Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Regarding [Bug 1936] lseek failed in map_ptr"
2004 Oct 15
0
[Bug 1936] New: lseek failed in map_ptr
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
Summary: lseek failed in map_ptr
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.3
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: jitbose@yahoo.com
QAContact:
2005 Feb 27
1
[Bug 1936] lseek failed in map_ptr
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936
wayned@samba.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-02-27 14:14 -------
I've never been able to reproduce this bug. Are
2005 Aug 01
1
smb_lookup error=-13
I am experiencing an odd problem while attempting to mount and access a directory with smbfs. smbclient does not exhibit the same behavior.
I have created a directory /mnt/smb-test and am attempting to mount a volume from a NetApp Filer running OnTap 7 with NTFS security mode. An Active Directory DC handles security for the share. The Linux machine shows as registered in AD and I can use
2002 Feb 16
2
map_ptr error
We're using rsync to mirror a web server. The rsync is initiated using
ssh from a Red Hat Linux 7.2 box, the files are located on an Alpha
running a version of Digital Unix 4. On the Alpha rsync is 2.5.2, The
Linux box used to have a 2.4.6-X version, but with the map_ptr problems
I built 2.5.2 on that as well. However, version incompatibility was not
the problem, as they persist after the
2002 Feb 15
1
unexpected read size of 0 in map_ptr (Solaris 2.5.1)
Hi list,
Since upgrading rsync to version 2.5.2 on a Solaris 2.5.1 box,
I see plenty of
Warning: unexpected read size of 0 in map_ptr
when doing my nightly backup (rsyncing some directories
to an rsyncd on the same LAN). I have never seen this message
before, and I only see it on the Solaris machine (I upgraded
all my other machines to 2.5.2 as well).
I hope this is not a FAQ... I did not find
2002 Feb 20
8
map_ptr warning
I am trying to finalize the use of rsync for updatiung a new nfs server
before we take the old one offline. I keep getting the following
warning during the rsync process:
Warning: unexpected rad size of 0 in map_ptr
Any ideas where this comes from and how to make it go away? I am using
rsync 2.5.2 on Solaris 8 to pull data from rsync 2.5.2 on Solaris 7.
Bob
roconnor@vectorpartners.com
2002 Aug 05
5
[patch] read-devices
Greetings,
I'd like to propose a new option to rsync, which causes it to read
device files as if they were regular files. This includes pipes,
character devices and block devices (I'm not sure about sockets). The
main motivation is cases where you need to synchronize a large amount of
data that is not available as regular files, as in the following scenarios:
* Keep a copy of a block
2002 Feb 06
2
Error from rsync-2.5.2
Hi,
I have compiled the new version 2.5.2 rsync in our servers,
then ran rsync last night, there were some files not copied
to destination server, both source and destination servers are
running 2.5.2, I got the following error messages, can you
please let me know what would be caused the errors? I copied
back 2.3.2 version on both servers, and rsync went well.
Thanks for the help, here is
2005 Jul 15
1
Windows File Permissions
Greetings,
I just have a couple of questions. One is related to Samba specifically the second deals with Windows Networking, RSYNC, and Linux in general. I have asked it in the RSYNC mailing list, but so far no one has provided any insight.
I apologize if anyone has gone over this information. I have been unable to find much help in the mailing list archives, IRC, or the documentation.
2002 Feb 01
0
rsync Warning: unexpected read size of 0 in map_ptr
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:03:10PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dave Dykstra (dwd@bell-labs.com) said:
> > I stumbled across the bug report
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58878
> >
> > which shows that you made a bug fix to rsync on Sunday. What exactly did
> > you do?
>
> Attached. It's the same thing as yours, I just
2009 Jan 15
2
Problem syncing large dataset
Hi,
When using rsync-3.0.2 through 3.0.5, I get this error on a large
dataset syncing from machine-a to machine-b:
$ /bin/rsync -aHSz /local/. machine-b:/local/.
invalid len passed to map_ptr: -1737287498
rsync error: error in file IO (code 11) at fileio.c(188) [sender=3.0.5]
This happens no matter which side initiates the connection, so this
fails in the same way:
$ /bin/rsync -aHSz
2009 Apr 26
4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6293] New: rsync crashes when transferring files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6293
Summary: rsync crashes when transferring files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.5
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: dirk.samba@miriup.de
2005 Sep 20
2
Nulls instead of data
In short:
Platform: linux with 2.4 kernel
Version: rsync 2.6.6
Command line:
rsync266 -av -W --bwlimit=1 /mnt/somedir/rsync-2.6.6.tar.gz ./
Destination: local disk
Source: file on a smbfs mounted filesystem; share is exported on a NT 4.0
workstation over a very slow and unstable link
Result: Rsync completes operation with no special message, but the
resulting file is damaged, large
2011 May 29
22
[Bug 8177] New: Problems with big sparsed files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8177
Summary: Problems with big sparsed files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.8
Platform: x64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: joluinfante at gmail.com
2013 Mar 07
2
KVM Raw Format Image Causes lseek Error when Copying
When copying a raw KVM image to my usb drive I got a lseek error...why is this?
localhost temp # lr /kvm_guests/newInstall.img?
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10G Oct 22 05:36 /kvm_guests/newInstall.img
localhost temp #
localhost temp # cp /kvm_guests/newInstall.img . ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
cp: cannot lseek `./newInstall.img': Invalid argument
localhost temp # df -h
Filesystem ? ? ?Size ?Used Avail
2003 Jun 27
1
bug? -z option and large compressed data
Hi,
I think I found a bug in usage of zlib. rsync 2.5.6 with -z fails
like bellow.
% cp install-disk2.iso /var/tmp/install-disk2.iso
install-disk2.iso 100% |*****************************| 316 MB 00:56
% rsync -vIz install-disk2.iso 127.0.0.1:/var/tmp/install-disk2.iso
install-disk2.iso
deflate on token returned 0 (16384 bytes left)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol
2001 Jun 18
2
Client protocol error:(nil): lseek: Illegal seek
now that i have wineX compiling from cvs when i try to run wine i get:
Client protocol error:(nil): lseek: Illegal seek
even if i try wine --help here is the strace if its anyhelp
execve("/usr/bin/wine", ["wine"], [/* 25 vars */]) = 0
uname({sys="Linux", node="fnord-rides-again", ...}) = 0
brk(0) = 0x804c47c
mmap(0, 4096,
2020 May 24
3
[PATCH] file_checksum() optimization
When a whole-file checksum is performed, hashing was done in 64 byte
blocks, causing overhead and limiting performance.
Testing showed the performance improvement to go up quickly going from
64 to 512 bytes, with diminishing returns above, 4096 was where it
seemed to plateau for me. Re-used CHUNK_SIZE (32 kB) as it already
exists and should be fine to use here anyway.
Noticed this because
2013 May 17
2
[Bug 9894] New: Rsync can silently zero out chunks in a file
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9894
Summary: Rsync can silently zero out chunks in a file
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.9
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: an.m at outlook.com
2004 Aug 02
4
reducing memmoves
Attached is a patch that makes window strides constant when files are
walked with a constant block size. In these cases, it completely
avoids all memmoves.
In my simple local test of rsyncing 57MB of 10 local files, memmoved
bytes went from 18MB to zero.
I haven't tested this for a big variety of file cases. I think that this
will always reduce the memmoves involved with walking a large