similar to: Options of move files

Hi all, few days ago mongrel start crashing on one of my sites, i upgraded to latest version (1.0.1) but problem still exists. When i try to load page in browser random elements are missing or page is blank (empty html). In mongrel.log i''m getting: Mon Oct 22 01:10:47 +0200 2007: ERROR: stream closed Mon Oct 22 01:10:47 +0200 2007: ERROR: closed stream Mon Oct 22 01:10:47 +0200 2007:

----- Original Message ---- > From: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> > To: Ian FREISLICH <ianf@clue.co.za> > Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Robert Backhaus <robbak@robbak.com> > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:12:03 AM > Subject: Re: Packet corruption in re0 > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 10:43:22AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: >

Hi I have an umbalanced data set where I want to predict a binary variable Y. I want to do an under sampling by keeping all the 1 and taking just some of the 0 such as I'll have 90% of 0 and 10% of 1. Can u help me do that Thank u [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I use rsync regularly for backups of large trees, sometimes over low bandwidth links, and I would like to suggest a potentially major speedup under some circumstances, where files or folders are moved or renamed. The principle is simple : often people rename a file, or move it from one folder to another. Current behaviour (please correct me if I am wrong) is for wget to see this as a

Hi, i have to tranfer large files each 5-100 GB (mo-fri) over dsl line. unfortunately dsl lines are often not very stable and i got a broken pipe error. (dsl lines are getting a new ip if they are broken or at least after a reconnect every 24 hours) i had a script which detect the rsync error and restart the transmission. this means that if a file has transfered e.g. 80 % i start again from

Hello, I use rsync (among many other things) as an incremental backup tool. Every night I save /{home,etc,var} from several servers. On one of them we keep 52 weeks of system logs, so each time syslog is rotated all old syslog.x.gz (where x is between 1 and 213) change names. This impacts our backup transfers because the incremental snapshot now has to include all syslog.x.gz files even though

Mark, The patch seems to cause problems if there are any transfer interruptions (as mentioned in the comments in the patch). However, even on a retransfer, the earlier partially transferred file is not fixed, although the client appears to think the transfer has completed successfully. This appears to be a serious bug. Note: Both client and server have the inplace patch, and on Linux platforms

To the support team, I am getting confused while studying the manual of speex1.2 Beta 2. If audio frame capture and playback are used asynchronously then speex_echo_cancel() function is preferred that is simpler then speex_echo_cancellation() function. However when I go through the API manual, In section 5.4.4.1 It is mentioned that this function is deprecated. Please tell me the set of

Hi, Anybody knows how rsync transfer one single file if there is difference between the two files, will rsync re-transfer the whole file or only transfer the difference? In my experiment, i found rsync would retranster the whole file again if there's a difference. What I did were: I manually created a huge.txt (file size 100813288 ), run rsync command to transfer this file from server 1 to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2783 ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-06-10 12:40 ------- Rsync uses a large amount of CPU on the sending side due to the fact that the rsync algorithm is trading CPU and disk I/O to reduce network I/O (and using an encryption algorithm on top of that only makes the CPU that much higher, so using a daemon connection is less CPU

Hi all, wouldn't it be much more comfortable if rsync would delete every sent file just after completing the single file transfer? Thus one could transfer files that could be processed by the receiver and there get moved or deleted avter processing. With large directories and e.g. wireless connections rsync connection could break up and could be restarted without the possibility to

i have a sync that i do daily on my home directory home directory -> external drive A i recently got a bigger external drive (B) and move my backup file tree from drive A to drive B. i gave the new drive the same name as the old drive, so all of the file paths will look the same to the backup script. My daily sync usually takes 3 minutes. After moving the backup tree, the first sync took 20

While this is target information, it isn't actually part of the target today and doesn't use any part of the target code. Maybe some day we can use a target hook to initialize the data structures, but even then I feel like this really belongs in the core analysis library. Would there be any objections to just moving it into Analysis? Doing this would remove a seriously ugly layering

Hello rsyncers, I have long wished for a feature in rsync to detect files that have renamed on the sender side since the last time a sync was performed, and avoid transfering those files to the destination the same way it avoids transfering files that haven't changed. Example 1: a log directory (like /var/log) is backed up every day. Most of the time, rsync transfers very little data, but

On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Charles Davis <cdavis5x at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jul 4, 2013, at 10:22 PM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > > > 在 2013-7-4 下午8:53，"Charles Davis" <cdavis5x at gmail.com>写道： > > > > > > On Jul 4, 2013, at 1:43 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > > > > > LLVM is a modularized software system, so I hope

I have never taken a statistics class nor read a statistics text, but I am in dire need of help with a trivial data analysis problem for which I need to write a report in two hours. I have spent 10,000 hours of study in my field of expertise (high frequency noise-making plant biology) but I've always thought that statistics is something that can be mastered on short notice. Briefly, I have

On Jul 4, 2013, at 10:22 PM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > > 在 2013-7-4 下午8:53，"Charles Davis" <cdavis5x at gmail.com>写道： > > > > > > On Jul 4, 2013, at 1:43 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > > > > > LLVM is a modularized software system, so I hope it's was modularized, > > > And ELF.h is definitely belongs to Object by

I have the samba with AC DC running... that was fun...not. Debian Wheezy with backport, # samba --version Version 4.1.7-Debian and I am using BTRFS for the file systems. My issue. I have about 400gig of files that were shared with a samba the old way, security = user I was hoping I could just change the ownership recursively to be something standard, like root:sambashares and put it in the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4080 Summary: rsync can't find basis dirs with -n and nonexistent destination Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hello, While connecting to my voicemail, I noticed that Asterisk may perform some tasks isn't included in the options levels that currently played! For ex: I am listening to the main menu which asking me to press 1 for new messages, 2 change folders, 0 mailbox options which is OK for these numbers, but if I pressed 7 by mistake for example it will tell me "Message deleted" which it