similar to: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2499] rsync fails to exit when run from an environment with a signal mask

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2499] rsync fails to exit when run from an environment with a signal mask"

2017 Jun 11
3
post ino64: lockd no runs?
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 08:57:44AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: > It seems that {rpc.}lockd no longer runs after the ino64 changes on any > of my systems after a full rebuild of src and ports. No log entries > offer any insight as to why :-( > > imb I don't tend to use NFS on my systems that are running head, so I haven't had occasion to test this as stated. However, I
2005 Sep 21
1
[Bug 2499] rsync fails to exit when run from an environment with a signal mask
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2499 ------- Additional Comments From agaffney@gentoo.org 2005-09-21 09:01 ------- I see rsync 2.6.6 is out. Any chance this made it in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
2005 Mar 20
0
[Bug 2499] New: rsync fails to exit when run from an environment with a signal mask
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2499 Summary: rsync fails to exit when run from an environment with a signal mask Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2001 Nov 22
2
Add new user -> swat core dump
Hi there, I have a problem when I try to create a new user with swat. I use binaries of Samba 2.2.2 coming from www.samba.org, or from www.sunfreeware.com on Solaris 2.6 and on 8. I compiled the sources and the result is the same. When I click on "Add New User" (Server Password Management), I receive a nearly blank page: I can only see the samba gif on top and the user is not
2020 Aug 28
0
[klibc:ia64-signal-fix] ia64: sigaction: Make signal updates atomic
Commit-ID: 623b03fb63f0c0473b378cf61c77258fd450b5a1 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=623b03fb63f0c0473b378cf61c77258fd450b5a1 Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> AuthorDate: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:59:28 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 20:22:50 +0100 [klibc] ia64: sigaction: Make
2020 Aug 29
0
[klibc:master] ia64: sigaction: Make signal updates atomic
Commit-ID: 69fb0c9b936dd59a7f7c9fab40f9206b80837b5b Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=69fb0c9b936dd59a7f7c9fab40f9206b80837b5b Author: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> AuthorDate: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 19:59:28 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:23:08 +0100 [klibc] ia64: sigaction: Make
2005 Sep 08
1
Solaris NSS/winbind problem - large groups
Hello All, It seems that 'getent group groupname' hangs on large groups for Solaris 8/9 running winbind. Currently running Samba 3.0.20 but also tried 3.0.10. 'ls -l' also hangs if listing a file created by a user who's primary group is too large(such as Domain Users). Users can still access the files but netbackups hang. The problem I am experiencing is found in the
2016 Mar 08
1
[PATCH] fish: reset the console on ^Z RHBZ#1213844
Patch registers SIGTSTP hook where it sends reset terminal color control sequence using write and fsync. Handler is installed only if signal is not being ignored. Patch uses rl_free_line_state and rl_cleanup_after_signal to unhook readline from terminal, then it calls original TSTP handler using approach in URL below and again hooks readline using rl_reset_after_signal. Handling is based on code
2016 Feb 16
2
[PATCH] fish: reset the console on ^Z RHBZ#1213844
Patch registers SIGTSTP hook where it sends reset terminal color control sequence. Maros Zatko (1): fish: reset the console on ^Z RHBZ#1213844 fish/fish.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) -- 2.5.0
2004 Feb 08
3
Re: klibc - setenv broken
Kay Sievers wrote: > Hi, > this simple program compiled with klibc: > > #include <stdio.h> > int main(int argc, char* argv[]) > { > setenv("TESTENV", "happy", 1); > printf("TESTENV='%s'\n", getenv("TESTENV")); > } > > prints: > > ./env > TESTENV='(null)' > >
2004 Dec 03
2
NFS mounted directory
Hi, Has anyone any ideas what is causing my smbd processes to crash? The files being accessed via samba are on an NFS mounted directory. In the samba log file I am getting the following errors: [2004/12/03 16:31:33, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1026) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 2181 9 on port 53336 for dev = 2c00002, inode = 297939333
2005 Dec 23
4
sshd blocks SIGALRM
Gidday everbody, We have just found an interesting issue regarding the sshd daemon on our SuSE system. For some reasons, the /usr/sbin/sshd process blocks SIGALRM as shown in the /proc/pid/status: $ cat /proc/`cat /var/run/sshd.init.pid`/status Name: sshd State: S (sleeping) SleepAVG: 0% [...] SigPnd: 0000000000000000 ShdPnd: 0000000000000000 SigBlk: 0000000000002000 <-- SIGALRM is
2005 Mar 02
1
[PATCH] signal.h
This patch does two things. This test program results (on i386) in an error about _NSIG: #include <signal.h> #if defined (SIGRTMAX) int rtmax = SIGRTMAX; #endif The cause is that the kernel signal.h defines SIGRTMAX as _NSIG, then makes _NSIG invisibelby hiding it inside ifdef __KERNEL__. Perhaps it's more elegant to solve this in the kernel, but the ramifications of that scare
2004 Dec 28
1
OpenSSH 3.9p1 X11 forwarding
Hi, We upgraded from 3.7.1p2 to 3.9p1. The behaviour of the X11 forwarding changed significantly, it is much slower. See below the truss output (server side which runs 3.7.1p2) an check for the timestamp (6 seconds delay). Do you have any idea what may causes this behaviour? Platform is Solaris 5.9 Generic_117171-05. Thanks in advance, Andy Kocher 19279: 9.5463 sigaction(SIGCLD,
2015 Feb 14
2
freenas USB connection error
Hi all, I'm a new user trying to get a Proline UPS I1000 UPS to work with freenas 9.3 over USB. When running upsdrvctl I get a permission denied error. Required debug info: OS name and version, # uname -a FreeBSD freenas.local 9.3-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 #2 r275790+f84e770: Tue Dec 23 23:35:33 PST 2014 root at
2011 Aug 16
2
[PATCH] test: Add signal nodefer
From: Matt Fleming <matt at console-pimps.org> Uncovered a bug in avr32 signal handling, might come handy in testing other archs signal. Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt at console-pimps.org> Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> --- Seen on lmkl, any objections to add your test to klibc: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=summary We know archs were
2003 Oct 24
0
pam_smbpass can't find password database
Hello Sorry for disturbing again. It looks like I must pass lot of compilation issues to force pam_smbpass working. And I don't believe, that nobody faced same problems as I do, because I am using quite trivial configuration without success, so maybes somebody can share experience with pam_smbpass under Solaris or help me identify what's wrong with it ? So finally I wrote my own pam
2003 May 09
5
Hacked?
This morning, I noticed in my security email, that my entire /usr/bin directory had setuid diff's set on them. I think I've been hacked. So I installed chkrootkit from ports and ran it. It showed not infected for everything, except NETSTAT. NETSTAT showed infected... I ran chkrootkit for another machine (at my office), and it showed not infected for everything. Both machines are
1998 Nov 14
0
Sync passwd and smbpasswd
I am having problems setting up the smbpasswd command to sync the /etc/passwd and $SAMBAHOME/private/smbasswd files. My passwd program (/usr/bin/passwd %u) doesn't seem to want to wait around for smbpasswd to send it a second password for confirmation. I am running Solaris 2.5.1 (103640-23) on an Ultra 2300 and using Samba 1.9.18p10 compiled with gcc 2.8.1. I thought that I had this running
2005 Jan 19
1
sshd hangs
using openssh-3.8.1p1 from sunfreeware.com on a SunOS XXX 5.8 Generic_117000-03 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240. sshd seems to ignore or miss SIGCLD. this is a rare behaviour we observe about once per week in a ssh intensive environment. the process hangs here: truss: 24453: poll(0xFFBEEF28, 2, -1) (sleeping...) gcore, mdb: libc.so.1`_poll+4(b, 0, 0, ffbeef38, 6fc40,