similar to: patch for preserving extended posix ACLs

Is anyone looking at supporting the POSIX extended ACLs? Thanks! Trevor

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2706 Summary: An option to transfer POSIX ACLs Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: hashproduct@verizon.net

Hello, I have recently set up a Samba based file server running 3.0.27a. This file server is part of a Windows 2003 domain, with ACL and extended attribute support enabled, and appears to be functioning properly except for one critical issue with the ACLs. When I try to edit the permissions of a file through Windows, the default POSIX ACL that I set up on the filesystem seems to be masking off

Hi, I have 2 linux machines, SOURCE and DEST on a network. I create some snapshots of the file structure on SOURCE and these snapshots have extended attributes. I want to copy the snapshots from SOURCE over to DEST over the network, but I don't want to lose the information on the extended attributes. I don't think that rsync supports this so I was wondering if anyone knew of a protocol

Hi, I have 2 linux machines, SOURCE and DEST on a network. I create some snapshots of the file structure on SOURCE and these snapshots have extended attributes. I want to copy the snapshots from SOURCE over to DEST over the network, but I don't want to lose the information on the extended attributes. Is there a way to do this using the samba protocol? Or do I have to modify the source code to

I'm looking for info on using posix acls in samba. I'd like them to look and feel like nt acls. I'd like to use the windows client to set the acls on the samba server. I've got the official samba 3 howto book, but can't seem to figure things out from there. specifically, in the past I've used a force group entry in combined with create modes to keep shared files access to

Hello Rsync open source community, We are in the process of the data migration from RHEL NFS Server into NetApp using "rsync 3.1.3 with -XAavzHP -inplace --filter= '-x system.posix_acl' /source_NFSv4 /destination_NFSv4 " options : Current NFS Exports have legacy POSIX ACLs applied on some files, the reason we are using "-XA" is because we also have NFS v4 ACLs

This might be more inclusive if I said, Linux Permissions vs POSIX ACLs vs vfs_xattr. I have recently begun to discover the power and flexibility of using POSIX ACLs (by mounting my EXT3/4 filesystems with the acl option). This solved alot of security permissions issues between Samba and Linux groups of users. As I have delved into this deeper and begun using the VFS object, vfs_xattr, things

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13820 Bug ID: 13820 Summary: rsync is not preserving ACLs Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayne at opencoder.net Reporter: dinesh.k at

Hello samba team ! On my network, I mainly manage my AD users and computers from Unix using shell scripts. So I would like to set the shares' ACLs directly from the DC with the POSIX setfacl command. When exporting with NFSv4, the POSIX ACLs are conserved. I can set the permissions the same manner as for my local users. But on DC, the "rwx" right is mapped to "full

On 17/11/16 13:15, Reinald Gfuellner via samba wrote: > I try to set up a Samba4-based Fileserver in an Samba3-DC enviroment. > Filesystem is ext4, CIFS + NFS4 should be provided. The same ACLs should > be used over both protocols. > > With Samba 3 this was possible (using POSIX 1003.1e DRAFT 17 ACLs only) > . How can I do the same with Samba 4 ? > > Posix-ACLs set on

On Thu, 2019-11-14 at 06:19 +0000, Ghassan Elrayah via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to create a build on CircleCi with smaba4 AD. It seems > the filesytem doesn't support ACL's, which s3fs requires. I get the > folowing error: Can you explain a bit more about what you are doing with CircleCI? This will help me understand how best to advise you. >

Hi all, we are experiencing difficulties with posix ACLs using samba 3.0.28 on a Debian 4.0 etch server. The goal is to not let the Windows clients manage the ACLs but instead set the permissions from the Samba server, hence smb.conf says "nt acl support = no". Problems arise when I have a directory with default permissions for a named group, e.g. # file: ACLTest # owner: juergen #

hi smbusers, would like to ask some questions about posix acls and reiserfs.help and info is much appreciated.(to make it clear i am running mandriva 2007 free edition with samba 3.0.23d installed.) 1. is acl supported now on reiserfs filesystems by default? 2. do i have to recompile the kernel and apply the acl patch? (i currently have the 2.6.17 kernel) 3.which is best for samba?xfs?ext3? or

We currently set sb->s_flags |= MS_POSIXACL unconditionally, which is incorrect -- it tells the VFS that it shouldn''t set umask because we will, yet we don''t set it ourselves if we aren''t using POSIX ACLs, so the umask ends up ignored. Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

I'm going crazy trying to deal with file and directory perms set by Samba's attempt to echo Windows ACLs. I log in directly to my Linux box and tweak ACLs until they work exactly like I wish them to. But when I then access those files through Samba, I get _different_results_, apparently because Samba is trying awfully hard to emulate Windows. How can I tell Samba when handling perms to

Hi all, I can make a simple change to smbd for the next stable release that will cause POSIX ACLs to be checked before returning the DOS mode of a file is "read-only". This will fix the case that people are complaining about where a POSIX ACL allows write access to a file but the standard owner "w" bit is missing (smbd currently returns DOS read-only for that case if the DOS

Hello, I have installed Dovecot 2.0.19 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. I have set up a very basic IMAP configuration. I have two different laptops running Outlook (one MacOS, one Windows 7) and I have configured both to connect to the Dovecot service. My problem is, emails in MIME format that I synchronise from one Outlook client are not being correctly decoded as MIME messages on the other client.

Hello all, Apologies for the repost, but I am really struggling to solve this problem... I have installed Dovecot 2.0.19 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. I have set up a very basic IMAP configuration. I have two different laptops running MS Outlook (one MacOS, one Windows 7) and I have configured both to connect to the Dovecot service. My problem is, emails in MIME format that I synchronise from

Hi list, i'm using Samba 3.0.14a as standalone-pdc with posix-acl-features. On the fileserver i've mounted an ext3 partition to /home /dev/hdc2 /home type ext3 (rw,usrquota,acl) The following directory structur exists on /home /home +-/public_folder (exported per samba as \\fileserver\public ) | +-/a | +-/a_ann | | +-/anyfolder | | +- anyfiles | +-/a_bert | +-/a_sven | +-/a_eve |