similar to: Max number of files to transfer

Hello. I recently installed Rails on Gentoo, and did a "rails /var/www/localhost/htdocs/parallel_bible/" just to test. Everything *seemed* to work fine, but when I clicked on the "View your Application''s Environment" link, this happens (screenshot attached): http://thegoban.com/rorerror.png Any ideas? Is this normal? I know it''s not actually stopping me

For me, rsync is an indispensable tool. I don't know what I'd do without it. Rsync and OpenSSH make our open systems possible. Of course, we wouldn't NEED them so much if we had better distributed file systems, but let's keep this an upbeat message. :-) I'd like to thank Andrew and Paul for giving birth to it, Wayne for nurturing it, and everyone else for providing

Folks, Came across a reproduceable fault with HP's latest version of Samba which is based on 3.0.28 code.....wouldn't surprise me if this has been fixed in later versions. Did a new install last week on OpenVMS 8.4 for a customer to run his CMS on. We can write several thousand files no problem, but when it comes to manipulating the modified date on each of the files samba will choke on

I've gone through the CVS commit log and tried to get every user-visible change since 2.4.6, so that we can make a proper announcement for 2.4.7. Please let me know if anything is missing/inaccurate. At this stage I'm planning to release two 2.4.7pre tarballs, one with the "large nohang patch" and one without. Some people inside VA will be stress-testing both, and so we can

I'm finding curl's [http://curl.sourceforge.net/] --interface option useful. It lets you specify which network interface to use. It's handy if you have a slow interface and a fast one, and you want to force traffic over the fast one. I'm running an older version of AIX that doesn't make it convenient to change the default interface, and doesn't load-balance over

Hey everyone, I am a final semester MCA student. I've chosen rsync as the subject of my project for my graduation. Hence I would appreciate it if someone could guide me with some ideas on how I can contribute to rsync. I will work hard to implement whatever suggestions that you can all give me. I would definitely like to know what are some of the issues concerning rsync. May be I can then

Hello, I'd like to introduce myself, my company, and our upcoming use of LLVM. My name is John Reagan. I've been working on compilers and assemblers since 1983 (yes, 31 years). Most of that time was spent on compilers for VAX/VMS (later renamed to OpenVMS), then OpenVMS on Alpha, and OpenVMS on Itanium. I've also worked with the HP NonStop platform and was directly involved

Hi all, I have two queries regarding WINE. 1) Is there support for VMS(OpenVMS) and MAC OS in WINE. I mean that can I install/build WINE over OpenVMS OS and MAC OS. 2) I have heard that WINE doesnot have support for WIN64 bit API's. Is this true that I cannot port WIN64 applications via WINE on Linux 64 bit. If this is possible for anyone among you then plz list the name of all the OS where

Given the increasing reliance on proxies and filtering devices, it is harder and harder to rsync across the net. Do you think we will ever be able to use http as a transport for rsync? For example, when will I be able to do this: rsync -arv http://rsync.domain.tld/webroot It would seem that this is the logical next step for rsync and is the one feature I most desparately need. What

I'm writing a wrapper around a large number of rsyncs that need to happen, and it would be great if I could parse the output of a running rsync and find out how far along it is. To do this, I would need to know how many files the rsync is going to transfer. If I run 'rsync -avz --progress', it tells me how many files it is considering, but not how many it actually needs to update.

I just installed Samba for VMS (1.9.17p4) on a DecServer 1000A running VMS 7.1 The University Network is primarily NT Server 4.0 SP5. My experience is with Netware and NT, not with VMS, but I have the luck of supporting the system..... My main question is about Encrypted Passwords.....Does this release of Samba support them, or do I have to modify the clients who want access to our Alpha to

Logically, deleting the dst file which does not exist on src amounts to "transferring the non-existence" of that file from src to dst. Therefore, if files larger or smaller than some size are ignored in transfer, they must just as well be ignored in deleting (much as --exclude'd files are also excluded from delete, unless you specify --delete-excluded). So I think the behavior should

As one of the OS' without current CMake support, I'm closely watching this discussion. We currently have LLVM 3.4.2 hosted on OpenVMS Itanium (as a host only, x86 target) using configure/make with little hassle. We plan to port CMake to OpenVMS, but that has been trickier than you'd think (others have tried, I haven't found anybody who has done it). Looks like I'll want to

Dear community, My company is interested in porting LLVM to OpenVMS. To do so, we need to look at extending the AMD64 calling convention to suit the existing calling conventions available on OpenVMS. We realize LLVM is a big and complex project and for some people who has not worked on it before, it's going to be a big and tough job that is going to take a lot of time. Still, the job has to

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:10:50PM +0000, Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev wrote: > It's my understanding that llvm-mc is intended to be a testing tool > for LLVM developers rather than an assembler for end users. Users > should be assembling with clang. Not all LLVM users are clang users. For example, we're using LLVM to build OpenVMS cross-compilers to x86 for our porting effort.

As part of our port of OpenVMS to x86-64, we are using LLVM with our own frontends on OpenVMS Itanium. We are writing a converter between our old backend's IR and the LLVM IR. We can cross-compile (hosted on OpenVMS Itanium) and link/execute on x86-64 CentOS. At present, we pass over 88% of our C test suite. Porting starts with being able to compile the code. Since we are stuck with a

Refer to this: https://legacyos.org/vsi-introduces-new-samba-release/ I noticed that VSI, the new owners of VMS, have created a package for Samba4 under OpenVMS. I also notice the samba-vms list appears to be abandoned (for years). So, I apologize for posting here on the general list, but it seemed fruitless trying the dedicated list. I am under the impression that the GPL v3 compels all

Yes. We currently build LLVM 3.4.2 on our OpenVMS Itanium box with an older EDG/Intel C++03 compiler to create legacy cross-compilers to our OpenVMS x86 box (well, VirtualBox). We do have a few tweaks to the relocations to access static data always through the GOT (including CodeGen's static data). Our linker sees references to code (which might be in 64-bit space) and creates trampolines

Hello, rsync.h is always including the syslog.h file, even though it is only used when the LOG_DAEMON macro is defined. Could someone change it to be as follows: #ifdef LOG_DAEMON #include <syslog.h> #endif OpenVMS currently does not have a syslog facility, so it does not have a syslog.h. Thank you, -John wb8tyw@qsl.net Personal Opinion Only

Hi all, We're at the point in our port of OpenVMS to x86-64 that we're working on the unwind code.  The current ABI and the current codebase doesn't have enough support for true asynchronous unwinding from any point (most notably in the prologue/epilogue) in the code that OpenVMS needs.  We're working on a set of changes to the compact unwind information to handle the additional