similar to: Problems synchronizing (error code 12)

Wayne, While testing rsync 2.6.8, I often receive broken pipe error, even though there is no network problem, between Active and Standby nodes. Please clarify. 2007/01/09 02:11:36 [1076] rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (342821 bytes received so far) [receiver] 2007/01/09 02:11:36 [1076] rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 84 bytes [generator]: Broken pipe (32) 2007/01/09

Yes this is another connection reset issue but all I am asking is some pointers on how I can possibly determine what and why this is happening. Its easy to say its a network issue but the bosses and clients want to know how to fix this said "network issue." I have read the rsync issues list. Some of what is suggested we might try HOWEVER we cannot duplicate the errors that occur and

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3979 Summary: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes phase send_file_entry broken pipe Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rsync wont synchronize some directories Hello, I'm trying to synchronize 2 servers. I set own module for each directory. Most of them do synchronize, but not the most important one with the 33Gb of date. I run truss in order to get the detailed output russ rsync -atlrpogHvv ilya@myip::public - - --password-file=/root/rsync_pass /home/public

Hello! I'm in trouble with rsync: I'm trying to: sudo rsync -atlrpogH --exclude-from=/usr/home/exclude ilya@myip::home --password-file=/root/rsync_pass /usr/home/ it does sync some files, but then it stops and outputs these errors: rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes [generator]: Operation not permitted (1) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at

I've trying to do a backup from a remote host to a local machine via rsync using the following configuration: Remote host (Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES3): $ uname -srmpi Linux 2.4.21-47.EL i686 athlon i386 $ cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 8) $ rsync --version rsync version 2.6.8 protocol version 29 Local machine (Mac OS X 10.4.8, Intel): $

Hi, we''re contemplating getting a large new server, where we will run a number of virtual servers. Are there any things we need to keep in mind in that case? Are there limitations on what a Xen system can manage? We''re talking about a 4 x Quad core CPU server with 64 GBs of RAM and a couple of terabytes of RAIDed SATA storage. -Morten (Re-sending this, as the first message

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4327 Summary: Sudden rsync errors Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: All URL: http://www.ercbroadband.org OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

Hello, Server rsyncd [root@data1 steve]# rsync --version rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29 [root@data1 steve]# uname -a Linux data1.contact-24-7.local 2.6.9-55.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Jun 26 14:30:58 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root@data1 steve]# Client rsync [root@srv01 cron.daily]# rsync --version rsync version 2.6.9 protocol version 29 [root@srv01 cron.daily]# uname -a

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1959 Summary: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes phase send_file_entry broken pipe Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

Hello, i386 Platform; FreeBSD v. 7.2 O/S I am experiencing repeated rsync failures, rsyncing from a remote site to which I have no access. >From the client side I can run truss to collect system calls truss -faedD -o truss.out -s 64 /usr/local/bin/rsync -avvv --contimeout=1200 --port=33444 ftp.wwwxxx.org::ftp . >> rsynclog & >From truss.out => 44755: 4492.350089813

Thank you! There is now two " XXX maybe make configurable " in the top of the file that is probably no longer relevant. Do you want a followup patch for that? Cheers, Morten Linderud On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 08:25:15AM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > Sorry, this now been committed and will be in openssh-10.0 > > On Sat, 23 Nov 2024, Morten Linderud wrote: > > > Hi,

Hi guys: First post for me on this list. THE PROBLEM =========== I have several linux servers (ranging from Redhat 7.3 to FC3) that use Rsync (version 2.6.8 and 2.6.7, read on for reasons) to backup their data. A typical rsync backup script looks like this: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ #!/bin/sh RSYNC_PASSWORD=<PASSWORD> rsync

Sorry, this now been committed and will be in openssh-10.0 On Sat, 23 Nov 2024, Morten Linderud wrote: > Hi, > > I sent this patch back inn april and I still have a need for this. Would it be > possible to get any pointers how we can have `hashalg` selectable by `ssh-keygen -Y`? > > -- > Morten Linderud > PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at

Hi. I''m upgrading a project from an 0.8.0 pre-release gem to 0.8.2. I''ve installed the 0.8.2 gem, and the rspec_on_rails 0.8.2 plugin: ruby script/plugin install svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/rspec/tags/REL_0_8_2/rspec When I try to run my specs though, I get the below error. It''s as if the spec_helper cannot find "spec/rails". I''ve noticed that

Hi, I sent this patch back inn april and I still have a need for this. Would it be possible to get any pointers how we can have `hashalg` selectable by `ssh-keygen -Y`? -- Morten Linderud PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16 On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 09:16:39PM +0200, Morten Linderud wrote: > `ssh-keygen -Y sign` only selects the signing algorithm `rsa-sha2-512` > and this prevents ssh-agent

There is no hash algorithm associated with SSH keys. The key format for RSA keys is always ?ssh-rsa?, and it is capable of being used with any of the available signature algorithms (ssh-rsa for SHA-1 and rsa-sha2-256 or rsa-sha2-512 for SHA-2). See section 3 in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8332: rsa-sha2-256 RECOMMENDED sign Raw RSA key rsa-sha2-512 OPTIONAL

Hi, I'm using rsync 2.6.8 to backup files and encountered the following problem: rsync -zvvxa --partial --no-whole-file --stats --progress ../new/access_log.processed . building file list ... 1 file to consider delta-transmission enabled access_log.processed rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 16385 bytes [sender]: Broken pipe (32) inflate (token) returned -5 rsync error: error in

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2783 tim.liim at alcatel-lucent.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tim.liim at alcatel-lucent.com ------- Comment #6 from tim.liim at alcatel-lucent.com 2010-10-27 00:27 CST ------- These

Hi Lang, > MCJIT does not compile lazily (though it sounds like that's not an issue here?) That is not an issue here since the code JIT's once (a few secs) and then run the generated machine code for hours. > Morten - Can you share any test cases that demonstrate the slowdown. I'd love to take a look at this. The code is massive so not practical. However I will try and