Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "RSYNC protocol"
2006 Aug 27
0
Protocol
I am looking for someone who knows the rsync protocol byte specifics, so
I can write the documentation for the file list and file data transfer
parts of the protocol. I have already written a simple explanation of
the protocol handshake, and I would really like for the end result to be
place with the code or on the website.
I have attached what I have written so far, a rough draft of what I
2005 Jun 19
1
rsync version 2.6.3 protocol version 28 - hosts allow dows not work
Hello all. Rsync rocks, however I am having problems with two things:
1. The hosts allow directive does not allow the use of a hostname. (DNS is
working for I can do a NSLOOKUP on the hostname and it resolves). If I put
the IP address it works fine, problem is that we run DHCP at the office
and my lease expires every 4 days.
2. Rsync is not logging to /var/log/rsyncd.log.
The following is my
2020 Jan 09
0
Relicensing Xapian
This is an update on the current status of the relicensing, but also an
opportunity to give feedback. Sorry it's rather long, but I think it's
necessary to summarise the situation - there are probably list members
who weren't even born at the start of the history of this!
Xapian is currently licensed as GPLv2+, but isn't something we actually
chose for Xapian, but rather due to a
2009 Apr 27
1
[Code study]should we remove if (motd && *motd) section?
Dear List,
I'm confused when we will run into "if (motd && *motd)"?
As I have found that Globals is set 0 during initialization, and I
didn't find anywhere else assign the value.
If so, should we remove this section?
Or there might be some where I missed? Please correct me, if I'm wrong.
Thanks in advance.
clientserver.c #line 147~160
> if (!am_client) {
2016 Jan 24
0
LGPL relicense port of rsync
>
>
> >
> > > I guess I could write an initial protocol specification - but it would
> > > not be complete and I wouldn't be able to relicense my library to
> > > LGPL anyway.
> > >
> > > So I guess I have convinced myself that it is not worth the effort
> > > trying. Time is probably better spent coding ;) And that's OK
2011 Nov 29
2
template does not print variables
Hello list,
I am having a problem with template file. Why are variables not interpolated?
[root@puppet manifests]# cat /etc/motd
memory free = <%= memoryfree %>
domain = <%= domain %>
operating system = <%= operatingsystem %>
This is the template file
[root@puppet manifests]# cat ../templates/motd.erb
memory free = <%= memoryfree %>
domain = <% domain %>
2009 Feb 20
1
Getting "poll: protocol failure in circuit setup" from rsh
Hi all,
I inherited a cpu-stats script from the previous *nixadmin at our
department. This script relies on a rsh-command to get the vmstats from the
remote machines and then using a perl script to push it to a web server.
Now I''ve just added a new machine running CentOS 5.2 x64 to the script and I
get the error message in the subject line; "poll: protocol failure in
circuit
2009 Apr 22
2
[Code study] lp_motd_file defination? Help
Dear List,
Currently, I read this in clientserver.c, line 148.
motd = lp_motd_file();
I have googled, but didn't the definition of char *lp_motd_file(void).
Can anyone help to explain the following code segment. Many thanks.
#line 147 ~ 160, in clientserver.c, version 3.0.5
> if (!am_client) {
> motd = lp_motd_file();
> if (motd && *motd) {
> FILE *f =
2017 Aug 10
5
Relicensing: Revised Developer Policy
On Aug 10, 2017, at 3:08 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Chris Lattner <clattner at llvm.org> writes:
>
>>> On Aug 10, 2017, at 2:59 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I can find old threads about it, but nothing saying why it was decided
>>> that
2016 Jan 08
0
LGPL relicense port of rsync
Am 07.01.2016 um 23:26 schrieb Per Lundqvist:
> Hi,
>
> I am maintaining a port of rsync (https://github.com/perlundq/yajsync)
> which is GPL:ed of course. The main purpose of the project is to
> provide a Java API library for the rsync protocol. It would
> therefore be really nice to be able to use LGPL as the license.
>
> But in order to do so I would first have to get a
2011 Apr 01
9
Puppet on Redhat 6
Hello
I have been using puppet for a while now, more or less successfully on
SLES 11 and CentOS 5.5
currently I am using puppet 2.6.6
I now am trying it out on redhat 6, and now i run into an problem with
even the simplest of modules/classes
The error I get is :
debug: /Stage[main]/Motd/File[/etc/motd]/content: Executing ''diff -u /
etc/motd
2016 Jan 24
2
LGPL relicense port of rsync
Hi Andrey,
2016-01-23 4:02 GMT+01:00 Andrey Gursky <andrey.gursky at e-mail.ua>:
...
> If they don't want to bother with just discussing, why would they take a
> big effort to claim? And your proposition for LGPL is not very
> different in opposite to BSD or public domain.
Yes, I agree. The risk of having a future lawsuit against my project
would be pretty small if I
2004 Mar 13
1
suppressing motd without decreasing verbosity
Is there a way to make the rsync client suppress the motd without
suppressing other messages when connecting to an rsync server? What I
want is to run rsync from cron and have it produce output only when
any files have been downloaded or deleted and whenever errors have
happened. Otherwise, I want it to be quiet. This doesn't seem to be
possible with rsync as of version 2.5.7.
When I use the
2016 Jan 23
0
LGPL relicense port of rsync
Hi,
from my point of view:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:48:09 +0100
Per Lundqvist <perlundq at gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> > Getting the approval for a relicensing I think the contributions to
> > rsync have to be analyzed in detail to approach a reasonable number of
> > contributors.
> >
> > I experienced that finding a responsible person that is willing to
>
2015 Oct 21
2
RFC: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:54:30PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> On Oct 19, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote:
>> >>>> 2) We could require new contributors to sign the Apache CLA.
>> >>>
>>
2020 Nov 10
1
Recommended Protocols?
On 10/11/20 1:52 pm, Nikolai Lusan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Mon, 2020-11-09 at 23:42 -0600, Raymond Herrera wrote:
> > For several years I have been running the following in a Linux
> > server.
>
> > Dovecot Version: 2.0.9
>
> > *IMAP:*
> > Connection Security: SSL/TLS
> > Port: 993
> > Authentication Method: Normal Password
> >
2010 Jun 28
4
Error 400 : could not find template
Hello,
I did make a stupid fault: not commiting changes to version control :-(
After the installation of puppet-dashboard, I added a recipe to add
report = true to puppet config files on clients.
Now all Puppet clients don''t update because of an error...
What can be the various reasons for an ''400'' error??
I guess it has something to do with rights.
Jun 28 09:52:36 pm
2016 Apr 21
5
[Bug 11866] New: rsync fails (failed to re-stat) when using double fuzzy + link-dest on renamed files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11866
Bug ID: 11866
Summary: rsync fails (failed to re-stat) when using double
fuzzy + link-dest on renamed files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.1
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component:
2015 Oct 21
3
RFC: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
On Oct 19, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg at britannica.bec.de> wrote:
>>>> 2) We could require new contributors to sign the Apache CLA.
>>>
>>> To me, this is the most acceptable option of the listed terms.
>>
>> Please explain: why?
>
> First part for me is that switching the code to a different license
> doesn't
2017 Sep 13
2
[RFC] Polly Status and Integration
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>
> On 09/13/2017 02:16 AM, C Bergström wrote:
>
> A completely non-technical point, but what's the current "polly" license?
> Does integrating that code conflict in any way with the work being done to
> relicense llvm?
>
>
> Good question. I discussed this explicitly with