similar to: --one-file-system problem

Steve Sills Platnum Computers, President http://www.platnum.com steve@platnum.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Sills" <steve@platnum.com> To: "jw schultz" <jw@pegasys.ws> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:52 PM Subject: Re: Rsync's Speed > The source server is a Dual 800 Mhz /w a 7200 RPM 40 GB HDD, the dest server > is a P III 450 with a

I've been getting this error message for a few days from a customer's server and we can't seem to decipher it. I googled for it and only found references to it with respect to much older versions of rsync. We're running the Debian packaged version of rsync version 2.6.2-3. The customer side is running 2.6.3 compiled from source. #### inflate (token) returned -5 rsync error:

Just built 2.6.1 and started testing it. Nice job guys. I especially love the --progress and hardlink tweaks. Quite often, while I have systems backing up out of cron, I'd love to be able to see the --progress. Unfortunately, it's just not practical to crank up the verbosity like that on a regular basis (some of these systems have a few million files). A neat feature I'd like to see

Just got this from our nightly backup rsync: overflow: flags=0x6e l1=99 l2=1952984691 lastname=var/www/manual/mod/mod_php4/de/function.get-exte ERROR: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(238) Command exited with non-zero status 22 real 5.15 user 1.00 sys 0.88 Rsync version information: [root@gluon root]# rsync

Have the hard-links optimizations that were described here been implemented? http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-January/008137.html In any case, what's the general consensus behind using the --hard-links option on large (100GB and above) images? Does it still use a ton of memory? Or has that situation been alleviated? ..Chuck.. -- http://www.quantumlinux.com Quantum Linux

System is current Debian stable with rsync version: * rsync version 2.6.0 protocol version 27 * Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard links, symlinks, * batchfiles, IPv6, 64-bit system inums, 64-bit internal inums * * Modified for Debian to have --bwlimit-mod, a variation on the --bwlimit * algorithm. I have noticed that --link-dest only seems to work for me if I'm using an

I've never seen this one before. I'm using rsync 2.6.2 on both ends. Server (Athlon, 768MB RAM) checks out just fine. The only anomoly appears to be that this process has been running for 248268.43 seconds (this is not unexpected with this particular host we're backing up). Commandline: /usr/bin/time -p /usr/bin/rsync -e /usr/bin/ssh --archive --compress --sparse --stats

One of our servers is a CentOS 4 Linux/Samba filesharing server that serves an access database (via a mapped drive) to a client application running on Windows 98. Ever since we started rsync'ing it to back it up every night, it required samba to be restarted after the backup or the clients had trouble accessing the database. Recently though, the client application is complaining when

During my initial download for my home directory backup, it took rsync over 6 hours to do the initial backup, but I can FTP the stuff in about 30 Mins. Is Rsync usualy this slow? I have compression turned on, and its across a 100 MB/S network, Anyone had this problem before? Steve Sills

What I want to do is use rsync to back up a folder to an external drive. I would like to keep 30 days worth. For example: I have backups of June 1 - June 30. Once July 1 comes along, I want to keep June 2 - July 1 and delete June 1, and so forth. Any ideas how I can accomplish this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Rysnc-Schedule-tf4104577.html#a11672997 Sent from the

Hi all, I'm new to the rsync list. I've been searching for two days and have tried five different installs and so far none work the way I need them to. I have an "backup" server running rsync --version: rsync version 2.6.6 protocol version 29 Copyright (C) 1996-2005 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard

Hello, I am a new user of R, so I still have some basic difficulties. I'm trying to create a bar graph completely from reading a file. The idea was on the x axis have the columns of the table Married ,Single,Divorced, widower the legend Ages 18-34 35-45 46-64 65-69 70-74 the dataset dataset Ages Married Single Divorced widower 1 18-34 10.5 35.7 8.5 3.2 2 35-45

OK, I set up a new PC with a fresh XP load to be my rsync server. Rsync by itself seems to work fine (thank God. I'm going nuts.) I am still having problems when I throw ssh into the mix. At least now, things don't crash, but they do hang. The file list gets build, the transfer starts and it gets through maybe a few hundred files, but then everything stops. All the processes are still

Dear list, I am fitting a logistic multi-level regression model and need to test the difference between the ordinary logistic regression from a glm() fit and the mixed effects fit from glmer(), basically I want to do a likelihood ratio test between the two fits. The data are like this: My outcome is a (1,0) for health status, I have several (1,0) dummy variables RURAL, SMOKE, DRINK, EMPLOYED,

in a database table if there is a field which has a certain set of fixed values. for example staus => {Single, Married, Divorced } OR state => {California, Albama, Olaska ...} so what should be preferred way out of the following for storing the values 1. Keep the field as "string(Rails)" VARCHAR(MySQL) itself ....and while showing the field just show the field value. 2. Keep

Hi - there's a flag for rsync to compress the files in transit - is it possible to compress one side (target) with gzip and have rsync still work correctly? Any help would be appreciated. -- Ken

I have been a bit divorced from Samba for a while and am stumped by a recently seen issue. My Samba server (V4.8.3) is Centos 7 and the remote clients are windoze boxes at the other end of a VPN (OpenVPN). At some point in "recent" history, access to shares on the Centos server started to fail with password failures. The reason seems to be associated with user mapping. (See log fragment

Jason Kim <jasonwkim at google.com> writes: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Mark Lacey <641 at rudkx.com> wrote: > > Besides, the git-svn readonly bridge is a great solution for those who want to use git > >   It seems to be a reasonable solution for those individuals who > want to use git, but in my experience not for organizations that >

Is it practical to get a R/W file handle opened against an existing file on an unmounted ext2 filesystem? -- Chuck Wolber Electronic Flight Bag Crew Information Systems/ Linux Wonk 253.576.1154 "You can't connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards." --Steve Jobs

Hi, I'm trying to help a friend who is doing a thesis in a nurse college, to evaluate medical question forms. There are about 30 questions giving more than 110 parameters to describe each responding person's (gender, health etc.) and there are about 120 question forms to evaluate. I have basically 2 questions. 1. What to search for. 2. How to evaluate it statisticaly. As for No. 1. I have