similar to: [Bug 2094] Keep the last-sync time for better two-way synchronization

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[Bug 2094] Keep the last-sync time for better two-way synchronization"

2010 Jul 12
3
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2094] Keep the last-sync time for better two-way synchronization
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2094 matt at mattmccutchen.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |baya at rodovid.org ------- Comment #2 from matt at mattmccutchen.net 2010-07-12 15:02 CST ------- *** Bug 7565 has been marked
2007 Jul 14
1
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4531] symlinks updating doesn't work properly during updates
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4531 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Comment #3 from wayned@samba.org 2007-07-14 17:17 CST -------
2005 Nov 08
2
two way synchronization with rsync?
I have two offices in one city; employees work in both of them (once in office A, the next or an hour later in office B etc.). They would like to have the same profile (i.e., if they log off in office A, they would like to have their documents, Desktop, emails etc. in the profile in the office B when they arrive there an hour later). Is it possible with rsync to construct such a "two way
2004 Dec 27
2
bidirectional synchronization of dovecot-managed maildirs
Hello and happy holidays, I've been thinking about high performance bidirectional synchronizing the mail on my laptop (which is frequently disconnected) and my workstation at work (which is always on and receives all inbound mail). Both run dovecot on top of maildir. I've been playing with offlineimap, unison (which I already use for all my non-mail files), as well as the gnus agent (in
2015 Jun 15
1
OT: suggestion need on Sync in the windows way.
Does Unision support ACL? If it would than this part guide would work. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication But it didn't.... On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy < bob at donelsontrophy.net> wrote: > > > For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) > > --- > > ------------------------- >
2013 Feb 28
3
Best practice for sieve script synchronization
We consider deploying a two server active-active setup with dsync replication for ~2500 users. I was wondering how people handle sieve script synchronization in such setups. We came up with a few options for syncing: 1) rsync/unison ~/sieve every x seconds 2) move sieve dirs to separatate partition and sync with gluster or drbd 3) patch roundcube managesieve sieve plugin to upload
2015 Jun 15
0
OT: suggestion need on Sync in the windows way.
For bidirectional sync take a look at Unison (file synchronizer.) --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-06-15 01:04, Min Wai Chan wrote: > I agree, > If the synology uid and gid is working right than nfs would be great. it > would be easy... > However, it seem
2004 Feb 16
1
File synchronization friendly indexes
I've been doing some tests of file synchronization with Unison (think "two way rsync"), and run into one problem: Synching between servers has conflicts on the index file. I can manually exclude, but what seems to me to be a really wonderful feature would be to, preferably, make the indexes somewhat atomic, so that files, once written, don't change (this is a feature of maildirs
2017 Nov 22
2
Keeping idmap in sync cross DC
Hi Guys, I have run into a very interesting problem using GPO's on our DC's. As you may (or may not) know, we have migrated to a pure Samba4 (Git stable branch checkout) AD network. I can't be happier. *Kudos to the Samba team* We are running to DC's, DC1 and DC2, both full fledged DC's, both running CentOS 6.9, fully up to date. For the sysvol partition I decided to run a
2005 Nov 16
1
[Bug 3253] Feature request - Sync perms/ownership/time etc but with no file transfer
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3253 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX -------
2017 Nov 23
2
Keeping idmap in sync cross DC
On 22 November 2017 at 17:45, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:01:17 +0200 > Ian Coetzee via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > I have run into a very interesting problem using GPO's on our DC's. > > > > As you may (or may not) know, we have migrated to a pure Samba4 (Git >
2017 Nov 22
0
Keeping idmap in sync cross DC
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:01:17 +0200 Ian Coetzee via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I have run into a very interesting problem using GPO's on our DC's. > > As you may (or may not) know, we have migrated to a pure Samba4 (Git > stable branch checkout) AD network. I can't be happier. *Kudos to the > Samba team* > > We are running
2017 Nov 23
0
Keeping idmap in sync cross DC
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:01:03 +0200 Ian Coetzee via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 22 November 2017 at 17:45, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:01:17 +0200 > > Ian Coetzee via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > I have run into a very
2017 Nov 23
1
Keeping idmap in sync cross DC
On 23 November 2017 at 14:16, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:01:03 +0200 > Ian Coetzee via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 22 November 2017 at 17:45, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:01:17 +0200 > > > Ian Coetzee via samba <samba at
2015 Jun 16
0
using rsync to sync desktop /home/user of to laptop /home/user
----- "g" <geleem at bellsouth.net> escreveu: > De: "g" <geleem at bellsouth.net> > Para: centos at centos.org > Enviadas: Ter?a-feira, 16 de Junho de 2015 13:28:33 (GMT-0300) Auto-Detected > Assunto: [CentOS] using rsync to sync desktop /home/user of to laptop /home/user > > greetings, > > i want to sync my desktop home directory to my
2015 Jun 22
0
Bi-directional sync for Sysvol folder -- Osync?
Hai Min Wai Chan, ? I have tested it as shown in your example, and your correct. I?did a few test, but im very buzy atm. Few things i noticed. ? ? I?compaired the rights in linux and these are the same, but when i look at the rights in windows, these are different.. :-/ but wait.. Sync DC1 => DC2 , files and folder rights are ok, in windows and in linux Sync DC2 => DC1, files and
2015 Jun 24
0
Bi-directional sync for Sysvol folder -- Osync?
Hello, Just to share I've updated the guide to use osync. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication Enjoy Regards, Min Wai On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Belle, > > That produce the similar situation. > > Thus I'm trying osync > > And the result are much present according to my test
2007 Sep 05
0
(no subject)
thank you very much for you all. I will try your suggestion ,thx. =20 Best Regards --------------------------------------------- yhhuang =BB=C6=D3=C2=BB=D4 Server Dept. TeleNav Shanghai Inc. Tel:(21)6337 2220 ext 8651 www.telenav.com -----=D3=CA=BC=FE=D4=AD=BC=FE----- =B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: Wayne Davison [mailto:wayned@samba.org]=20 =B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2006=C4=EA3=D4=C26=C8=D5 23:46
2014 Aug 21
1
Proper sysvol replication solution...
I see the Samba guide suggests using rsync to keep sysvols in sync, but this poses a problem with ID's and it is only one-way. I have been hesitant to suggest anything because of the flak I have been getting, but I do believe I have a much better solution that transfers files via SSH, is bi-directional (no more only editing group policy on one server), and does NOT set UID/GID
2005 Dec 05
4
Keeping data on 2 servers in sync !
I want to build 2 servers (both running samba) to provide file storage to 2 offices (approx 100 miles apart, linked via DSL) but all data writen to 1 server must also be saved to the other server. Both servers would also allow users to access the data via a VPN thus allowing 1 office with a failed server to access the other server via the vpn and still see the data from both offices. I currently