similar to: easiest way to do incrimentals?

I am trying to setup a a samba machine as a PDC. There are no windows domains on the network. I just want to startup as a samba PDC so users can login change there passwords access shares and printers. I am running on redhat es 4 with samba version 3.0.10.-1.4E It appears to be working but I can't seem to join a computer to the domain. I am joining a windows 2000 pro machine. I am getting the

I have setup samba 3 as a PDC for a set of computers that previously had Domain Users setup to run as local admins under XP, so that anyone that has logged into the domain has local admin access. Whats the best way to replicate this setup so that I don't have to go around to each computer and change the local security policy? Is there a way to assign users to the group domain users? or would

I am trying to backup some samba shares on computera to computerb all accounts on computera match computerb passwords and groups The rsyncd.conf file is as follow [rsync] uid = root gid = root max connections = 10 syslog facility = local5 pid file = /var/run/rsyncd.pid auth users = root secrest file = /etc/.rs_sec [backupshares] path = /home/sharedfolders the /etc/.rs_sec file is

Access Violation running an application calling Borland libraries vcljpg60.bpl, vcl60.bpl. I am using Wine 0.9.10 and Mandriva LE2005. Although I can run several windows application successfully, I have never been able to run one - Heredis8 - that seems to be using Borland libraries (vcljpg60.bpl, vcl60.bpl, and others). The output from running "winedbg Heredis8.exe" is below. There

Hello I've tried to run Delphi's application which uses it's own BPL- libraries. Wine said: err:module:import_dll Library odacvcl70.bpl (which is needed by L"C:\ \Program Files\\UBC.new\\Adwiser2Main.bpl") not found err:module:import_dll Library odacvcl70.bpl (which is needed by L"C:\ \Program Files\\UBC.new\\Oracle.bpl") not found err:module:import_dll Library

The target description .td files are allowed to change the default allocation order on a register class by overriding the allocation_order_begin() and allocation_order_end() methods on TargetRegisterClass. Previously, this was used all the time to filter out stack and frame pointers and other reserved registers. I was able to remove most of these custom allocation orders in the tree because the

Since the getelementptrs were implicitly generated by the CreateStore/Load I'm not sure how to get access to them. So I hacked the assignment to be done thrice: once using a manual decomposition into two GEPs and stores, once using the "big" CreateStore, once via the setGlobal function, printing addresses and memory contents at each point to the degree that I have access to them.

Hi all, i've installed Delphi7ENT and DevExpr_v45 components on wine. When i launch delphi i get this error: Can't load package C:\Programmi\DevExpress\Library\Delphi7 \dclcxPivotGridD7.bpl. I get this for each .bpl in C:\Programmi\DevExpress\Library\Delphi7\ It seems like delphi can't find them, but every file is present, readable and executable. Any ideas? Delphi 7 Enterprise

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Nikodemus Siivola < nikodemus at random-state.net> wrote: > Uh. Turns out that if I hide the pointer to @foo from LLVM by passing it > through an opaque identity function ... then everything works fine. > > Is this a bug in LLVM or is there some magic involving globals I'm > misunderstanding? > This looks like a bug in the handling of

The log message for revision 122213 says: > Change the X86 backend to stop using the evil ADDC/ADDE/SUBC/SUBE nodes (which > their carry depenedencies with MVT::Flag operands) and use clean and beautiful > EFLAGS dependences instead. (MVT::Flag has since been renamed to MVT::Glue.) That revision made bug 8404 go away. Am I right in thinking that one of the problems with MVT::Glue is

That's useful to know that the static compilation code path works. Furthermore, as expected from that: 52: c7 05 04 00 00 00 d5 00 00 00 movl $213, 4 00000054: IMAGE_REL_I386_DIR32 _foo It looks like the offset `4` of the second field of your struct is correct in the object file, so this does seem to be a problem in the JIT-specific linking/loading.

On Oct 15, 2008, at 5:29 AM, sanjiv gupta wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 10:19 -0700, Evan Cheng wrote: >> You need to specify sub-register == super-register, idx relationship. >> See X86RegisterInfo.td: >> >> def x86_subreg_8bit : PatLeaf<(i32 1)>; >> def x86_subreg_16bit : PatLeaf<(i32 2)>; >> def x86_subreg_32bit : PatLeaf<(i32

Hi, I can not run on ubuntu with wine-1.0.1. a program developed in Borland C + + (Windows) command line. When I type: ams at cluster01:~/test$ wine Main.exe the message appears: fixme:ntdll:find_reg_tz_info Can't find matching timezone information in the registry for bias 180, std (d/m/y): 0/00/0000, dlt (d/m/y): 0/00/0000 Application tried to create a window, but no driver could be

My code was hinky, but only in the sense that I was accidentally duplicating the definition variable in the module where the function was. With only the declaration in the second module loading the bitcode reproduces the issue. Managed an lli reproduction: $ cat jit-0.ll target datalayout = "e-m:x-p:32:32-i64:64-f80:32-n8:16:32-a:0:32-S32" target triple =

On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 10:19 -0700, Evan Cheng wrote: > You need to specify sub-register == super-register, idx relationship. > See X86RegisterInfo.td: > > def x86_subreg_8bit : PatLeaf<(i32 1)>; > def x86_subreg_16bit : PatLeaf<(i32 2)>; > def x86_subreg_32bit : PatLeaf<(i32 3)>; > > def : SubRegSet<1, [AX, CX, DX, BX, SP, BP, SI, DI, >

You are right about your interpretation of "dead". The case here is that RSP is a reserved register and so its liveness isn't really tracked. The "implicit-def dead" is an idiom used to mean that the register (reserved or not) is clobbered. The other implicit uses/defs can come from instruction definitions to indicate that this instruction uses and/or modifies a given

You need to specify sub-register == super-register, idx relationship. See X86RegisterInfo.td: def x86_subreg_8bit : PatLeaf<(i32 1)>; def x86_subreg_16bit : PatLeaf<(i32 2)>; def x86_subreg_32bit : PatLeaf<(i32 3)>; def : SubRegSet<1, [AX, CX, DX, BX, SP, BP, SI, DI, R8W, R9W, R10W, R11W, R12W, R13W, R14W, R15W], [AL, CL,

Hi-- I'd like to calculate the MOS score (or R-factor) using the ITU-T E-Model (see https://www.itu.int/ITU-T/studygroups/com12/emodelv1/tut.htm) for Opus and/or Silk codecs: - Opus NB, MB, WD, and SWB - SILK NB, MB, WD, and SWB However, some of the required parameters are missing, in particular: - Bpl: packet loss robustness factor and - Ie-eff: equipment impairment factor Does

Hi, I hate to have my first post be a bug, but this drove me crazy for a while. I compiled the latest version from source and followed the instalation instructions. I then copied the xinetd.d entries from the Wiki and proceded to test. No matter what I did I could not log on. I found that while I was editing /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf, nothing was hapening. I then started it manualy and found

Hi, My understanding of a "dead" register is a def that is never used. However, when I dump the MI after reg alloc on a simple program I see the following sequence: ADJCALLSTACKDOWN64 0, 0, 0, *implicit-def dead %rsp*, implicit-def dead %eflags, implicit-def dead %ssp, implicit %rsp, implicit %ssp CALL64pcrel32 @foo, <regmask %bh %bl %bp %bpl %bx %ebp %ebx %rbp %rbx %r12 %r13 %r14