: input: Resource temporarily unavailable Basically, VI just exits/crashes (no core dump). The load average is pretty low: 4:18PM up 10 days, 23:42, 4 users, load averages: 0.13, 0.21, 0.21 And I don't seem to have any other problems with the system. Wondering what this might be, or if

I wonder if anyone has tried using an IMAP server with Amazon S3 as a backend. There would be many factors to consider (speed, etc). However, moreso, I don't know that Maildir(++) would support multiple folders that might be linked into the cloud. For example, higher-I/O local incoming mail is on disk, some folders archived on S3. Could be easily done by simply creating another

I've had a problem with 4.8-STABLE whereby a new system build/install appears to nudge out the module File::Spec (perhaps others), which I usually have to reinstall every time. I'm curious about what's happening here, why, etc. Thanks.

Why would this be happening, and how can I fix this - the man subsystem hasn't been working because of this for a while. This is FreeBSD-4.9-Prerelease: # gdb man man GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"...(no debugging symbols found)... /usr/share/tmac/man: No such file or directory. And when I go to run a manpage, I sometimes get this

No this is not another of the "What hardware do I need?" posts.. :) Just wondering if anyone has calculated the memory consumprion for running asterisk.. For example, when its idle it uses U MB or RAM, uses V MB for each active Zap channel, W MB for each active SIP channel, X MB for each active IAX Channel and Y MB for each VM channel.. I often read posts where guys are throwing

Hello, Yesterday I posted about how to email from a worker. I decided to be a bit piggy and just inhale all of rails. Sorted. I am noticing some rather ominous behavior though. The setup: My worker takes an uploaded image as a param and passes it (via system call) to a C++ image processing engine. Take a look at these memory consumption figures for successive runs uploading the identical image

Hi, I’m trying to work out the behavior of llvm-mca on instructions with ProcResGroups. My current understanding is: When an instruction requests a port group (e.g., HWPort015) and all of its atomic sub-resources (e.g., HWPort0,HWPort1,HWPort5), HWPort015 is marked as “reserved” and is issued in parallel with HWPort0, HWPort1, and HWPort5, blocking future instructions from reserving HWPort015

I did ./configure make make install I got no errors, but it doesn't seem to have installed everything I need. Swat won't start. It didn't put an smb.conf file in /etc/samba (it didn't even create this folder) or /usr/local/samba/lib/. When I run testparm, I get Segmentation fault as my only output. Even if I create an smb.conf and run testparm on that file I get the exact

> On May 9, 2020, at 5:12 PM, Andrea Di Biagio via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The llvm scheduling model is quite simple and doesn't allow mca to accurately simulate the execution of individual uOPs. That limitation is sort-of acceptable if you consider how the scheduling model framework was originally designed with a different goal in mind (i.e. machine

I'm using 2.6.3pre1 to transfer a rather large Debian archive (126GB, more than 30 million files). It contains about 450 daily snapshots, where unchanged files are hardlinked between the snapshots (so many files have hunderds of links). It's been running for some time now, and I found that while it's far from done, it's already used 165GB on the receiving end. Investigation shows

Hi We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and gcc 4.12. The working directory is on a remote machine and is either a Samba share or a Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a Windows 7 share the resulting executable has the sticky bit set in group: On Windows 7 share: -rwxrwSrwx 1 <snip> myapp On Samba share: -rwxrwx--x+ 1 <snip> myapp The

Hi Alex, On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 4:00 PM Alex Renda <renda at csail.mit.edu> wrote: > Thanks, that’s very helpful! > > > > Also, sorry for the miscue on that bug with the 2/4 cycles — I realize now > that that’s an artifact of a change that I made to not crash when resource > groups overlap without all atomic subunits being specified: > > `echo 'fxrstor

Hi, this is my first pos here, please be lenient. My problem shuld be a FAQ and, in fact I found a lot of references googling around, but nothing could really solve my problem, so here I am. I have a Samba server: Very basic wheezy amd64 installation on a small VIRTUAL server (Xen). Only fancy thing is direct access to a couple of RAID1 (mirror) arrays where data is stored. I normally access

Hi folks. This message may be a bit verbose and not as techie as the ones I''ve seen in this list, but describing the scenario will save a lot of messages. Scenario: A building with 17 floors, each floor with 24 offices (totals 408 offices) connected to the backbone through a border switch (1 vlan for each office). The offices can lease bandwidth of 64k, 128k, 256k, 512k, 1M and 2Mbps,

I have a CentOS 3.8 server which i manage for web hosting (web server, mail server + database server). Today i got it down because of an attack, here is the last snapshot of top command before server dies 09:47:30 up 21 days, 6:54, 1 user, load average: 363.88, 727.82, 253.42 3949 processes: 135 sleeping, 3800 running, 14 zombie, 0 stopped CPU states: cpu user nice system irq

Hi, Does anybody know if row.name = FALSE actually works in v2.6.2? Because it isn't working for me... here is some sample code and output: ====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+====+ > print(x,row.names = FALSE) party_abbr candidate_name votes_candidate 2 DFL AMY KLOBUCHAR 1,278,849 5 R MARK KENNEDY 835,653 4 IP

I've got RedHat 7.1 and when I downloaded the SRPM for openssh-2.9p2-1.src.rpm and tried to rpm --recompile it bombed. Here's the error message that it generated: + pushd x11-ssh-askpass-1.2.0 /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/openssh-2.9p2/x11-ssh-askpass-1.2.0 /usr/src/redhat/BUILD/openssh-2.9p2 + xmkmf -a imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config make Makefiles Makefile:1052: *** target

Hi .. I tried to exclude certain objects from my search, by adding appropriate term queries .. i = Ferret::Index::Index.new i.field_infos.add_field(:type, :index => :untokenized, :term_vector => :no) i << {:type => "Movie", :name => "Indiana" } i << {:type => "Movie", :name => "Forrest" } i << {:type =>