similar to: [Bug 2706] New: An option to transfer POSIX ACLs

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2706 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-05-16 10:01 ------- There is the acls.diff file in the patches directory

I wrote a patch for rsync 2.6.6 that changes two things: (1) When the receiving rsync creates a file in a directory with a default ACL and `--perms' is off, rsync uses the default ACL instead of the umask to calculate the new file's permissions. All programs that just use `open' and don't do an explicit `chmod' are forward-compatible with default ACLs, but rsync always sets

We are using SAMBA 3.6.6 on Centos 5 with the acl_tdb VFS module. Our share is backed by storage on a SAN devices that does not support ACLs or extended attributes ... so we're trying the acl_tdb module as a mechanism to support Windows ACLs. We have verified that samba has ACL support enabled, and ACL support works find if we export the share from the local EXT4 filesystem. When trying to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3549 Summary: rsync applies umask to some directories even when a default ACL takes effect Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

Rsync people, Tell me if I'm wrong, but rsync seems to have a very serious race condition that would make it risky to transfer files into a directory writable by someone you don't trust if permissions are going to be granted to other people on those files. The rsync receiver creates a half-transferred file with 600 or 700 permissions; then the receiver writes the data and finalizes the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3543 Summary: [ACL] rsync calls default_perms_for_dir on omitted implied dirs before ensuring they exist Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

Today I went to back up my computer to an external disk with rsnapshot. I have two copies of the Linux kernel; a few files differ, but matching files are hard-linked between the two trees to save space. Since I didn't give -H to rsync, it is making a separate file on the backup disk from each hard link on the source. I had the understanding that -H used an O(n^2) algorithm to match up hard

I forward Maynard's suggestions to the list. -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Maynard Handley <name99@name99.org> To: Matt McCutchen <hashproduct@verizon.net> Subject: Re: How to use multiple link-dest directories? Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:31:56 -0800 Great. That's exactly the sort of answer I wanted. I'll try it tonight. (BTW, I guess maybe it got lost since I

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3829 Summary: rsync loses access ACLs on transferred files Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: hashproduct+rsync@gmail.com

Hey rsync people, Here's a really radical idea and a possible future direction for the rsync project to explore. It occurs to me that tar and rsync are closely related in their purposes. "tar -c (blah) | tar -x" can be used to copy files; rsync's setup with a sender process and a receiver process is strikingly similar. The only major conceptual difference is that the rsync

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3596 Summary: rsync fails to retouch S_IWUSR when transferring a single empty directory Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Hi, Recently I'm trying Samba over Ceph (kernel client) mount. I encounter error when I add permission to file/directory for an additional user from Windows Explorer. Since Ceph does not support posix ACL operation for now, I was thinking that vfs_acl_xattr/vfs_acl_tdb with option "ignore system acls = yes" can workaround this issue but fail. From the man page of vfs_acl_xattr:

Hiya. I've got an XFS partition, have compiled and installed all the XFS stuff, then compiled (with --with-acl-support) samba, which then returns: checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL support... yes Using posix ACLs So it would seem to me that ACLs would be supported. So then I install and run it, add the box to the (Samba 2.2.2)

Yep I tried those two options, and nothing... Even if the pre-user conf files have a log file in the same directory, which I touch before trying, messages keep going to syslog... I tried with 666 permissions on rsyncd.log too just to make sure... The following is one of the user's conf file, hope theres a clue. Thanks! log file = /home/pluto/rsyncd.log <<< This is the problem!!

Wayne, Attached is a patch worth of suggested man page improvements for --no-implied-dirs and --keep-dirlinks. I think new users would find my explanations clearer and more complete, although you may want to make additional changes. I regenerated rsync.1 and the patch includes changes to it, but my yodl is somewhat weird, so I suggest you run yodl again yourself. -- Matt McCutchen

Wayne, I have redone get_local_name again (patch attached), this time to enable rsync to remove a file to make way for a destination directory; this resolves the "surprise" noted in David Tonhofer's diagram 2. I also made it obey --keep-dirlinks when looking for a destination directory and made various rearrangements. Tell me what you think, and if you decide to commit my code,

We currently set sb->s_flags |= MS_POSIXACL unconditionally, which is incorrect -- it tells the VFS that it shouldn''t set umask because we will, yet we don''t set it ourselves if we aren''t using POSIX ACLs, so the umask ends up ignored. Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> --- fs/btrfs/super.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

Hi! I am experiencing troubles concerning the inheritance of the setgid bit if a new mailbox is created with dovecot-lda. If it is created with dovecot/imap, everything works fine. dovecot-lda is called from postfix like this: ---------- mailbox_command = /usr/local/sbin/postfix-lda.sh ---------- logger -p mail.info -t postfix-lda "H: $HOME, S: $SENDER, R: $RECIPIENT, U: $(umask), id:

[username@localhost source]# ./configure --with-fhs --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --with-privatedir=/etc/samba --with-lockdir=/var/state/samba --localstatedir=/var --with-netatalk --with-smbmount --with-pam --with-syslog --with-sambabook --with-utmp --with-acl-support > ~/myconfig.out 2>&1 [username@localhost source]# cat ~/myconfig.out | grep acl checking for sys/acl.h... yes

Rsync people, I am preparing to overhaul my Web site's build system, and I am looking for a convenient way to collect files and directories from various places on my computer and put them at various locations inside a destination directory to be posted to my Web site. So far, my script has been running rsync once for each source, but this is too slow. Is there a way to get rsync to collect