Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches similar to: "using -v and -q together"
2006 Dec 10
1
Rsync 2.6.9 Develops Conflict Between --stats, I think --delete-after and Local Filesystem Replication
Hi all,
Well, yeah, that's it, really. :-) Try it. Works consistently, on Doze
and Linux here ...
# rsync -vvrlHSPtiypogD --stats --numeric-ids --delete-after --force --
partial-dir=.partial /tmp/ /var/tmp/
[...show stats...]
unknown message 4:1 [generator]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(307)
[generator=2.6.9]
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (26
2023 Jul 03
0
[PATCH] Add option --log-after to log after moving file into place
This mode is useful when a process is monitoring the log for
post-processing of transferred files.
With --log-after in local mode, both sender and receiver log to
the same log file, so it require --log-file with absolute path.
We add %o to the default log format, so it will be easy to tell
the logs of the sender from the logs of the receiver:
2023/02/14 14:40:25 [559755] building file list
2010 Feb 12
1
[RFC] add support for fallocate()
fallocate() is linux specific and will preallocate the space on disk for
the entire file. FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE does not change the filesize as
reported by stat(). An aborted transfer will have preallocated disk space
which is not "visible" via stat(). This shouldn't matter unless the user
does complet his transfer.
An alternative would be to use ftruncate() and shorten the file to the
2008 Aug 20
0
Problem with exact moment of issuing transfer log entry for a [recv] action
Some background: I have been assigned a task to implement one-way
synchronization of a large file storage to another box. The problem is
that on the target box a special directory has to be maintained in which
symlinks to received files should be created using special logic.
After some experimentation I have set up a named pipe which is used by
the receiving rsync daemon for transfer logging;
2016 Jan 21
1
[Bug 11683] New: hang on select when send many files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11683
Bug ID: 11683
Summary: hang on select when send many files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
Reporter: tom916 at
2010 Nov 23
0
[PATCH 2/3] Inform kernel of FADV_DONTNEED hint in sender
Use the FADV_DONTNEED fadvise hint after finishing reading an origin fd
in the sender.
---
sender.c | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sender.c b/sender.c
index 59dae7d..a934bfe 100644
--- a/sender.c
+++ b/sender.c
@@ -338,6 +338,12 @@ void send_files(int f_in, int f_out)
if (do_progress)
end_progress(st.st_size);
+ if
2010 Nov 23
0
[PATCH 3/3] Inform kernel of FADV_DONTNEED hint in receiver
Use the FADV_DONTNEED fadvise hint after finishing writing to a
destinataion fd in the receiver.
---
receiver.c | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/receiver.c b/receiver.c
index 39c5e49..33b21fb 100644
--- a/receiver.c
+++ b/receiver.c
@@ -721,6 +721,12 @@ int recv_files(int f_in, char *local_name)
recv_ok = receive_data(f_in, fnamecmp, fd1,
2007 Feb 07
3
Redirect --stats to STDERR.
Hello,
I have written a little script that's would email me all errors.
rsync -vah --delete --stats <sources> <destination> >
/var/log/sauvegarde/listoffile.log 2> /var/log/sauvegarde/errors.log
My problem is i want to have the stats in my mail. Is it possible to
redirect --stats to STDERR.
I have tryed to do this :
/---
2004 Apr 27
1
No error messages in rsyncd log in 2.6.1pre-1
(As I was composing this, the 2.6.1 release notice on the rsync
list rolled in. The quoted source, below, hasn't changed, so
I'll leave the 'pre-1' references unchanged...)
I have a situation where an error message seems to be sent from
the daemon to the client, but none is logged in the daemon's log.
Daemon is 2.6.1pre-1, with --timeout=3600, light CPU load.
Client is
2004 May 09
2
2.6.2 not displaying permissions errors on client side
Hello,
Noticed this (bug?) while testing out rsync. For a little background, I
need to push files real-time to some front-end servers, and I am
thinking of switching from some custom shell scripts that do this job
to rsync. I am thinking of running rsync as a daemon on the front-end
servers, and doing an upload from the back-end server to push the data
out as it comes in.
So, here is the deal:
2008 Feb 16
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5265] New: Daemon logging files not actually received with --only-write-batch
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5265
Summary: Daemon logging files not actually received with --only-
write-batch
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2016 Feb 19
3
Re: Sluggish performance with virtio and Win10
2016-02-18 15:15 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:59:52PM +0100, John Obaterspok wrote:
>
>> 2016-02-18 11:25 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:41:42AM +0100, John Obaterspok wrote:
>>>
>>> 2016-02-18 10:13 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander
2016 Feb 19
0
Re: Sluggish performance with virtio and Win10
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 07:16:12AM +0100, John Obaterspok wrote:
>2016-02-18 15:15 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:59:52PM +0100, John Obaterspok wrote:
>>
>>> 2016-02-18 11:25 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:41:42AM +0100, John
2016 Feb 18
2
Re: Sluggish performance with virtio and Win10
2016-02-18 11:25 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:41:42AM +0100, John Obaterspok wrote:
>
>> 2016-02-18 10:13 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 08:49:38AM +0100, John Obaterspok wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I'm using
2016 Feb 18
0
Re: Sluggish performance with virtio and Win10
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:59:52PM +0100, John Obaterspok wrote:
>2016-02-18 11:25 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 10:41:42AM +0100, John Obaterspok wrote:
>>
>>> 2016-02-18 10:13 GMT+01:00 Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 08:49:38AM +0100, John
2012 Feb 18
4
FADV_DONTNEED support
While going through an old todo list I found that these patches had fallen by
the way-side. About a year ago I initiated a discussion[1] with the Linux
kernel folks regarding the lack of any useable fadvise support on the kernel
side. As a result, I was observing extremely poor performance on my server
after backup as executable pages were being swapped out in favor of data
waiting to be flushed
2017 Oct 29
4
[Bug 13109] New: rsync hangs during transfer of many small files
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13109
Bug ID: 13109
Summary: rsync hangs during transfer of many small files
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.2
Hardware: x86
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
Assignee: wayned at samba.org
2008 May 08
1
Patch to not modify files in place unless "--inplace" option specified
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
diff -urN rsync-3.0.2-orig/generator.c rsync-3.0.2/generator.c
--- rsync-3.0.2-orig/generator.c 2008-03-28 10:30:11.000000000 -0700
+++ rsync-3.0.2/generator.c 2008-05-07 15:35:08.317364774 -0700
@@ -1508,6 +1508,7 @@
if (preserve_links && S_ISLNK(file->mode)) {
#ifdef SUPPORT_LINKS
+ int iflags =
2007 Aug 01
0
[PATCH] prevent negative "time left" values with --progress when file grows
[ see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=415648 ]
When a source file grows during transfer, rsync may show negative time
values such as 0:-1:-34. The following patch replaces then negative
times with ??:??:?? in such cases (as IMHO it's not worth the bother of
getting the filesize again etc. in such cases, but showing garbage info
is wrong as well).
Paul Slootman
Index:
2005 Jul 26
1
itemize() needs to use CHMOD_BITS (patch)
When syncing from Linux to Aix --itemize-changes with --perms lists
directories every time because the high-order st_mode bits for
directories differ between the two systems, and itemize() isn't masking
them with CHMOD_BITS. Here is a fix, tested with 2.6.6pre1.
PS: I'm not subscribed to this mailing list, please Cc: if you need
more info from me. Thanks.
--- generator.c.~1~ Thu Jun