similar to: [Bug 2615] New: rsync hang when using -H

Dear rsync people, Today I tried to back up my computer using rsnapshot with the RPM version of rsync-acl 2.6.9pre1 that I built. I tried twice, and both times, rsync encountered some kind of assertion failure. I was trying to reproduce the crash with rsync-acl 2.6.9pre2 and noticed a different bug (described below); when I have a chance, I will go back and investigate the crash further. Rsync

As those of you who watch CVS will be aware Wayne has been making progress in reducing memory requirements of rsync. Much of what he has done has been the product of discussions between he and myself that started a month ago with John Van Essen. Most recently Wayne has changed how the file_struct and its associated data are allocated, eliminating the string areas. Most of these changes have been

Here's a patch that makes rsync try to find an existing file in a group of hard-linked files so that it doesn't create the first one in the group from scratch if a later file could be used instead. Details: I decided to avoid having the code do an extra scan down the list when we encounter the lead file in the list. This is because it would be bad to have to do the same scan in the

Hi! >From man 5 ssh_config > ControlPath > Specify the path to the control socket used for connection sharing as described in the > ControlMaster section above or the string ``none'' to disable connection sharing. In > the path, `%l' will be substituted by the local host name, `%h' will be substituted by >

Hi, I am pretty new to rsync so this question might have a very trivial answer. Sorry for that then. (using google didn't work though) I want to synchronise the files from my laptop to my machine at work and back from time to time. Both machines have linux (the laptop has fedora core 2 with a 2.6.6 kernel and the remote machine redhat 9 with a 2.6.3 kernel) On the laptop I use rsync

Hi Wayne, I just got this bug report about rsync 3.0.2 reproducibly crashing, together with a backtrace and a patch; very helpful :-) (Please preserve 477931-forwarded@bugs.debian.org in the CC so that you response is archived in the Debian BTS, thanks.) Paul Slootman On Fri 25 Apr 2008, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Subject: Bug#477931: rsync: Segfaults syncing the linux kernel archive. > From:

I found some time in the past week to work on a simple test app that would hopefully help to answer a few questions that came up recently: 1. Can a single-process generator+receiver work well? (Looks good so far, but I haven't run any multi-processor timing tests yet.) 2. How easy is it to use librsync? (Pretty easy.) 3. How small would a transfer-only tool be? (It's currently

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2615 ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2005-04-15 01:05 ------- Created an attachment (id=1161) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=1161&action=view) Fix for sending a single file with -H The fix is to get rid of the attempted optimization where we don't look for matching hard-links if the file-list size

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8979 Summary: rsync daemon: High load while skipping hardlinks Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: simon.klinkert at

Hi All, I have written script to download a directory from remote machine which contains the always the updated data. I want to download that directory onto my local machine periodically with --link-dest option to my old download directory. I have automated the script using " expect scripting" Following script I have written: $> cat ravi.ex #!/usr/bin/expect -- set LDEST

Hi, I am running mentioned rsync version in daemon mode on a x86 machine which is a Gentoo Linux running kernel 2.4.26 and glibc 2.3.3_pre20040207. During the sync from another machine, the rsync daemon hangs; client receives no data and server waits on select() call. when this happens, rsync server process can only be killed by SIGKILL; no timeout occurs on server side. ssh is not being used for

Bugs item #27425, was opened at 2009-11-11 21:15 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=411&aid=27425&group_id=85 Category: win32-open3 Group: Code Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Daniel Berger (djberg96) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: win32-open3 doesn''t build with 1.9.1 Initial Comment: Windows XP VC++ 9

Hi. Here's a patch for copying the atimes of files when -t/--times is given. I bumped the protocol to 29 since it sends more data over the wire. It obviously does not send the atime if it's sending data to an older rsync version. It passes all the tests (including the added atime.test) for me on a: Linux Debian/3.0 gcc 2.95.4 (debian), glibc 2.2.5 system. Any questions/feedback? I

The generator can skip a directory's contents altogether due to --ignore-non-existing, a daemon exclude, or a mkdir failure. On a --dry-run, the generator can also note the missingness of a directory while still scanning its contents. These two scenarios were conflated using a single set of missing_below/missing_dir variables in combination with transient increments in dry_run; this caused

library(xts) library(TTR) ndx = getYahooData("^NDX") aa = ndx$Close bb = aggregate(aa, as.yearweek, tail, 1) The last operation takes forever, and then the bb dates are messed up. The following produces the desired result: time(aa) = as.Date(time(aa)) bb = aggregate(aa, as.yearweek, tail, 1) The index of ndx and aa is of POSIXct (as reported by is(time(ndx))) , which apparently

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- diff -urN rsync-3.0.2-orig/generator.c rsync-3.0.2/generator.c --- rsync-3.0.2-orig/generator.c 2008-03-28 10:30:11.000000000 -0700 +++ rsync-3.0.2/generator.c 2008-05-07 15:35:08.317364774 -0700 @@ -1508,6 +1508,7 @@ if (preserve_links && S_ISLNK(file->mode)) { #ifdef SUPPORT_LINKS + int iflags =

2017-01-10 0:06 GMT+01:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:59 PM Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Sorry I fat fingered an earlier send in the previous email. I was >> trying to say: >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Sanjoy Das >> <sanjoy at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1812 Summary: fuzzy not working in 2.6.3-pre{1,2} Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: egmont@uhulinux.hu

Hi, Sorry I fat fingered an earlier send in the previous email. I was trying to say: On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >> +1 Exactly this. >> I don't think C programmer will not understand using. The "=" makes it much >> simpler to read, even if it is the first time you see it, which is not the >>

On 2/19/2013 12:26 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > void foo() { > auto fp = printf; > fp("xyz\n"); > } > > With -fno-builtin-printf, we can't optimize the call to printf, even though it only becomes apparent after (trivial) devirtualization. Ha. Good example. What would you expect to happen in this case? --- a.cpp --- (with -fno-builtin-printf) pointer