Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[Bug 3175] devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together"
2005 Oct 17
0
[Bug 3175] New: devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175
Summary: devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.7
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy:
2005 Oct 17
2
[Bug 3175] it would be nice if --link-dest matched up devices and symlinks too
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175
wayned@samba.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #1518 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
Attachment #1519 is|0 |1
obsolete|
2005 Nov 22
7
[Bug 3186] Surprisingly large unshared memory usage
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186
------- Comment #1 from foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu 2005-11-22 14:16 MST -------
Any ideas on this? It's been open 5 weeks and probably got overlooked... Tnx!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are
2003 Mar 15
1
Dirvish, --link-dest and permissions
(I'm not sending this to dirvish@pegasus because I think that this message
applies more to rsync's --link-dest option than to just dirvish.)
I recently noticed a huge spike in dirvish network usage and traced it to
files whose permissions had been changed. (with rsync v2.5.6)
I understand and agree that a --link-dest copy of a source file cannot be
hardlinked to, but couldn't a
2006 Sep 04
7
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] New: rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079
Summary: rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-
file
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.8
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2005 Oct 14
3
[Bug 3168] --min-size cores in 2.6.5 and is completely missing in 2.6.6
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3168
------- Additional Comments From foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu 2005-10-14 04:50 -------
Obtw, when this gets reinstated, it would be -really nice- if one or the other
(but NOT BOTH) of --max-size or --min-size was an "OR EQUAL". Right now, if I'm
trying to copy all files under one size to one place, and all files over one
2005 Oct 18
0
[Bug 3186] New: Surprisingly large unshared memory usage
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186
Summary: Surprisingly large unshared memory usage
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.7
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy:
2009 Jan 12
1
Is -R --link-dest really hard to use, or is it me?
I've got a problem for which the combination of -R and --link-dest
doesn't seem to be quite enough---and I may have discovered a few
small bugs as well; test cases are below.
[And if someone has a scheme for doing this that doesn't involve rsync
at all, but works okay, I'm all ears as well---I'm not the first with
this problem.]
Here's my problem: I unfortunately need to
2007 Jan 23
1
--link-dest copying modified files
Hi!
It's me again with another --link-dest issue:
I am using dirvish (www.dirvish.org) to create daily backup on disk
images.
dirvish is using rsync with --link-dest pointing to the last good image.
This creates images with hardlinks to unmodified files. So far so good.
Now I want to create a "current" filetree with hardlinks pointing to the
last image.
rsync -vaH --delete
2013 Nov 24
11
[Bug 10290] New: Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion `f_out >= 0' failed
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290
Summary: Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion
`f_out >= 0' failed
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: x64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: regression
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo:
2003 Dec 20
1
why not link devices with --link-dest option?
I notice that devices are not hardlinked when using the --link-dest
option, for instance:
rsync -aH --link-dest=../bar/ foo/ baz/
When foo/zero is a device, baz/zero is not a hardlink to bar/zero. How
come?
$ rsync --version
rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26
on linux 2.4.x
--
Russell Senior ``I have nine fingers; you have ten.''
seniorr@aracnet.com
2011 May 11
7
[Bug 8130] New: ACL and link-dest do not work together
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8130
Summary: ACL and link-dest do not work together
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.8
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
ReportedBy: az9901 at gmail.com
2005 Nov 22
9
[Bug 3277] New: [Feature req] "I couldn't do something you asked" warning
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277
Summary: [Feature req] "I couldn't do something you asked"
warning
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.7
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2009 Feb 11
2
--link-dest=server::location/folder
I'm wondering if I can use link-dest to compare rsync to a remote
directory.
rsync -aCHh --stats --link-dest=akane::backup/ranma.daily.1 /
myserver::akane/ranma.daily.0
Something like that? Is it going to work like it does when doing a
local rsync with a local link-dest directory? Is it going to chew
massive amounts of bandwidth? Is there something else I should be
doing
2012 Mar 22
1
Help debugging an issue with --fuzzy --fuzzy and --link-dest
I've identified a situation where the combination of --fuzzy --fuzzy
(yes: two of them) and --link-dest is not behaving as I'd expect. I'm
first wondering if my expectation is wrong. Assuming that it is not,
then I'm wondering how best to figure out the problem.
The double use of --fuzzy is based upon https://bugzilla.samba.org/
show_bug.cgi?id=4056 which should be present on
2004 Jul 27
1
Sad news about JW Schultz
I was saddened to learn today that JW Schultz was found dead back on
March 27th of this year. JW was a big help in the recent development of
rsync and I sorely missed his presence during the last release cycle.
JW was also the author of the Dirvish backup software, and Keith
Lofstrom (who provided me with the sad news) has plans to put some
memorial information onto the new dirvish site as
2003 Jun 20
1
good snapshot solution
Hi all,
I have installed rsync 2.5.5 as daemons on our 35 Netware servers (no 2.5.6
is yet available for Netware) and do a daily sync from a Linux Rsync client
machine with 1.2 TB disk capacity. For the moment we do a daily, weekly and
monthly backup on tape of this machine, but I'd like to replace the daily
backups by a disc-based setup. It would be good to be able to share the
2008 Jun 08
5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5526] New: problems with rsync -X --link-dest
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5526
Summary: problems with rsync -X --link-dest
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: idra@samba.org
QAContact:
2007 Jul 19
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4803] New: link-dest folder is not validated
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4803
Summary: link-dest folder is not validated
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Mac OS X
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: smokin.jake@mac.com
2008 Aug 04
4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5665] New: need option to hard link from source tree to dest tree
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5665
Summary: need option to hard link from source tree to dest tree
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.4
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: Dave@Yost.com