similar to: [Bug 1412] Bogus warnings with --backup --backup-dir=/path

I wrote a script that uses rsync a bit and wanted to use it. While testing was fine, the real life was more complicated :) Basically, my rsync command looks like that: rsync -v -azu -b --backup-dir /var/backup/files/ /var/profiles/files/ username@host:/ When I execute it where both machines have rsync 2.6.3, everything runs fine. When I execute it on a machine with rsync 2.6.6, and the remote

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1646 Summary: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: ard@waikato.ac.nz

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2455 Summary: rsync --daemon segfaults if "log file = <file>" dir does not exist Product: rsync Version: 2.6.3 Platform: Sparc OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:

SSH, like RSH before it, invokes a command using the user's shell as specified in the passwd file. In a mixed shell environment with some logins csh-like and some sh-like that is sometimes very difficult to handle. (No, I am not fond of csh.) If I could force a single shell everywhere of course that would be preferable but sometimes I have no control over it. I have often wanted an option

On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 22:55 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > Here is a patch that I believe should fix the problem. I will also > > attach it so that there won't be any mailer problems with the > > transport of it. > > And I broke it in the editing of it. Drat! > > > + bridge=$(brctl show | | awk 'NR==2{print$1}') > >

Bob Proulx wrote: > Here is a patch that I believe should fix the problem. I will also > attach it so that there won't be any mailer problems with the > transport of it. And I broke it in the editing of it. Drat! > + bridge=$(brctl show | | awk 'NR==2{print$1}') Which is obviously incorrect. Here is a hopefully correct patch. With only one pipe in the pipeline. ---

So, my use case is : 1. lot of connections over dial-up lines 2. need to transfer safely A SINGLE BZIPPED FILE to the server 3. if dial-up line fails, it's automatically restarted after 5 minutes and transfer start again I heard about the --partial option in order to keep the partial transferred file. I thought that rsync will apply his incremental check and update alghoritm on that

Hello, I've just begun a new job and have inherited a Samba server that I'm VERY MUCH not familiar with. Using the instructions I was left, I am attempting to add a new student: login as: root root@10.0.0.160's password: Last login: Tue Sep 6 08:57:37 2005 from 10.0.12.18 [root@localhost ~]# cd /opt/IDEALX/sbin [root@localhost sbin]# ./smbldap-useradd cbutts2011 [root@localhost

Why does using --delete -b --backup-dir relative/path puts the deleted files in the target folder, while using the full path works as expected? my experimentation... root@feral:/tmp/test (0)>uname -a Linux feral 2.4.22-1.2115.nptlsmp #1 SMP Wed Oct 29 15:30:09 EST 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux root@feral:/tmp/test (0)>rsync --version rsync version 2.5.6 protocol version 26

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412 Bug ID: 1412 Summary: ip6tables-nft not accepting "icmp" as shorthand for "icmpv6" Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1412 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1412.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: fff0dd32f665f2b79fa4ebeeb6ae7a11b301a6c834e0fbb36df4e9c1df1d1445 squid-3.1.23-16.el6_8.5.i686.rpm x86_64:

I have been delving into how to get this HP NC4010 to suspend. I think the practice of just closing the unit for 15+ min inside my backpack as I move to the next meeting is what cooked my drive... So it seems that Debian users have been successful with APM: http://www.proulx.com/~bob/nc4000/ and http://www.gag.com/~bdale/nc4000/ So my Centos related questions are: I need to turn acpi=off

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 08:09:59PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: >The behavior of the upstream GNU cut has changed. It is no longer >allows the usage of cutting lines as fields by setting a newline as >the delimiter. This has broken /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge which uses >it in this way. > >This was originally reported by Volker Klasen against the coreutils >package. However

Bob Proulx wrote: >> The error shown with "ssh -Xvvv" in all failure cases is, >> debug3: send packet: type 91 >> debug2: X11 auth data does not match fake data. >> X11 connection rejected because of wrong authentication. >> debug2: X11 rejected 1 i0/o0 >I don't know but I do have questions. So maybe... What is the output >of these

Hello, I am using rsync v2.5.6 to backup our entire server filesystem over the network to a central backup server. I have copied the example script from the rsync website (http://rsync.samba.org/examples.html) to create incremental backups, the --backup-dir seems to have a strange side-effect. Everything goes well, but on the server side where the backup is stored I can't seem to break out

take a look at rsnapshot http://www.rsnapshot.org/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Blake Carver [mailto:lists@lisnews.com] > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 7:35 AM > To: rsync@lists.samba.org > Subject: Question on --backup --backup-dir Switches For Incremental > Backs > > > I current do some rsync backups with a command like so every day > > rsync -az

Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible to get filters purely for the two backup flags. They would work in a similar manner to the current ones except that they would only work on files to be backed up in order to indicate what should be included in the backup and what should be excluded. This came up for me as part of daily server backups where I use --backup-dir to have, effectively, daily

Hi All, I think I am missing something with the backup-dir-dels.diff patch. How does that differ from the original --backup -backup-dir=DIR option? Using the original one works fine (on patched or non-patched rsync), putting deleted source files into the DIR on destination, but when I run --backup -backup-dir-dels=DIR, nothing happens to the deleted files. Rob D

I current do some rsync backups with a command like so every day rsync -az -e ssh --stats --delete --exclude "stuff" / user@server:/home/user/ What I want to do is have some incremental backups in there in subdirectories. So, for example, something like this on the remote server /home/user/something.tuesday /home/user/something.friday I thought the --backup --backup-dir Switches were

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4834 Summary: --inplace with --backup --backup-dir does not work Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: joost@seat-ibiza.nl