similar to: rsync and large files

Hello, What would be the expected behaviour of rsync, synchronizing a file that is changing in size. If I have a file ( say 100G ) that is being gzipped, and I start an rsync of that file system to a remote location, would rsync just send the data of that gzip file that exists on disk at that point in time, or would it keep looping seeing that the file is changing. Thanks, Sameer

Hello, I am synchronizing one ~15GB file over the network. This file from the previous day exists on the destination and I synchronized today's file over. This is the output. Number of files: 1 Number of files transferred: 1 Total file size: 15919685632 bytes Total transferred file size: 15919685632 bytes Literal data: 6208029752 bytes Matched data: 9711655880 bytes File list size: 44

Hi, I have 2 linux machines on a Gig network. What would be the reason for getting a timeout error. We have --timeout=600 in the command. The version of rsync is 2.6.2. There are no evident network problems otherwise. The command used is rsync -a --delete --timeout=600 --stats --rsh="ssh -p 22" /localdata/ server:/remotedata/ io timeout after 600 seconds - exiting rsync error:

Hi, I am getting *Can't provide secure audio requested in SDP offer* with sipml5 client hosted on my local system [1060] ; This will be WebRTC client type=friend username=1060 ; The Auth user for SIP.js host=dynamic ; Allows any host to register secret=sameer ; The SIP Password for SIP.js encryption=yes ; Tell Asterisk to use encryption for this peer avpf=yes ; Tell Asterisk to use AVPF

Hey guys Is it possible to record with mixmonitor straight into mp3. I am trying to reduce disk space and want my calls to be recorded in mp3 Instead of wav. Sent from Samsung Mobile <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Sameer Rathod <sameer at hostnsoft.com> </div><div>Date:30/06/2014 9:23 PM (GMT+02:00) </div><div>To:

Hi, I have updated the review here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723 As Sameer pointed out, the motivation is: In OpenCL 2.x, two atomic operations on the same atomic object need to have the same scope to prevent a data race. This derives from the definition of "inclusive scope" in OpenCL 2.x. Encoding OpenCL 2.x scope as metadata in LLVM IR would be a problem because there cannot be a

Hi Preston, I was wondering ... "Bottom" is a bit overloaded as far as terms go. Would SCEVNaN be a better name for this beast? Sameer. > -----Original Message----- > From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On > Behalf Of Sameer Sahasrabuddhe > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 9:16 AM > To: preston.briggs at gmail.com > Cc: LLVM

On 1/9/2015 4:14 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Sahasrabuddhe, Sameer > <sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com <mailto:sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com>> > wrote: > > Here's what this looks like to me: > > 1. LLVM text format will use string symbols for memory scopes, > and not numbers. The set of strings is target

> On Aug 17, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Zhuravlyov, Konstantin <Konstantin.Zhuravlyov at amd.com> wrote: > > >Why not going with a metadata attachment directly and kill the "singlethread" keyword? Something like: > >Something like: > > cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 0 monotonic monotonic, 3, !memory.scope{!42} > > cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 0 monotonic

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:27 PM, Sameer Sahasrabuddhe < sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com> wrote: > Ping! We need to close on whether everyone is convinced that symbolic > memory scopes have a significant advantage over opaque numbers. Either of > them will be examined by optimizations using a target-implemented API. I > personally don't think that readability in the LLVM

On 11/19/2014 4:05 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Sahasrabuddhe, Sameer > <sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com <mailto:sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com>> > wrote: > > 1. Update the synchronization scope field in atomic instructions > from a > single bit to a wider field, say 32-bit unsigned integer. > > > I

I've not had a good chance to look at the patches in detail, but just to clarify one point: I don't really care whether we number things going up or down from single threaded to "every thread". I just think it makes sense to expose them in the in-memory IR interface as an enum with a particular ordering so that code can use the obvious sorts of tests for comparing two orderings

> On Nov 18, 2014, at 2:35 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Sahasrabuddhe, Sameer <sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com <mailto:sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com>> wrote: > 1. Update the synchronization scope field in atomic instructions from a > single bit to a wider field, say 32-bit unsigned integer.

linux/vhost.h was included twice. Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat at linaro.org> --- drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c index 73bbc46..798792b 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ #include <linux/ctype.h>

linux/vhost.h was included twice. Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat at linaro.org> --- drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c index 73bbc46..798792b 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/tcm_vhost.c @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ #include <linux/ctype.h>

Hi All, I am trying to write a machine learning algorithm that would predict a good optimization to apply to a given function. I wanted to perform this by modifying the list of optimizations applied by the FPPassManager based on some dynamic data. At present I was trying to do this by modifying the FPPassManager::runOnFunction(Function) implementation. However this is causing the following error:

Hi Sameer, > On Jan 5, 2015, at 4:51 AM, Sahasrabuddhe, Sameer <Sameer.Sahasrabuddhe at amd.com> wrote: > > Right. The second version of my patches fixes the bitcode encoding. But now I see another potential problem with future bitcode if we require an ordering on the scopes. What happens when a backend later introduces a new scope that goes into the middle of the order? If they

Problem with this is client needs to listen to the call recordings and my interface will only display .wav or .mp3 so they will moan if they have to wait until the next day for today's recordings Sent from Samsung Mobile <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: binary <dreamer.binary at gmail.com> </div><div>Date:01/07/2014 6:09 PM

> On Aug 21, 2016, at 11:14 AM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > > On 08/17/2016 03:05 PM, Mehdi Amini wrote: >> >>> On Aug 17, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Zhuravlyov, Konstantin <Konstantin.Zhuravlyov at amd.com <mailto:Konstantin.Zhuravlyov at amd.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >Why not going with a metadata attachment directly

Is there a vorbis plug-in for Real Player or the Windows Media Player? Sameer -- Sameer Verma Asst. Professor of Information Systems San Francisco State University San Francisco CA 94132 USA http://verma.sfsu.edu/ --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to