similar to: rsnyc over ssh through scripting and cron...

Hi all, today we had a performance issue transfering a big amount of data where one file was over 50GB. Rsync was tunneled over SSH and we expected the data to be synced within hours. However after over 10 hours the data is still not synced ... The sending box has rsync running with 60-80 % CPU load (2GHz Pentium 4) while the receiver is nearly idle. So far I had no acces to the poblematic

Hi, On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:51 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > Hello fellow LLVMers and Clangstas, > > We want to make Clang great, and we need your help! > > Helping is easy: just build Clang on your platform and start using it as your main compiler for LLVM and Clang development. Much of the Clang team has been living on Clang for at least several weeks already, and we've

I have a simple backup shell script that I am using for backups. I have a problem which I think is a result of this error: rsync warning: some files vanished before they could be transferred (code 24) at main.c(789) Any command after the rsync never gets executed if I get the above error. The file system is very large and we have engineers working at all hours so it is rare that this would

I can't switch to clang on my project until it can handle boost headers. On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Rene Rebe <rene at exactcode.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Apr 14, 2010, at 10:51 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > >> Hello fellow LLVMers and Clangstas, >> >> We want to make Clang great, and we need your help! >> >> Helping is easy: just build Clang

Hello fellow LLVMers and Clangstas, We want to make Clang great, and we need your help! Helping is easy: just build Clang on your platform and start using it as your main compiler for LLVM and Clang development. Much of the Clang team has been living on Clang for at least several weeks already, and we've found it to be quite stable for development. If you run into problems---poor

Hi All, I've finished the first draft of the 2.8 release notes: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Please feel free to commit improvements and enhancements. There are "a lot" of changes that went into 2.8, but I think I've scraped most of them out of the commits. However, it is also highly likely that I missed something, so if I missed your favorite feature, please speak

Hi all, I just wanted to temporarily make some new CMS I set up available to the public for testing on port 8080 of our web server forwarded via ssh to to my local, firewalled workstation: ssh me at some-host.tld -R 8080:localhost:80 However I had to notice that this only binds to the loopback interface and not to all. For -L there is the -g option to low connects to locally forwarded ports

No, this is not the case. Just because you compile something to LLVM IR does not make the thing you compiled work on every architecture. You may even be able to retarget it to any architecture (it depends), but this in no way means the result will *actually work*. The LLVM IR generated by llvm-gcc is very architecture dependent. Theoretically you could make a C compiler that was mostly C

On Oct 21, 2008, at 2:27 AM, Jay Foad wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to use LLVM to compile and optimise code when I don't know > whether the target CPU is big- or little-endian. This would allow me > to create a single optimised LLVM bitcode binary of an application, > and then run it through a JIT compiler on systems of differening > endianness. Ok. > I realise that

I have two Windows 2003 Standard Edition Server with 2x 3,0 GHz P4 and 4 GB RAM. On each server rsync runs as cygwin daemon (rsync version 2.6.6; protocol version 29). The two servers are connected through a 2 MBit VPN link. When I sync a single large file or a whole directory, rsync only uses 50% of the available bandwidth. When I do the same between windows and linux server, rsync takes the

does that mean .o generated with gcc (.c -> .s and .s -> .o) will not contain llvm ir? i meant, final kernel bitcode ir arch independent and can be JIT with any arch-specific backend. Is it not the case? thanks, ashish On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Andrew Lenharth <andrewl at lenharth.org> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Ashish Bijlani > <ashish.bijlani at

Hi, I'd like to use LLVM to compile and optimise code when I don't know whether the target CPU is big- or little-endian. This would allow me to create a single optimised LLVM bitcode binary of an application, and then run it through a JIT compiler on systems of differening endianness. I realise that in general the LLVM IR depends on various characteristics of the target; I'd just

Hi Chris, just spotted that the libc++ link in the 2.8 release notes is invalid, points to http://libc++.llvm.org/, should be ...libcxx... René On Oct 4, 2010, at 6:43 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Hi All, > > I've finished the first draft of the 2.8 release notes: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > > Please feel free to commit improvements and enhancements.

I have setup rsync to run as a deamon exporting one module named home. when I attempt to use the rsync syntax specified on http://samba.anu.edu.au/ftp/rsync/rsync.html as follows: rsync -av -e "ssh -l ssh-user" rsync-user@host::module /dest I get a message from ssh, "bad escape character 'ssh -l username'". This is an ssh error message, but I am not putting any

hi everybody I have to do a lot of Anova with R and I would like to have another type of coefficients coding.. I explain. by default if I have 2 temperatures for an experience. 100°C or 130°C and I want to see the temperature effect on the presure I want to estimate the coefficient of each temperature. I will obtain ,with the anova, juste one coefficients for example +3,56 (for 100°C), and the

Hi all, I'm currently reviewing if LLVM would be useful for a use case on our side, and run into a build problem on PPC64/Linux (x86, x86_64, and ppc build ok): the 2.5 release and trunk fail the same way, just the line number is differs by one, 2.5: llvm[2]: ======= Finished Linking Release Executable tblgen (without symbols) make[2]: Leaving directory

Hi All, first time post so please excuse any blunders We are specifying two servers using supermicro X7DBE+ MB and want to add on a SAS controller for Raid 10. We want to use the CentOS 4.4 X86_64 distro. We are currently considering an Intel CC SRCSAS144E SAS Raid Controller for the servers using 4 Fujitsu 147 GB SAS HDD, and a Adaptec SASC RAID 4805 8-port for the server using 6 Fujitsu

I recently installed CentOS 5.1 on a DL71 ASI notebook. After my yum update the timeout parameter in /boot/grub/grub.conf file has no effect. It sits at the grub screen forever unless I press the enter key to select a kernel, at which point it will boot. Any help or suggestions to fix this would be much appreciated CentOS release 5.2 (Final) Kernel 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5 on an i686 # grub.conf

On my CentOS v5.2 server (dual Pentium4) the OpenSSH daemon stands out as being the most CPU-intensive of the applications running, It's used 176 minutes of CPU time in the last 2 days alone. Is there any way to lower the CPU utilization without compromising security? (I.e. without using a less processor-intensive encrypt/decrypt algorithm?) I'm getting the CPU use figures from top,

tftp keeps timing out when I try to transfer files. I intend to use tftp with G4U to clone a standard workstation. I am testing it between two Dell poweredge servers running CentOS 4.3. "chkconfig --list |grep tftp" shows tftp up and running on both boxes. When connected "tftp>status" shows it is talking to the other box "tptp>trace" shows "sent WRQ