similar to: rsync scalability [Virus checked]

I have released rsync 2.6.4pre1 -- the first preview release of 2.6.4. Please try it out and send feedback to the mailing-list or directly to me, as appropriate. For a list of what has changed since 2.6.3, see the NEWS file: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.4pre1-NEWS For the tar file itself, you'll find it here (with its signature):

I have released rsync 2.6.4pre1 -- the first preview release of 2.6.4. Please try it out and send feedback to the mailing-list or directly to me, as appropriate. For a list of what has changed since 2.6.3, see the NEWS file: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/preview/rsync-2.6.4pre1-NEWS For the tar file itself, you'll find it here (with its signature):

Hi, I have two issues with the --bwlimit parameter to rsync which are not mentioned in the FAQ (please correct me if I am wrong): 1. When both an rsync client and an rsync daemon specify the --bwlimit parameter, the client's value overrides the server's value. This could be used in a DOS attack if the client uses a larger value than the server intended. The documentation also is

It's probalby a common question, and I've read the man pages and such, but I need a little bit more help getting this specific task to work right. Basically, I want to mirror home directory structures, and only two files within each home directory, to other machines from a central server. Those files are ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs and ~/.procmailrc. Other files should not be transfered,

On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 12:36, Martin Pool wrote: > On 5 Apr 2004, Donovan Baarda <abo@minkirri.apana.org.au> wrote: > > > librsync needs a whole file checksum. Without it, it silently fails for > > case 1), 3), and 4). > > Yes, a whole-file checksum should be used with it. Presumably > something stronger than md4 like SHA-1. md4 is probably good enough for most

We are using rsync to backup files from a bunch of computers to a central server using rsync in --daemon mode. I've got a problem and are looking for suggestions. I'm not a newbie to rsync and have checked the archives without getting any useable conclusions. Our old server works great - a redhat 7.2 / 2.4.18 machine. But it's getting full and there's no more updates for

On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 14:58 -0800, rsync2eran@tromer.org wrote: > A year ago we discussed the strength of the MD4 hash used by rsync and > librsync, and one of the points mentioned was that only collision > attacks are known on MD4. Could you please forward this into the bug tracker so it's not lost? -- Martin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

Currently rsync has a bit of a problem with very large files. Dynamic block sizes were introduced to try handle that automatically if the user didn't specify a block size. Unfortunately that isn't enough and the block size would need to grow faster than the file. Besides, overly large block sizes mean large amounts of data need to be copied even for small changes. The maths indicate

I´m trying to utilize the new stdlib module, but got stuck after installation on my puppet server. I´ve tried to use the included test file file_line.pp on the server, but it´s only creating the file - but not managing the content. the same problem on my clients (the new provider file_line has been synced), it´s just not working: file_line { ''puppet master host

This message is for rsync developers who know the code very well. This is first time I am using rsync. In short trying to solve an problem by using existing rsync code. rsync does treewalk and it also does checksum on "logical file block", whose size can be choosen at will. I want to use this exisiting framework to write a utility to maintain a checksum tree of an dataset. Q. What do

is it possible and how difficult is it, to use LDAP for all the user accounts and groups and password management? would this be something you would want to do? or is it better to stick with samba's initila way of dealing with users? Caleb O'Connell caleb@lincoln.midcoast.com (207)882-7792

I noticed with rsync and compressed files or package files the transfer efficiency drops considerably. Eg. rsync an ISO image of a distribution will give you between 30% and 60% of the original transfer although from Beta1-Beta2 the change could not have been that great. The same thing happens with ZIP files for obvious reasons. My question or feature request if you want to call it is. Is it

Hello List, I´ve tried to switch from md5 checksum to md5lite within all my configuration to spare a few cpu cycles on my master, but it didn´t work at all :-( Then I´ve found out about bug #13199, but the bugs lists only 2.7x as affected. can anybody confirm this issue on 3.x? funny that the bug isn´t anywhere on the roadmap at all .... I´d suggest to remove mtime/md5lite from the

Hi, I am exploring extending Kyle Jones' patch (which implements post-transfer filter in receiver.c) to pre-filter or otherwise pre-process the file before it is sent. Kyle Jones patch can be found here <http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=b6f55s%24256q%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=6> and the rationale for what I am trying to do here

does anyone know howto set the softkeys of an Cisco 7960 running on an asterisk server via chan_sccp ? Mit besten Gr??en Dirk Rieger

has anyone an idea how to display incoming national/international isdn-pstn-calls correctly to internal isdn AND sccp/sip-phones ? without nationalprefix=0 and internationalprefix=00 I get incoming phone numbers correctly on isdn-phones but the leading zero's are stripped of for non-isdn phones when I set this prefixes inside zapata.conf my internal isdn-phones get this prefix twice...

Hello everybody, I have a problem with accessing class attributes. I think it might be due to namespace access restrictions or something similar, but I'm unable to figure it out, maybe someone knows the trick how to do it ... I'm trying to extract some information from the summary object for a model fitted using the lmer function from the lme4 package: smry <- summary(lmer(foo

Hello, I am the guy behind the ext2/ext3 patches for Extended Attributes and ACLs, and I've recently been asked about ACL support in rsync by Eric. Upon investigating I found that you have an ACL patch against rsync-2.5.5 [1]. I also found some other postings to rsync@lists.samba.org concerning rsync and ACLs [3]. Are there any plans for finalizing an integrating that rsync ACL patch? I

i''m in a team that is currently developing a web 2.0 application that really needs to scale in the very near future. we are using backgroundrb for some of the server tasks. currently, we have two servers (in RubyOnRails) that connects to a single backgroundrb daemon. is there a way that we can run multiple backgroundrb and have the servers do a round robin on them to retrieve a worker

Hi all, I''ve had a lot of fun over the last couple of days integrating Ferret with my Rails app. Many thanks to Dave Balmain for writing this. Everything seems to work well and my site now has full search capabilities. But I''m wondering how I can scale my site now? What would be the recommended approach in terms of sharing indexes across multiple servers? Is the