similar to: [Bug 2554] Output overwrite action

I have a volume at 192.168.0.2 on my local network. I'd like to rsync the entire volume to a backup volume, skip all files already present on the backup volume (same name and the same or earlier timestamp), and include all flags, dates, etc. as applicable to Mac OS X 10.6.x. Can someone tell me the proper command to do this.

Dear all is it possible to rsync in a master-slave scenario saving to slave gzip content? i'm not talking about compression during transfer, i'm talking about -saving- the destination in a compressed format. Example: FROM: -folder_A --file_A --file_B TO: -folder_A --file_A.gz --file_B.gz I know that this won't be a "real" rsync between two folder, but it will be an

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/attachments/20091030/c43a29f5/attachment.html>

Hello All - I'm looking for a switch(es) to ensure rsync indexes the pull of files from remotedir, LIFO (last in first out) and then by .ext type where file basenames are similar. example) file_a.xml ctime of 09:01:07 file_a.jar ctime of 09:01:02 get transfered before file_b.xml ctime of 09:01:45 file_b.jar ctime of 09:01:45 and the .xml of basename $file would always be transferred

I am using llvm for source-to-source inlining. So I did: % llvm-gcc file_a.c file_b.c ... file_n.c -o file % opt -inline -inline-threshold=1000 < file.bc | llc -march=c > outfile.c Can anyone tell me how llvm determines if a function should be inlined, and what roll does "inline-threshold" play ? (Does the example mean that if the function body has fewer than 1000 instructions,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2734 ------- Additional Comments From vanes002@umn.edu 2005-05-21 22:15 ------- Your rsync options (-arRWxn) include -n, so nothing is actually going to get deleted on the destination, even though rsync reports that they are being deleted (which is what -n is for - i.e. to preview what will happen). -- Configure bugmail:

Hi, What''s happening here? require ''windows/path'' require ''windows/unicode'' include Windows::Path include Windows::Unicode file_a = ''bar.txt'' file_w = multi_to_wide(file_a) p PathFindExtensionA(file_a) # ''.txt'' => OK p PathFindExtensionW(file_w) # ''.'' => WRONG Is Ruby chopping the

Hi *, it seems rsync with --fileflags isn't able to work on (already) hardlinked and immutable ("schg") files on FreeBSD. The following scripts will create a simple example for this behaviour: -------------------------------------------------------------- #! /bin/sh # # set -x DIR="/var/tmp/rsync_$(date +%s)/" mkdir "${DIR}/" # Preparing dir_A mkdir

Hi, I am looking for a way to save the result of a function, e.g the lm()-function to a file and reload it afterwards again. I'd like to do that in order to minimize the used memory when running the function in a loop. The actual function I want to store is the evaluate() from the dismo package. I tried it with save() and load() but I am not sure if that is the way I should do it as I

hi everybody this happens when a Domain Admin adds a user-permission set via properties/security in Windows folder_A was created by a Domain Admin new permission - Modify - was added over the folder_A to the user_A user_A created a file_A.txt in folder_A now Domain Admin goes back to the properties of folder_A wanting to change/modify security entries operation fails on windows: "An

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2554 Bug ID: 2554 Summary: UseDNS documentation is misleading Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Documentation Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 03:32:39PM -0500, Long Fei wrote: > I am using llvm for source-to-source inlining. So I did: > > % llvm-gcc file_a.c file_b.c ... file_n.c -o file > % opt -inline -inline-threshold=1000 < file.bc | llc -march=c > outfile.c > > Can anyone tell me how llvm determines if a function should be > inlined, and what roll does

UNSUBSCRIBE AT THE BOTTOM --------------------------------------------------------------- Dear Subscriber/Member, You don't need to spend hundreds of dollars on a DVD burner to backup your DVD's! DVD Professional is the most technologically advanced method of DVD reproduction ever available and it's the only system you will need to create backups of your DVD's that will play in

I've released rsync 2.6.4pre4. I believe that this version will be what gets released as 2.6.4, hopefully on Wednesday. Please try this out and let me know if anything is amiss. All the changes since 2.6.3 are mentioned here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/NEWS You'll also find a preview of the man pages in the same dir (as usual):

I've released rsync 2.6.4pre4. I believe that this version will be what gets released as 2.6.4, hopefully on Wednesday. Please try this out and let me know if anything is amiss. All the changes since 2.6.3 are mentioned here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/NEWS You'll also find a preview of the man pages in the same dir (as usual):

Hello samba people I do not know if it is a bug, but a problem indeed: we have a Sun running solaris 2.7 samba 2.0.6) and NT clients AND a HSM Filesystem called samfs. This keeps data on tapes, and 16kB on disk. A client request a file can leed into grabbing a tape and bring back the data online to disk. 1) NFS Client waits for data until it's coming, even 1 day 2) (NT)/smbclient gets 16k

Hi, I'm just trying to install the DPMA on my Asterisk. I already made the upgrade from Asterisk 1.8.5 to Asterisk 1.8.11-cert2. This is what i did: *mv /usr/lib/asterisk/modules /usr/lib/asterisk/modules-185 * *compiling Asterisk-Cert2 1.8.11* *./configure make make install make config * Afther that i register the DPMA license, and finally copied the * res_digium_phone.so* to

This is probably a dumb question, but I'll ask anyway (I do that - you all know... :-). Due to a bug I found in OOo 2.0, I moved to using OOo 2.3, back when I was still running CentOS 5.0. Now that I have upgraded to 5.1, yum wants to update my OOo from 2.3 BACK to 2.0. Is it possible to get yum to recognize that 2.3 is newer than 2.0, or should I just exclude OOo from the updates? Thanks.

[Mod: Headers modified -- alex] If this is already known, my apologies. It seemed very strange that this worked, so I thought it would be mentionable. On many linux systems(Redhat imparticularly) updatedb is run nightly around 1:00. When it sorts the files that find gets, it creats a few files in /tmp called sort0<pid>000{1,2,etc}. Each is around 512k. The first file is created and filled,

Here are my preliminary tests: 5.2.18 is vulnerable (stock Redhat 3.0.3) 5.3.12 does not appear vulnerable (stock Redhat 4.0, I think) Dave G. <daveg@escape.com> http://www.escape.com/~daveg