similar to: [Bug 3175] devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[Bug 3175] devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together"

2005 Oct 17
0
[Bug 3175] New: devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 Summary: devices and --link-dest don't seem to work together Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:
2005 Oct 17
2
[Bug 3175] it would be nice if --link-dest matched up devices and symlinks too
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3175 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #1518 is|0 |1 obsolete| | Attachment #1519 is|0 |1 obsolete|
2005 Nov 22
7
[Bug 3186] Surprisingly large unshared memory usage
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 ------- Comment #1 from foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu 2005-11-22 14:16 MST ------- Any ideas on this? It's been open 5 weeks and probably got overlooked... Tnx! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are
2003 Mar 15
1
Dirvish, --link-dest and permissions
(I'm not sending this to dirvish@pegasus because I think that this message applies more to rsync's --link-dest option than to just dirvish.) I recently noticed a huge spike in dirvish network usage and traced it to files whose permissions had been changed. (with rsync v2.5.6) I understand and agree that a --link-dest copy of a source file cannot be hardlinked to, but couldn't a
2006 Sep 04
7
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4079] New: rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole-file
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4079 Summary: rsync fails with --inplace, --link-dest and --no-whole- file Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2005 Oct 14
3
[Bug 3168] --min-size cores in 2.6.5 and is completely missing in 2.6.6
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3168 ------- Additional Comments From foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu 2005-10-14 04:50 ------- Obtw, when this gets reinstated, it would be -really nice- if one or the other (but NOT BOTH) of --max-size or --min-size was an "OR EQUAL". Right now, if I'm trying to copy all files under one size to one place, and all files over one
2005 Oct 18
0
[Bug 3186] New: Surprisingly large unshared memory usage
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 Summary: Surprisingly large unshared memory usage Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:
2009 Jan 12
1
Is -R --link-dest really hard to use, or is it me?
I've got a problem for which the combination of -R and --link-dest doesn't seem to be quite enough---and I may have discovered a few small bugs as well; test cases are below. [And if someone has a scheme for doing this that doesn't involve rsync at all, but works okay, I'm all ears as well---I'm not the first with this problem.] Here's my problem: I unfortunately need to
2007 Jan 23
1
--link-dest copying modified files
Hi! It's me again with another --link-dest issue: I am using dirvish (www.dirvish.org) to create daily backup on disk images. dirvish is using rsync with --link-dest pointing to the last good image. This creates images with hardlinks to unmodified files. So far so good. Now I want to create a "current" filetree with hardlinks pointing to the last image. rsync -vaH --delete
2013 Nov 24
11
[Bug 10290] New: Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion `f_out >= 0' failed
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10290 Summary: Regression since 3.0.9: send_xattr_request: Assertion `f_out >= 0' failed Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: regression Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo:
2003 Dec 20
1
why not link devices with --link-dest option?
I notice that devices are not hardlinked when using the --link-dest option, for instance: rsync -aH --link-dest=../bar/ foo/ baz/ When foo/zero is a device, baz/zero is not a hardlink to bar/zero. How come? $ rsync --version rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26 on linux 2.4.x -- Russell Senior ``I have nine fingers; you have ten.'' seniorr@aracnet.com
2011 May 11
7
[Bug 8130] New: ACL and link-dest do not work together
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8130 Summary: ACL and link-dest do not work together Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: az9901 at gmail.com
2005 Nov 22
9
[Bug 3277] New: [Feature req] "I couldn't do something you asked" warning
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3277 Summary: [Feature req] "I couldn't do something you asked" warning Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2009 Feb 11
2
--link-dest=server::location/folder
I'm wondering if I can use link-dest to compare rsync to a remote directory. rsync -aCHh --stats --link-dest=akane::backup/ranma.daily.1 / myserver::akane/ranma.daily.0 Something like that? Is it going to work like it does when doing a local rsync with a local link-dest directory? Is it going to chew massive amounts of bandwidth? Is there something else I should be doing
2012 Mar 22
1
Help debugging an issue with --fuzzy --fuzzy and --link-dest
I've identified a situation where the combination of --fuzzy --fuzzy (yes: two of them) and --link-dest is not behaving as I'd expect. I'm first wondering if my expectation is wrong. Assuming that it is not, then I'm wondering how best to figure out the problem. The double use of --fuzzy is based upon https://bugzilla.samba.org/ show_bug.cgi?id=4056 which should be present on
2004 Jul 27
1
Sad news about JW Schultz
I was saddened to learn today that JW Schultz was found dead back on March 27th of this year. JW was a big help in the recent development of rsync and I sorely missed his presence during the last release cycle. JW was also the author of the Dirvish backup software, and Keith Lofstrom (who provided me with the sad news) has plans to put some memorial information onto the new dirvish site as
2003 Jun 20
1
good snapshot solution
Hi all, I have installed rsync 2.5.5 as daemons on our 35 Netware servers (no 2.5.6 is yet available for Netware) and do a daily sync from a Linux Rsync client machine with 1.2 TB disk capacity. For the moment we do a daily, weekly and monthly backup on tape of this machine, but I'd like to replace the daily backups by a disc-based setup. It would be good to be able to share the
2008 Jun 08
5
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5526] New: problems with rsync -X --link-dest
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5526 Summary: problems with rsync -X --link-dest Product: rsync Version: 3.0.2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: idra@samba.org QAContact:
2007 Jul 19
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4803] New: link-dest folder is not validated
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4803 Summary: link-dest folder is not validated Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: smokin.jake@mac.com
2008 Aug 04
4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5665] New: need option to hard link from source tree to dest tree
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5665 Summary: need option to hard link from source tree to dest tree Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: Dave@Yost.com