similar to: resolving difference in interface between rsync and cp/rcp/scp

Chris Lattner wrote: > Patches welcome. Please send a patch, or even just some suggested > text, and we'll be happy to include it. Remember that the people who > usually end up writing the FAQ's already know all the answers, so it's > hard for us to see things from fresh perspectives sometimes :) > > -Chris > Actually, my request for more info in the

Erick Tryzelaar wrote: > Actually, my request for more info in the "Getting Started" had some > hidden questions, as I don't know the answer to them :) So to be a > little more clear, here are the two I had: > > Does the gcc4 no longer need the "fixheaders" script that the gcc3.4 > frontends uses? > > Is it possible to install both the gcc4 and

Hi All, I am looking for SCP or RCP standards. I searched on the web but I am not able to find the standards. Please mail me the link where I can find the standards for SCP or RCP. Thanks, Abhijeet

lcs for language compiling system? It's a suggestive of the old name, easy to remember, easy to say, and seems to be easy to google. Advanced could be prepended to it to make it alcs to make it even more unique. -e

IF ssh is a replacement for rlogin,rsh etc I can accept it respecting rlogin=false as rlogin does and rsh does not, however scp is a replacement for rcp, and rcp does NOT use rlogin attribute, so the implementation is NOT standard as scp fails if rlogin=false, but rcp succeeds, as documented. thanks mark

I got used to rsync's -v --progress option so much that I used it instead of rcp even to simply copy files across the network. I dont like software that doesnt talk to me! :-) I like the percentage bar that --progress gives! To my surprise, I found that, when dealing with 1GB+ files, rsync is 4-5 _times_ slower than rcp. Yes, I know that rsync is optimized for sending deltas to a file

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1337 Summary: SCP performance twice as slow as RCP Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8.1p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: scp AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

On 30 Oct 2003, aslan@io.com wrote: > > I was hoping that since you guys are the authors to rsync that > you could answer a simple question for me. > > I'm trying to transfer files via the rsh/rexec protocol by > remotely executing a cat command, i.e. "cat > foo.txt" > and then sending data through the socket to the stdin of the remote > process. This all

I've pretty much finished exposing all I wanted to llvm-c and the ocaml bindings for the soon to be released 2.7. Does anyone need any other functions exposed before the code freeze on the 7th?

On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Red Cricket wrote: > I have had this in my .bashrc for years: > > alias scp='rsync -avzP' Similar, though I named it rcp because nobody has the real rcp installed any more, but sometimes I need scp to connect to systems that lack rsync. https://evolvis.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=shellsnippets/shellsnippets.git;a=blob;f=mksh/rcp;hb=HEAD >

Does this give correct results for special floats (0, infs)? We tried to improve (for single floats) x86 rcp in llvmpipe with newton-raphson, but unfortunately not being able to give correct results for these two cases (without even more additional code) meant it got all disabled in the end (you can still see that code in the driver) since the problems are at least as bad as those due to bad

Why can the local and remote paths be sanitized? Regards, Uri > On Jul 31, 2020, at 19:57, Ethan Rahn <ethan.rahn at gmail.com> wrote: > > ?I wanted to bring this up again due to: > https://github.com/cpandya2909/CVE-2020-15778/. This showcases a clear > issue with scp which it sounds like cannot be fixed without breaking scp. > This seems like it would lend some impetus

Hi, We have implemented the rcp instruction generation for X86 target architecture. We have introduced a flag -fp-rcp flag which controls the generatation of X86 rcp instruction generation. We have observed minor effects on precision and hence hve put these transformations under the mentioned flag. Note that -fp-rcp is only enabled with -enable-unsafe-fp-math flag presently. Moreover we have

When you require a scp copy of more than 1 file to a destination that is not a directory, scp copy the last input file to the destination (version openssh-3.8.1p1). Thus if you forget to specify the destination, the last file is _silently destroyed_. I know that rcp exhibits the same behaviour but cp and rsync don't do anything in that case and _kindly_ warn you that you made a mistake:

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #588| |ok+ Flag| | --- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org>

So just to add to this conversation, I *too* was thinking about rewriting the build system :) I've been writing a new build system from the ground up, and I was hoping to see how my system would work against llvm. I wanted to make sure that I understand the licensing issues. I'm releasing my build system using just a standard BSD license, which is compatible with llvm's license, right?

I'm in the process of finishing up the ocaml llvm bindings, and I had some last minute questions before we code freeze: 1. What version of ocaml is everyone using, and how old of an ocaml version do you need to support? 2. Would it be alright if I renamed some functions? Module providers are being removed for 2.7. I can keep the old functions around, but I'd prefer to keep the API clean.

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2003-06-04 23:28

[Mod: This is a misconfiguration of a site. nobody''s uid should not be -1 -- alex] When playing around with rcp on Linux, we found something interesting, that we haven''t seen mentioned on bugtraq before: SUMMARY: Root privileges can be obtained by user nobody with uid 65535 by exploiting a problem with /usr/bin/rcp. Many applications are running as ''nobody'',

This is a small bug fix for the ocaml build system that allows for dependencies to be generated for ocaml interface files. --- bindings/ocaml/Makefile.ocaml | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 7c62c2cd93a6402e5f6ebd600e9e3ac7851b4d29.diff Type: text/x-patch Size: 994 bytes Desc: not