similar to: non-existing parent directories - continued

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 400 matches similar to: "non-existing parent directories - continued"

2009 Sep 07
0
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
Edwin, thanks, it starts making sense inline comments... Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-09-06 19:57, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > >> Edwin, >> >> thank you for your effort, but I'm not sure I understand. >> Are you describing a graph traversal problem? Is the data model stored >> in a predecessor/successor fashion, which requires you to 'walk' the
2009 Sep 06
3
[LLVMdev] Graphviz and LLVM-TV
On 2009-09-06 19:57, Ioannis Nousias wrote: > Edwin, > > thank you for your effort, but I'm not sure I understand. > Are you describing a graph traversal problem? Is the data model stored > in a predecessor/successor fashion, which requires you to 'walk' the > graph in order to visit all nodes? (and what happens when you have > disjointed DFGs?). Sorry for the
2008 Dec 27
1
indexed expression
Hello expeRts, I need generate symbolize the autocovariances matrix of a Gaussian ARMA(1,1), for derivate it and evaluate. I try this codes, but whitout sucess vacv<-NULL vacv[1]<-1-2*phi*theta-theta^2 vacv[2]<-(1-phi*theta)*(phi-theta) vacv[3:n]<-acv[2]*(phi^(1:(n-2))) facv<-list() for(i in 1:2)
2012 Jun 02
0
[LLVMdev] DFG of machine functions
I tried debugging it and the issue seems to be in the implementation of MachineInstrIterator.h and the way it interacts with GraphWriter.h functions. I found this by replacing the ( template <> struct GraphTraits<MCDFGraph<MachineFunction*> >) with a similar MCDFGraph based template of CFG similar to the one in MachineFunction.h (similarly replacing the DOTGraphTraits with the
2018 Aug 30
0
Wrong battery.date variable value [APC, usbhid-ups]
Hi Charles, The battery.mfr.date is actually the correct value I'm looking for. That is the exact date the battery was last replaced. And yes, it is the correct value displayed in apcupsd. For the debug commands, is there a line break between "upsdrvctl stop" and "/usr/local/libexec/nut/usbhid-ups -a APC_BR1500GI -DDDDD 2>&1 | tee /tmp/APC_BR1500GI.debug.txt"?
2012 May 31
2
[LLVMdev] DFG of machine functions
Hi, I am trying to generate the DFG of machine functions. Initially, I added a pass to generate the DFG of LLVM IR functions. This was based on the mail thread - http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-September/025582.html. This pass worked fine and I was able to generate DFG of LLVM IR functions. Later, I ported the DFG pass code for machine functions. I ported the InstIterator.h
2008 Jul 09
0
[LLVMdev] DFG?
Hello, I'm going to need something like a DFG of a loop. I've been studying the ScalarEvolution analysis and it performs many of the functions I need (it's something like a DFG, going recursively backwards), but I need something that indicates me when a instruction has to be before another, or can be switched. As I said in a previously message, my idea is to match the instructions
2011 Jul 01
0
[LLVMdev] Generating DFG or CDFG from C code
Hi Andrew, Thanks for the response. That helps a lot. So that means I have to implement a pass, right ? Sorry for dumb question. I just started LLVM today.   =========================================== Phone : 82-42-860-1838 Fax : 82-42-860-6790 Cell Phone: 82-10-7599-1981 =========================================== --- On Thu, 6/30/11, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote:
2011 Jul 01
1
[LLVMdev] Generating DFG or CDFG from C code
Unless someone else responds with "I've already done that" then you need to implement a pass. It's probably something you want to customize to your needs anyway. -Andy On Jun 30, 2011, at 11:50 PM, janarbek wrote: > Hi Andrew, > Thanks for the response. That helps a lot. > > So that means I have to implement a pass, right ? Sorry for dumb question. I just started
2005 Aug 11
2
question
Hi, I have a problem with R, after an update: this piece of code: cat("creating resolver data frame\n"); dfG<-cbind(dfG,2^(RGN$G)) dfR<-cbind(dfR,2^(RGN$R)) suddenly, creates values to inf. Is the syntax changed for the ^ symbol in the latest R downloadable version? Kind regards, wilfred -- Dr. Ir. Wilfred Van IJcken Labmanager Genomics Erasmus Center for Biomics,
2010 Apr 14
2
timeout problem
I found the response below today online to a question I had. For some reason I never got the mail. I am not quite clear on what "DHCP + DFG + 2DNS entries" means when calculating the IP to set for the router: Thanks Re: [CentOS] Yum/WGET/HTTP sourceforge etc. new April 12, 2010 08:10AM On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 22:57 +0000, tony.chamberlain at lemko.com wrote: > Here is what I
2016 Jan 12
2
Register data flow commits
Hi, I commited several patches today that implement a framework that enables data-flow optimizations on the post-RA (post-SSA) representation. I thought I'd say a few words about what it is. The code is currently under lib/Target/Hexagon, but there intent for it from the beginning was to be target-independent. The motivation for it came from our (Hexagon) experience with customer
2016 Jun 18
2
data flow graph
Dear professor John Criswell I would like to implement a new instruction scheduling algorithm so that I need the Data flow graph(DFG) is input of the algorithm. Thanks Huy From: John Criswell [mailto:jtcriswel at gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 1:25 AM To: huyite; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] data flow graph Dear Huyite, Your question, as
2011 Jul 01
0
[LLVMdev] Generating DFG or CDFG from C code
Hi All, I am reposting my question again since i think my question was not clear enough. I am wondering is it possible to generate Control Data Flow Graph from C using LLVM? or is it possible to get web-like structure of C code using llvm / Thanks in advance, Any comment suggestion would be appreciated. Jan Ma.   =========================================== --- On Thu, 6/30/11, janarbek
2012 Oct 03
0
[LLVMdev] can I print DFG for IR
Hi, I have been trying my hand on writing a simple traversal of the graph node. I see the opt can print me a CFG for a given IR, is there some tool which i can use to print a DFG (data-flow graph) for the IR ? thanks and regards Tarique -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2007 Oct 04
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
On 4 Oct 2007, at 00:22, Evan Cheng wrote: >> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86) >> LLCBETAOPTION := -regalloc=local -fast -tail-call-opt -tail-call-opt- >> align-stack > Please remove -regalloc=local -fast. We want to test this patch > separately. just did a test with LLCBETAOPTION := -tail-call-opt -tail-call-opt-align-stack this time only SPASS llc-beta fails (comparing with vanilla
2016 Jun 16
2
data flow graph
Dear all, Please help me to generate DFG(Data flow graph) in LLVM. Best regards, Huy Mobile: +84942976091 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160616/29fea8f8/attachment.html>
2011 Jul 01
2
[LLVMdev] Generating DFG or CDFG from C code
On Jun 30, 2011, at 10:05 PM, janarbek wrote: > > Hi All, > I am reposting my question again since i think my question was not clear enough. > I am wondering is it possible to generate Control Data Flow Graph from C using LLVM? or is it possible to get web-like structure of C code using llvm / > > Thanks in advance, > Any comment suggestion would be appreciated. > >
2012 Nov 03
2
[LLVMdev] Building a data flow graph from instructions in BasicBlock
Hi All, I want to build a DFG from instructions in a basic block. I couldn't find a function to find the depenencies between instructions. How can i do that ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121103/cd67e510/attachment.html>
2007 Oct 04
1
[LLVMdev] RFC: Tail call optimization X86
On Oct 4, 2007, at 2:31 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > > On 4 Oct 2007, at 00:22, Evan Cheng wrote: >>> ifeq ($(ARCH),x86) >>> LLCBETAOPTION := -regalloc=local -fast -tail-call-opt -tail-call- >>> opt- >>> align-stack >> Please remove -regalloc=local -fast. We want to test this patch >> separately. > > just did a test with >