similar to: [Bug 2783] Random high loads during syncs (server side) / client stream errors

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2783 Summary: Random high loads during syncs (server side) / client stream errors Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All URL: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83254 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2783 ------- Additional Comments From samba-mirror@planetmirror.com 2005-07-18 18:08 ------- We at PlanetMirror see this error regularly from our upstream gentoo mirrors, as well as a plethora of other upstream mirrors. Personally, while I hope this fix in 2.6.5 resolves the problems, what you're suggesting here will make a mammoth task for

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2783 tim.liim at alcatel-lucent.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tim.liim at alcatel-lucent.com ------- Comment #6 from tim.liim at alcatel-lucent.com 2010-10-27 00:27 CST ------- These

I use rsync regularly for backups of large trees, sometimes over low bandwidth links, and I would like to suggest a potentially major speedup under some circumstances, where files or folders are moved or renamed. The principle is simple : often people rename a file, or move it from one folder to another. Current behaviour (please correct me if I am wrong) is for wget to see this as a

Hi all, Allow me to quickly sketch our backup situation: we have about 40 sites. On each site there's a Rsync client on an NT machine (Cygwin). In the main site we have a huge Win2K fileserver which acts as a Rsync server. I'm doing tests now with syncing the volumes of several Netware servers on the sites (to which the Rsync NT clients have a mapping) to the Win2K server. Initially we

Hi, i have to tranfer large files each 5-100 GB (mo-fri) over dsl line. unfortunately dsl lines are often not very stable and i got a broken pipe error. (dsl lines are getting a new ip if they are broken or at least after a reconnect every 24 hours) i had a script which detect the rsync error and restart the transmission. this means that if a file has transfered e.g. 80 % i start again from

Hello, I use rsync (among many other things) as an incremental backup tool. Every night I save /{home,etc,var} from several servers. On one of them we keep 52 weeks of system logs, so each time syslog is rotated all old syslog.x.gz (where x is between 1 and 213) change names. This impacts our backup transfers because the incremental snapshot now has to include all syslog.x.gz files even though

Mark, The patch seems to cause problems if there are any transfer interruptions (as mentioned in the comments in the patch). However, even on a retransfer, the earlier partially transferred file is not fixed, although the client appears to think the transfer has completed successfully. This appears to be a serious bug. Note: Both client and server have the inplace patch, and on Linux platforms

Hi, Anybody knows how rsync transfer one single file if there is difference between the two files, will rsync re-transfer the whole file or only transfer the difference? In my experiment, i found rsync would retranster the whole file again if there's a difference. What I did were: I manually created a huge.txt (file size 100813288 ), run rsync command to transfer this file from server 1 to

Hi all, wouldn't it be much more comfortable if rsync would delete every sent file just after completing the single file transfer? Thus one could transfer files that could be processed by the receiver and there get moved or deleted avter processing. With large directories and e.g. wireless connections rsync connection could break up and could be restarted without the possibility to

On 7/11/06, Ahmed Ibn Fahdlan <d13warrior@msn.com> wrote: > Scenario :: > > on SRC I had A and B dir on the same share. A dir has 100 files while B > is empty. > then rsync to Destination... 100% sucess. > > Then all files on A dir has been MOVE to B dir. > What is the rsync option if i dont want to sync the files on source B dir > but rather check > if it

I think somebody had a similar problem (also on Solaris), but that thread seemed to die. I've compiled (with Sun Studio cc) and installed samba-3.2.1 on a Solaris 10 x64 box, which is a member of a (Windows Server 2003 controlled) domain. I previously had samba 3.0.28a running on the same machine without any problems. Now winbindd is eating up all of the CPU (on the CPU it's assigned

Hi, I'm wondering if this feature is implemented in icecast2? It was in icecast 1.x, and I found it very useful... <p>Akos --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No

I'll continue the discussion here, since it may be a more appropriate place then in the bugzilla. Regarding the above bug, found at http://bugs.xiph.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313 the last remark is: > Allowing connecting clients to specify a dump file will not be > implemented in the forseeable future, unless a patch is contributed > (it's a large amount of work to do so). > >

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Narendra Sisodiya <narendra at narendrasisodiya.com> wrote: > What data I want to add ? > basically on my website there are various images. each image having ?a > number. While I deliver my lecture I want to send image number too. > Now I can send this number using http PUSH/PULL but I do not know How > it will be synchronised ? Because AFAIK

Hi folks, i?m not sure if it is even possible, bu just want to ask: I have to servers connected over vpn. On both sides there is a working directory "Office" where the users are working on but deletion should only be possible on side A. The idea is, that on A and B people can work and save over their 100 Mbit Network quite fast, and in the backround the data get synchronized over

On say 2 out of 10 calls, when on a call, the Audio at our end will drop for about 5 seconds, we can hear them, they can't hear us. It doesn't happen every call, random, which is making it very hard to trouble shoot, I am guessing it has something to do with RTP stream? Nothing has changed this end, yet this has just started happening. Seems to happen at about 2-3mins into a

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2561 Summary: rsync crashes when using the "exclude from" option on server side. Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

I have released rsync version 2.6.5. This is primarily a bug-fix release to squash some annoying problems that made it into the (feature-filled) release of 2.6.4, plus a few minor enhancements. Here is a list of the changes between 2.6.4 and 2.6.5: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS The latest man pages are online in their usual spots: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync.html

I have released rsync version 2.6.5. This is primarily a bug-fix release to squash some annoying problems that made it into the (feature-filled) release of 2.6.4, plus a few minor enhancements. Here is a list of the changes between 2.6.4 and 2.6.5: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS The latest man pages are online in their usual spots: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync.html