similar to: Reading for area during rsync

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "Reading for area during rsync"

2008 Mar 30
2
Rsync on windows
Hi, It there a way to use rsync from windows server, so it will pull data on NFS through UNIX rsync server? Thanks, Oren Mark Intel - Israel Engineering Computing ISEC Data & Application Hosting oren.mark@intel.com (+) 972-4-865-5987 iNET: 465-5987 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain
2006 Jul 03
2
Time entries in rsync log
Hi, I get strange time entries in the rsync log, For example: 2006/07/02 14:56:12 [20054] rsync to upload/aspen/nhm from plxc6266.pdx.intel.com (10.25.26.90) 2006/07/02 11:56:22 [20054] wrote 28 bytes read 3582404 bytes total size 32030720 The first entry in the correct time and second is strange. I checked and this is not the time on the destination. Any ideas what is the
2006 Jul 16
1
Connection refuse to rsync
Hi, We use rsync to share data between two remote sites. We are using rsync after configuration of the rsync.conf file. I created a module in the file with the relevant entries and permissions. The problem is that I get "connection refused ", when I try to run rsync in the following way: root@rsync1-mpg:/root# rsync ptsinf01.pt.intel.com:: rsync: failed to connect to
2005 Sep 19
1
rsync and HP11.11 problem
Hi All, I am trying to run rsync from HP11.00 machine (source) to HP11.11 machine, as test for migration plan. The data on the source is not changing since it is snapshot of active data. Every time we try to run the following command: timex rsync -avuz --delete isynh09:/snap We get the following error: receiving file list ... done mknod
2006 May 16
1
Rsync linked disk
Hi, I have a problem rsync disk that is linked in the following way: /a/b/c/d/e -> ../e We use that in order to create linked tree which has link to kind of tools we need to rsync and thus not worry on disk capacity cause we can add linked disks as many as we can. We use rsync module with chroot for security reasons as follows: [d] Path = /a/b/c/d Chroot = true The
2008 Mar 13
1
Group name vs. GID
Hi, I use rsync the replicate data between several sites. As far as I know the default rsync operation is to copy group name and not GID. I have two sites, lets say A and B with the same GIDs, and one, C, with different GID. When I replicated data from site A to C it is working fine - it copied group names and the GID is mapped to the one in site C. When I rsync the data from site B to C, it is
2006 Jan 31
1
rsync using ssh get stuck
Hi, We started working with rsync to sync data between remote sites. We started seeing many stuck rsync processes. Usually it happens in the ssh stage while the ssh issues a "select" syscall on fd #4 while it is long gone. Here is an example: root@ptsl2171:/root# ps -efwww |grep ekrimer ekrimer 28619 4979 0 Jan28 ? 00:00:00
2006 Jan 15
2
rsync of file list
Hi All, I would to rsync data spread of many files from remote site. Each file may exist in total different location - the path for each file may be different. My question is: Can I do it one single rsync command, giving a file containing list of paths as parameter, or do I need to run rsync for each file. I did not find any option doing it in the man page. I tried to play with
2007 Feb 13
1
keep group and owner on part of the files
Hi, I use rsync daemon to replicate disks between sites. I am replicating the disks using rsync -avzx command. The thing is that I have in one site the same UNIX group but with different GID. So someone with the same UID can access the group on the source but not on the destination. Is there a way, beside aligning GID number, on both sites to after changing the group on the destination
2009 Aug 16
1
Rsync completed successfully, but files are not identical
Hi All, I came into a strange issue running rsync on directory with ~500,000 files. Some of the file, although with same time stamps and size on source and destination, were different on the destination. The destination is just a mirrored area, and the data written to it, is just the one that comes through rsync. Needless to mentioned, that when I remove files and synced them again it works, or
2017 Jan 12
2
RFC: Dynamically Allocated "Callee Saved Registers" Lists
Here in an example that explains the difference. // Only declaration – No implementation // Assume that the value is returned in EAX and the arguments are passed in EAX, ECX, EDX, ESI, EDI. int __regcall callee (int a, int b, int c, int d, int e); // implemented in a different module void caller() { … x = callee(1,2,3,4,5); … } What will be RegMask using IPRA register usage collector? Callee
2017 Jan 12
2
RFC: Dynamically Allocated "Callee Saved Registers" Lists
Hi Mehdi, I think that the subject of the RFC is misleading. The true problem that we are trying to solve is to remove returned/passed arguments from the regmask (According to the calling convention). IPRA and CC updated RegMask can’t use the same mechanism because they contradict each other. I think that the following analog will help to explain why I think that a reuse is redundant: Let’s
2017 Jan 12
2
RFC: Dynamically Allocated "Callee Saved Registers" Lists
Hi Mehdi, It is true that both IPRA and the proposed mechanism save RegMasks. So you might say that the data structure in the immutable pass should be reused, but this is the only similarity. Even this similarity is not exactly true. I save register masks that doesn’t use passed/returned arguments while IPRA saves register masks for modified registers. So how can they share the same mechanism?
2017 Jan 11
2
RFC: Dynamically Allocated "Callee Saved Registers" Lists
Hi Mehdi, I wasn’t familiar with IPRA before, thank you for bringing it up. After studying it, I have to say that IPRA is a wonderful idea and is well implemented. I tried to reuse the mechanism for the last couple of days. I implemented a solution using IPRA mechanism and encountered few issues: 1. IPRA uses immutable analysis pass called “PhysicalRegisterUsageInfo”. The usage of such
2017 Nov 06
2
Target Specific LTO Machine Pass
Hi, I want to add Target Specific MachineFunctionPass so that it will run during Link Time Optimization. The pass is currently running in non-LTO compilation (added in addPreEmitPass). What do I need to do in order to run my pass also during LTO? Thanks, Oren --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may
2016 Sep 22
2
RFC: Adding Register Calling Convention Support
Hi All, The Register Calling Convention (RegCall) was introduced by Intel to optimize parameter transfer on function call. This calling convention ensures that as many values as possible are passed or returned in registers. To use RegCall, place the keyword before a function declaration. For example: __regcall int foo (int i, int j); // Windows OS __attribute__((regcall)) foo (int I, int j); //
2016 Oct 31
3
rsync show files changed during transfer - how?
i'm using rsync for backup and, as rsync can detect if files have vanished during transfer, i wonder how rsync can tell which files got modified during transfer (i.e. which are not consistent on the destination side after transfer) apparently, rsync can't show that information? wouldn't that be an extremely useful feature if rsync could do another additional mtime or even checksum
2016 Nov 30
2
RFC: Adding Support For Vectorcall Calling Convention
Adding Support For Vectorcall Calling Convention ===================================================== Vectorcall Calling Convention for x64 ---------------------------------------------------- The __vectorcall calling convention specifies that arguments to functions are to be passed in registers, when possible. __vectorcall uses more registers for arguments than __fastcall or the default x64
2008 May 21
4
Vanishing maildirsize files with 1.0.7 using 'deliver' via postfix
Aloha, I've searched the list and have found no similar reports, so I'm asking here. We have 3 RH5.1 boxes running the stock Postfix 2.3.3, but due to issues with the stock Dovecot 1.0rc15, Redhat supplied us with the version of Dovecot 1.0.7 that will be in Redhat 5.2. The mail store is automounted per-user from a Sun box via NFS. We were using it with no problems until last Friday,
2020 Nov 04
1
API support for placing a message for a specific user
> On 03/11/2020 02:24 Oren Yehezkely <orenyny at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I am trying to find out if Dovecot API allows placing?a message directly in a customer's mailbox, without needing to send the email via SMTP. > > Thanks for?your help, > > Oren `doveadm save` is available from HTTP API, but seems to be missing from documentation.