similar to: rsync process life cycle

I've added ODBC database logging to rsync, and was wondering what the procedure is to submit my code changes to be (hopefully) included into the main development branch of rsync. I've added everything in such a way that ODBC database logging is only included with a configure option, and otherwise not compiled in. Is there any interest in ODBC database logging for Rsync? If so should I

I've noticed this problem for a while and thought it was my own changes to rsync causing them. I've recently done some tests with vanilla versions of rsync though, and found the same problem. Here's the details. The generator process on an rsync server seems to get stuck in an infinite loop after a client process dies. (The receiver process dies just fine). I can produce this

I've gotten around to testing the generator hang bug using stunnel under 2.6.7, and I still occasionally get the same problem. It seems to be around 50% of the time. Here's some strace output from the generator and receiver from two runs, one where the generator exits properly, and one where it doesn't. Run 2 hangs indefinately. Run 1 Generator: Process 14581 attached - interrupt

I'm using rsync to backup multiple directories, i.e. rsync -azq --delete --relative /dog /cat /fish user@rsync-server::modulename Everything works fine, except if I remove a directory from the list of those being backed up, it isn't deleted on the other side. For example: rsync -azq --delete --relative /dog /cat /fish user@rsync-server::modulename /dog /cat /fish are all backed up to

Greetings. In testing an rsync backup script I'd created, I made a mistake and aborted the running script with a ctrl-C keyboard interrupt. The command that was running at the time was as follows: ${RSYNC_CMD} -aNHAXx --protect-args --fileflags --force-change --rsync-path="/usr/local/bin/rsync" <username>@<my.server.com>:${CPY_SRC} ${CPY_DEST} The expected data

Cloud Computing and Rails are a natural good fit. With tools provided by New Relic integrated into the RightScale Deployment and Monitoring platform you have a Best Practice Monitoring system. I Deploy and Watch servers all day as part of the http://myCloudWatcher.com service. When I started to build the demo for this next RightScale Webinar I learned more about my application in the first few

Hi, It states on page 140 of Agile Web Development with Rails: Here?s the bottom line: even if a test method updates the test database, the database is put back to its default state before the next test method is run. This is important because we don?t want tests to become dependent on the results of previous tests. Well, I''ve been running into a brick wall with some functional tests

Hello everyone,  There's something really important about climate change and how many institutions around the globe are looking for softwares solutions in order to achieve they (and everyone) needs to improve life conditions in all the planet. Currently, they're many comercial softwares working with this important topic named as: "Life Cycle Assesment", monitoring carbon emition,

Context: We use MCJIT to generate machine code in our LLVM based JIT compiler. The code generation process has roughly 5 steps: 0. Generate and optimize LLVM IR. 1. Call generateCodeForModule on the output of (0) to translate LLVM IR to machine code. 2. Figure out the final locations for the code and data generated by MCJIT using an allocator specific to our runtime. Make

Recently I tried to turn on SSH on my 12 year old APC-UPS.? I soon discovered that I couldn't connect to it because my newer version of openssh doesn't support RSA key sizes below 1024 bits. I'd rather not dredge up a big fight, but I _would_ like to express a desire for some form of overriding the minimum key size.? Basically I've had to turn on telnet access again, lowering

I'm not sure keepalive is working the way I think it's supposed to. Here's my test. I've got a large file (approx 1 gig) on the rsync server, and I append a character on the end to make it slightly different. I fire up rsync on the client side and everything works fine until I hit the timeout value. I have this problems when I have a timeout of below 90 seconds. I've tried

On 12/26/19 6:35 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2019/12/25 21:02, Steve Sether wrote: >> Basically I've had to turn on telnet access again, lowering security. > Does it really lower security? The very old embedded OS is not going to > be secure anyway, this type of device should only be used on a trusted > private network. (New embedded OS are often not much better so

hi all- been reading through the archives but I still can't seem to find a solution to my problem. I am using rsync to keep mirror copies of content which is being served (via http) on both the sender and receiver. The files on average are 20-50mb each, (mostly already in a compressed format... mp3, etc) and both sender and receiver pushes around 30mbps on average. the sender is a

I filed this as bug 4150 http://rsync.samba.org/cgi-bin/rsync/ We had a few hundred hung processes and reached the limit for "max user processes" (see the ulimit command). rsync did not handle this very well. It passed -1 as a PID to kill(). When kill() gets -1, it kills all of the processes owned by that user, or if run by root, all processes. I attached a one line fix. Let me

Hello, I have been working on a project to Openssl'ify Rsync. I am having problems when Rsync forks two processes to handle a sender and was wondering if anyone else would be able to lend a hand or some pointers. I have posted to mailing.openssl.dev Basically, I have brought up Rsync 2.5.5 on cygwin. It goes through the Openssl init and then waits on accept. When it accepts, it forks

Hi, Does anybody know of a VoIP compatible doorbell or door intercom unit? I've contemplated buying a cheap SIP phone, ripping it apart, and putting it inside an IP66 sealed unit... It would need: - At least one speed-dial key, or some way to make every button dial the same extension number - PoE (power over ethernet), so I can power it off the central switch - cheap enough to rip apart

Hi, I am using rsync 3.0.4 on a WinXP machine (with CygWin) to synchronize my files to a RedHat Linux server. Everything is working perfectly, but there is one thing I do not understand. Apparently there is a difference in pushing and pulling files with rsync. When I push my files to the server with this command, I see one rsync process on my WinXP machine, just as expected rsync -rlt -e

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5728 Summary: Rsync --min-size and --max-size filter too late in the process. Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

I'd like to patch the generator hang bug recently fixed in my production environment, but it'd be nice to know if a 2.6.7 release is just around the corner. Do you have any kind of estimate on a release date Wayne? I don't care about specifics, but a general idea (a couple weeks, or a couple months) would help a lot in my decision making process.

Hi, Rsync 3.0.5 on both sides. receiver is Open Solaris and sender is Linux. I got a nested directory - relatively depth but still it should work. It fails instead. sending daemon args: --server --sender -vvlWHogDtpre.is --ignore-errors --numeric-ids --inplace . TEST/ receiving incremental file list delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file [...] overflow: xflags=0x7a