similar to: [Bug 2240] Add last-match/short-circuit processing of include/exclude

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240 Summary: Add last-match/short-circuit processing of include/exclude Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All URL: http://cvs.openpkg.org/getfile/openpkg- src/rsync/rsync.patch.lastmatch OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2240 ------- Additional Comments From rse@engelschall.com 2005-01-13 07:48 ------- Created an attachment (id=887) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=887&action=view) rsync.patch.lastmatch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the

Is there any way to disable short-circuit evaluation of expressions in Clang/LLVM? Let's say I have C code like the following: bool validX = get_group_id(0) > 32; int globalIndexY0 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 0 + 1; bool valid0 = validX && globalIndexY0 >= 4 && globalIndexY0 < 3910; int globalIndexY1 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) +

10.10.2011, 18:29, "David A. Greene" <greened at obbligato.org>: > Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> writes: > >>  int globalIndexY2 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 2 + 1; >>  bool valid2       = validX && globalIndexY2 >= 4 && globalIndexY2 < 3910; >> >>  Clang, even at -O0, is performing

Justin Holewinski <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> writes: > int globalIndexY2 = get_group_id(1)*186 + 6*get_local_id(1) + 2 + 1; > bool valid2       = validX && globalIndexY2 >= 4 && globalIndexY2 < 3910; > > Clang, even at -O0, is performing short-circuit evaluation of these > expressions, resulting in a fair number of branch instructions being >

In function read_metadata_vorbiscomment_ from stream_decoder.c, at various locations where we short circuit the computation, we also set `obj->num_comments` accordingly. For example: https://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=blob;f=src/libFLAC/stream_decoder.c;h=e0f1b14d30dd548268a88e4341af3f38290816e3;hb=HEAD#l1736

We have an application that is storing an insane number of small files. We have run some tests with enabling geo-replication and letting it run but on our smallest data set it takes 10 days and our largest data set will likely take over 100 days. Would there be any way to take a copy of the data brick and convert that into a replicated image and then enable replication from the time of the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5199 Summary: Exclusion of source arg ancestor short-circuits recursion Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

On Wed, 4 May 2016 21:09:44 -0400 Kevin Korb <kmk at sanitarium.net> wrote: > That wording from the man page makes almost no sense without the > examples directly after it (and I have read it many times and know > what it is saying). Makes sense to me. The only thing I'd change is to use "in a depth first fasion" instead of "from the top down", "depth

I call the firm from my portable at home (zoiper softphone). I have internal extension 60, and I call the internal SIP-client 10 at the firm via an IAX-connection over internet. My colleague at phone 10 answers my call. I ask him to transfer me with my colleague at extension 50. He then presses "transfer" on the grandstream GXP2020 (I get music) and dials the number 50. Phone 50

I have release my routines for PRI circuit monitoring. You, your client or anyone can be notified by phone, beeper, email or txtmsg that your circuit is down. If Asterisk crashes due to an oscillating circuit (as I have found it sometimes does), sendmail is usually intact and email notification and txt messages will usually get through. If the client has backup lines, and Asterisk remains up,

Hi- Perhaps someone with an E100P in hand can answer this: I just received an E100P from Digium (I normally buy quad boards) I noticed that the circuit board says "T100P" on it, and I assume that the T100P and E100P both use the same circuit board. Can someone please confirm that their E100P says "T100P" on the artwork? Thanks Scott Scott M. Stingel Emerging Voice

Hello, we've had an Asterisk solution working for quite awhile. Today our IAX2 carrier started reporting circuit-busy to all calls for approximately an hour, which is different than a busy condition. I'm guessing that this indicates the carrier was having an outage, or was handling too many concurrent IAX2 calls. Is there a way to change our dialplan to fail to PSTN in case Dial(*)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5183 Summary: -r --include= --exclude= broken for version>=3.0.0pre5? Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

When Asterisk first starts up, it will attempt to "bring up" the B channels on any PRI circuits. If you are using A@H then you can log on to the Asterisk CLI (asterisk -r) and then do "stop now" to stop asterisk. Start up Asterisk again by typing asterisk -cvvv at the Linux command line. You should see a bunch of messages on the terminal and then you'll get the Asterisk

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5182 Summary: -r --include= --exclude= broken for version>=3.0.0pre5? Product: rsync Version: 3.0.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4764 Summary: Wrong include/exclude descriptions Product: rsync Version: 2.6.8 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: tps@vr-web.de QAContact:

Hi all, I inherited a cpu-stats script from the previous *nixadmin at our department. This script relies on a rsh-command to get the vmstats from the remote machines and then using a perl script to push it to a web server. Now I''ve just added a new machine running CentOS 5.2 x64 to the script and I get the error message in the subject line; "poll: protocol failure in circuit

Hi, I am attempting to make about ten calls simultaneously and intermittently get 'SIP/voipprovider is circuit-busy' followed by 'everyone is busy/congested at this time" I am not sure if this is related to my bandwidth to my voip provider, a configuration issue or something else. Has anyone seen this before and have any suggestions. Thanks in advance. --------------