Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Rsync 2.6.4 Multiplexing Overflows when File Name Too Long (cwRsync)"
2006 Dec 28
1
multiplexing overflow
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 07:16:19PM +0300, ????? ??????? wrote:
>/ multiplexing overflow 101:7104843 [receiver]
/
This indicates that the protocol got corrupted somehow because that is
saying that the receiver got a MSG_DELETED message with a 7104843-byte
buffer attached (which rsync is telling you is too big), but you're not
even deleting files. What version of rsync are you using?
== ==
2006 Mar 24
1
buffer overflow in receive_file_entry
I have rsync 2.6.6 on unix source to a cygwin setup on a Windows 2003
server. Was working well, then I moved a folder down one subdirectory
and started getting the following. I assume this means it is having
problems with the length of the file name? I have the same problem with
long file names using cwRsync. Are there any options other than
modifying the file names?
backup# ./820.remote-backup
2009 Apr 23
0
rsync- buffer overflow/broken pipe with critical filename-lenght using cwrsync at server-side
hi everybody,
i?ve a problem with rsync runnig.
constellation:
rsyncserver is cwrsync at win2k-machine (without cygwin-beta against
long filename-problem), client is a linux-ubuntu box.
log from the server: (i just change names with xxx, no special charakters)
this error happens all the time again,
/overflow: flags=0xba l1=240 l2=22
2011 Mar 10
3
[Bug 8001] New: buffer overflow in recv_file_entry (maxpathlen doesn't works)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8001
Summary: buffer overflow in recv_file_entry (maxpathlen doesn't
works)
Product: rsync
Version: 3.0.8
Platform: All
OS/Version: FreeBSD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org
2006 Mar 25
1
Long file names
I believe this post I found is related to a problem I'm having with long
files names...I would like to use cwRsync, does my problem suggest this
is still happening and has not been addressed?
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2005-April/012117.html
However, I have long file name issues using rsync 2.6.6 from a BSD
server to the default Cygwin rsync 2.6.6. Should I (and how do I) apply
2009 Nov 27
1
multiplexing overflow errors
I'm using rsync 3.0.6 between two solaris 8/10 hosts an I frequently get "multiplexing overflow" errors:
log/20091123_223901/dresden.log:multiplexing overflow 101:7104843 [sender]
log/20091123_223901/frankfurt.log:multiplexing overflow 101:7104843 [sender]
log/20091123_223901/hannover.log:multiplexing overflow 101:7104843 [sender]
log/20091123_223901/muenchen.log:multiplexing
2006 Mar 31
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3649] New: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3649
Summary: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.0
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: sambesselink@planet.nl
2006 Mar 17
1
Multiplexing overflow
Hi, List!
I have a problem with rsync. I was trying to synchronize directory trees
on 2 servers and got following error:
multiplexing overflow 101:7104843 [receiver]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(809)
Complete rsync's output:
> /usr/local/bin/rsync -avzp user@host:remote_path local_path
receiving file list ... done
./
DelphiStudio7.rar
2008 Jan 31
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5235] New: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5235
Summary: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.9
Platform: Other
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: rsync@ofdan.co.uk
2009 Feb 16
2
rsync 3.0.5 - ERROR: buffer overflow in recv_file_entry [generator]
Hi,
Rsync 3.0.5 on both sides. receiver is Open Solaris and sender is Linux.
I got a nested directory - relatively depth but still it should work. It
fails instead.
sending daemon args: --server --sender -vvlWHogDtpre.is --ignore-errors
--numeric-ids --inplace . TEST/
receiving incremental file list
delta-transmission disabled for local transfer or --whole-file
[...]
overflow: xflags=0x7a
2008 Aug 18
8
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5701] New: deadlock on local rsyncing, bisected to commit f303b749f2843433c9acd8218a4b9096d0d1bb8d
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5701
Summary: deadlock on local rsyncing, bisected to commit
f303b749f2843433c9acd8218a4b9096d0d1bb8d
Product: rsync
Version: 3.1.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo:
2004 Sep 24
1
cannot send long-named file
Hello,
I have a trouble when rsync tries to tranfer a big size paths files, the log
message is:
"2004/09/22 13:30:40 [4880] cannot send long-named file
"SHARED/Concursos/Correos y Tel?grafos/Concurso Correos_Expdte.
AI04001_Sistema de adm?n. y validaci?n de certif. y firmas digitales/CD
DOCUMENTOS CONCURSO EXPDTE. AI4001/DOCUMENTO 2_Documentaci?n General/3
Solvencia
2008 Jan 02
3
cwRsync on windows
Hi folks,
It may be a very basic question for many people here but I have been
struggling with Windows commandline. My CentOS machines are running
perfectly fine.
Question:
I have installed cwRsync server on one of Windows 2003 and cwRsync
client on the other Windows 2003. What command should I run to connect
to the cwRsync server from the client? and how can I make sure that
cwRsync is even
2004 Aug 12
1
RV: cwrsync and CPU usage
Yes I?m using cwrync 1.2.4 that it contains the 2.6.2 rsync version command.
A problem I have to use cygwin is that I have implemented the cwrsync
command in a script .js (jscript) then... Should I make a new script bash
file for linux? or is it possible call cygwin?s rsync from a DOS shell line
command?
Thank you very much :)
Jos? Luis
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Craig Barratt
2006 Apr 24
1
cwRsync logs
Using cwRsync on Windows, is there any way to get the standard rsync
stats at the end? It does not look like '--stats' is an option for
cwRsync and verbose does not provide the stats.
--
Robert
2010 Jun 25
1
Specific to cwRsync ...
If this isn't the correct list for cwRsync issues, I
apologize and hope someone can point me in the right direction. Otherwise,
keep reading .
I noticed something odd today with one of our backups. I
have an NT 2000 machine that pushes files to a 2003 Server machine and today
someone brought to my attention that the backup seems to have well over
100GiB more than
2011 Nov 25
1
cwRsync got killed...
Last cwrsync was 4.1.0, current is 4.2.0.
It was avail on sourceforge.
Itefix.no decided "we want money for coding and support" - that itself
is not wrong. Though _I_ never needed any rsync help on neither linux
and windows (including mixed) scenarios.
But they killed their sourceforge downloads, all, including past
versions of cwrsync, including source.
The 4.2.0 client is still
2006 May 19
1
cwrsync client log format ??
We were trying to introduce a better client side log format so that we could
get timestamps and module names etc. In the rsync documentation
it looks like you can use --log-format for the client ... there is even a
sentence saying that this format would not interfere with the rsybc daemons
format. We are using cwrsync and when we try and add
--log-format="%o %h [%a] %m (%u) %f %l" The
2003 Dec 11
2
cwRsync 2.5.7
Tevfik
On Tuesday 09 Dec 2003 18:13, Tevfik Karag?lle wrote:
> I would also like to inform that I updated my cwRsync package with the
> latest rsync binary (2.5.7). http://itefix.no/cwrsync
I have tried your rsync 2.5.7 in cygwin under Windows 2000, synchronising to a
windows share on an unknown (probably Windows) file server.
Sorry to report that it hangs at the end of transfer, as did
2004 Oct 18
0
Can't start cwrsync service under Windows XP
Hello list,
I thought all my rsync worries were over last time I posted here, but
unfortunately I was wrong. I am using cwrsync to backup a Windows XP
machine onto a Windows 2000 machine over our LAN. Relevant versions:
cwRsync 1.2.3, Rsync 2.6.2, cygwin1.dll 1.5.9-1, openssh 3.8.1p1-1
This worked for several months, but recently