similar to: [Bug 3186] Surprisingly large unshared memory usage

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 Summary: Surprisingly large unshared memory usage Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1518 is|0 |1 obsolete| | Attachment #1519 is|0 |1 obsolete|

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 ------- Additional Comments From foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu 2005-10-17 04:36 ------- Created an attachment (id=1518) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1518&action=view) Transcript of unsuccessful attempts I have other transcripts with me experimenting with all four possibilities of trailing or no trailing slash

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3168 ------- Additional Comments From foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu 2005-10-14 04:50 ------- Obtw, when this gets reinstated, it would be -really nice- if one or the other (but NOT BOTH) of --max-size or --min-size was an "OR EQUAL". Right now, if I'm trying to copy all files under one size to one place, and all files over one

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290 Summary: Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion `f_out >= 0' failed Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277 Summary: [Feature req] "I couldn't do something you asked" warning Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

> first <- data.frame(a=1:3, b=4:6) > second <- data.frame(b=7:9, c=10:12) > third <- merge(first, second, by="b", all=TRUE) > third b a c 1 4 1 NA 2 5 2 NA 3 6 3 NA 4 7 NA 10 5 8 NA 11 6 9 NA 12 It's easy to replace the Nas with whatever value you want. No, merge() does not work with more than two data sets at a time. Andy From: mtb954 at gmail.com

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 Summary: rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole- file Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hi all, I have installed rsync 2.5.5 as daemons on our 35 Netware servers (no 2.5.6 is yet available for Netware) and do a daily sync from a Linux Rsync client machine with 1.2 TB disk capacity. For the moment we do a daily, weekly and monthly backup on tape of this machine, but I'd like to replace the daily backups by a disc-based setup. It would be good to be able to share the

(I'm not sending this to dirvish@pegasus because I think that this message applies more to rsync's --link-dest option than to just dirvish.) I recently noticed a huge spike in dirvish network usage and traced it to files whose permissions had been changed. (with rsync v2.5.6) I understand and agree that a --link-dest copy of a source file cannot be hardlinked to, but couldn't a

I was saddened to learn today that JW Schultz was found dead back on March 27th of this year. JW was a big help in the recent development of rsync and I sorely missed his presence during the last release cycle. JW was also the author of the Dirvish backup software, and Keith Lofstrom (who provided me with the sad news) has plans to put some memorial information onto the new dirvish site as

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 Summary: devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

I've got a problem for which the combination of -R and --link-dest doesn't seem to be quite enough---and I may have discovered a few small bugs as well; test cases are below. [And if someone has a scheme for doing this that doesn't involve rsync at all, but works okay, I'm all ears as well---I'm not the first with this problem.] Here's my problem: I unfortunately need to

We are running backup softwares for incrementals/differentials and full backups with variouse softwares currently using dirvish scripts + amanda .. what is everyones views on other opensourced backup software? is there anything better or other options we have missed? We are looking at backula as an option? any thoughts? Thanks - Nathan - http://www.linuxcare.ca

I?m trying to rsync a 210 GB Filesystem with approx 1.500.000 Files. Rsync always dies after about 29 GB without any error messages. I?m Using rsync version 2.5.5 protocol version 26. Has anyone an idea ? Thank?s Clemens

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1890 devzero at web.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |devzero at web.de ------- Comment #3 from devzero at web.de 2009-08-07 05:11 CST ------- wouldn`t it be better to give up on that effort

Hi all, I see a couple of earlier threads, particularly this one: https://www.mail-archive.com/rsync at lists.samba.org/msg32328.html partly answer my question, but not fully. I also am writing a wrapper, so that I can run multiple dirvish runs against the same server, using forced commands, but without using multiple keys to get multiple commands, which is my current workaround. But in the

On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:32:39 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On s390, protected virtualization guests have to use bounced I/O > buffers. That requires some plumbing. > > Let us make sure, any device that uses DMA API with direct ops > correctly is spared from the problems, that a hypervisor attempting > I/O to a non-shared page would bring. > >

On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:32:39 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On s390, protected virtualization guests have to use bounced I/O > buffers. That requires some plumbing. > > Let us make sure, any device that uses DMA API with direct ops > correctly is spared from the problems, that a hypervisor attempting > I/O to a non-shared page would bring. > >

Hello. I am trying to make use of rsync for backup purposes. I want to use it with the -b switch: it renames older FILE to FILE~ instead of replacing it with the newer version. This way, only the newest and the second most recent versions of a file are saved. I want to have more versions. One approach to this can be inpired by --backup-dir operation. I'd rather extend the backup