similar to: (no subject)

Hello, Since Tiger, we do not need to get RsyncX since the version shipped handles resource forks with the -E option. However, I get some strange results. Indeed, when I sync two directories (on the same machine for a start), if the files synched are regular Unix files (without resources) for example an XCode Java project with lots of Java files, everything works fine. Between two syncs,

Hello list, I am doing something really simple. It worked twice and now fails for an unknown reason. I am on MacOSX (Tiger) and I am simply making a backup of a volume on an external Firewire drive. Here is the command I am using (which went fine for the first 2 rsyncs). I tried to stop some processes, I looked into the drives directory tree but nothing seemed bad. Any idea?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1791 Summary: using --delete with single directory mirroring doesn't delete files Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

It is my understanding after reading all manuals and postings that --delete only works, when rsync is doing recursive dir-to-dir synchronization. Like in the following example local host: /dir/dira /dir/dirb /dir/dirb/file2 remote host: /dir/dira /dir/dira/file1 /dir/dirb /dir/dirb/file2 If we do [CASE 1] rsync -rR -v --delete /dir/dira /dir/dirb remote:/ we have it right building file

Hi all, I have been using rsync to copy multiple dirs, eg: rsync -aR dira dirb /tmp Now, I no longer want to copy dirb, and I want it to be removed on the remote side, and I cannot figure how to achieve this. I tried: rsync -aR --exclude=dirb --exclude-deleted dira dirb /tmp but this has no effect. I have searched for similar posts, and found:

Hi list, I try to keep a local file tree synchronized with the remote one. However, using the --delete option does not work as expected or at least as I whish it would. Here is an example of the local tree I'd like to sync: /dirA/subDirA /subDirB /dirB/subDirC On the remote machine I have: /dirA/subDirA /subDirB /dirB/subDirC /dirC Here is the rsync call I use: Executing rsync

Hi all, When I try to make a connection to our windows server with smbclient: smbclient //server/dira/dirb/dirc -U username -W workgroup Password: ***** I get a working ftp-like connection to our data. When I try to make the same connection with mount.cifs: mount.cifs //server/dira/dirb/dirc /mnt/mnt_dir -o user=877790 dom=workgroup Password: ***** I get a mount to a location which appears

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4378 Summary: Handling of symbolic links Product: rsync Version: 2.6.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: michael.schliephake@t-online.de

On 11/10/2015 12:16 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > Well, be fair, rsync can also miss files if files are changing while the backup occurs. Once rsync has passed through a given section of the tree, it will not see any subsequent changes. I think you miss my meaning. Consider this sequence of events: * "find" begins and processes dirA and then dirB * another application writes

Hi, I have this webroot /webdir/ with 2775 permission so that any created file/directory by apache inside of /webdir/ will be 'users:webusers'. However, I noticed when the apache created a new files (fileB) / directories (dirB), the ownership becomes 'apache:apache' and the sgid has gone for /webdir/ (drwxrwxr-x). I'm currently using Wordpress. [before] drwxrwsr-x users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/15 21:05, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/10/2015 12:16 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> >> Well, be fair, rsync can also miss files if files are changing >> while the backup occurs. Once rsync has passed through a given >> section of the tree, it will not see any subsequent changes. > > I think you miss my

Hello, I've been struggling to get RSync to work between two NT workstations (I'll call them A and B). I've got Cygwin installed on both and RSync running as a service on machine A. I want to replicate some files on machine A to machine B. I issue the RSync command on machine B and here is what I get.... (Issued on machine B): rsync.exe --verbose --stats --archive --delete

Hello all.. Using dtrace on solaris 10, i could investigate a performance issue with the sincronization of some files on a ZFS filesystem. I have started the follow rsync command (inside a gnome-terminal): /opt/sfw/bin/rsync -av -e ssh user@IP:/DirA/DirB . The current directory(.), was a ZFS pool with two SATA discs (mirror)... The performance was terrible. After some tests with raid0,

The config.c32 module (and the CONFIG directive) is not behaving as expected when using syslinux.exe 5.00pre11 as installer. To replicate: 1_ The content of the device: /dira /cat.c32 /config.c32 /ldlinux.c32 /ldlinux.sys /libcom32.c32 /pwd.c32 /syslinux.cfg /dira/dira.cfg 2_ Content of /syslinux.cfg: DEFAULT pwd1 PROMPT 0 LABEL config1 COM32 config.c32 /dira/dira.cfg APPEND /dira/ LABEL

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4899 Summary: When a mounted dir cannot be visited, rsync will halt there and the shell is halted, even "ctrl -c" can't quit it. Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

We currently do backup using rsync amongst Linux and Solaris machines. Modulo an ACL issue that we had to patch, this is working extremely well. But I want to add our OSX machines to the mix. This is, unfortunately, leaving me confused about rsyncx. I can do the normal thing from OSX using rsync. But the page for rsyncx says - cryptically, in my ignorant opinion - that rsyncx adds support for

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7382 Summary: Fails to copy with ACL issue if src user is unknown (OSX 10.6 only) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

I am attempting to backup the Users directory on my desktop running OS X 10.3.6. I am backing up to Jaguar Server 10.2.8. I am using RsyncX version 2.1 on both systems. RsyncX Server is set up to run on both systems however in this instance the Rsync client is my desktop and server is Panther Server. When I kick off an RsyncX session, RsyncX will run for a while, then stop part of the way

********************************************************************** Este email assim como os ficheiros que possa ter em anexo s?o confidenciais e para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou organiza??o para o qual foi enviado. Se recebeu este email por engano por favor notifique Redes@bnc.pt Esta nota confirma que esta mensagem foi verificada pelo MIMEsweeper n?o tendo sido encontrados virus.

Here is the structure of my servers : Source : /home/test1/link_dir sub_dir1 file1 file2 ... sub_dir2 ... Destination: /home/test2/real_dir sub_dir1 file1 file2 ... subdir2