similar to: man page: -u: mention when the dates are the same

Can't join the list confirming via email. Will get: gabe.freedesktop.org[131.252.210.177] said: 550 5.1.1 <nouveau-request at lists.freedesktop.org>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command) Can only join via the http confirmation link.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3660 Bug ID: 3660 Summary: Prevent disastrous unintended local copying Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: scp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1037 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #925| |ok? Flag| | ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 08:23:04AM -0700, angystardust wrote: > Hi Richard, > > i'm glad to see the suggestion i gave to the RH support in the > official documentation! :smile: > > You can also point to a vCenter by using this syntax: > > `ovftool --noSSLVerify vi://[USER]:[PASSWORD]@[VCENTER-HOST]/[DATACENTER-NAME]/vm/[VM-NAME] /path/to/file.ova` > > For an

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1037 Summary: Man page for -L and -R should mention -g Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.0p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: Documentation AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

Full_Name: Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo Version: 2.6.1 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (213.140.16.187) In 'outer' man page, there is no mention of the Vectorize function. Moreover, I think it isn't underlined enough that the FUN argument to 'outer' must be a vectorized function (doc speaks about a function which has to 'operate elementwise'). A cross-reference from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13587 Bug ID: 13587 Summary: Add a --dry-run way to show destination for each item Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org

# lspci | grep ' VGA ' | cut -d" " -f 1 | xargs -i lspci -v -s {} 00:05.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation C51G [GeForce 6100] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Flags: bus master, 66MHz, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 16, NUMA node 0 Memory at fc000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M] Memory at d0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable)

>>>>> "IM" == Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> writes: IM> OK, well 18.1.0 is completely busted for those GPU's. Either upgrade IM> or downgrade. But don't use that release. I did [DOWNGRADE] libglapi-mesa:amd64 18.1.0-1 -> 18.0.5-1 [DOWNGRADE] libglx-mesa0:amd64 18.1.0-1 -> 18.0.5-1 and rebooted. Problem remains: $ glxinfo > /dev/null

chromium prints thousands of [1886:1886:0619/220640.036283:ERROR:gl_surface_presentation_helper.cc(115)] GetVSyncParametersIfAvailable() failed!

glxgears, chromium etc. run fine. The problems is these error messages, $ glxinfo > /dev/null libGL error: failed to create dri screen libGL error: failed to load driver: nouveau How can I make them go away? I tried everything. P.S., also /var/log/Xorg.0.log [ 37.195] (EE) AIGLX error: Calling driver entry point failed

What the maximum filesize rsync can transfer? I'm trying to rsync one of my servers to another but the rsync is croaking on a file that's barely 1GB. Tips, hints, suggestions? rsync server is AIX 4.3.3 ML11 - rsync 2.6.3 rsync client is AIX 5.3 ML1 - rsync 2.6.4 Thanks -Jeff -- Jeff Schoby Unix/Network Admin City of Columbia, Missouri 573.874.6320

On Mon 07 Apr 2008, S.A. Birl wrote: > > Server is running rsync 2.6.1 on RH > Client is running rsync 2.6.3 on Cygwin (Win2003) > > When I connect client to server, I get kicked out after SSH > authentication. I can manually ssh into the server with no problems. Is the server running an rsync daemon? If so, why the ssh? Paul Slootman

Hi all, I upgrade my rsync from 2.3.1 to 2.6.6 today in the client host, everything seems not working after the migration. I didn't touch the rsync server. Herewith is the log from my rsync server. I looks like something related to IPV6, anyone has any idea? Rsync Server : RHEL4 with rsync 2.6.3 deamon running Rsync Client (merlin) : Solaris 8 with rsync 2.6.6 2006/05/09 16:18:40 [5332]

Nah, this is the first time I've posted here in years. Gennaly things just tick over with the application moving along in a nice straightforward manner, improvment upon improvement. Rsync is one of the mose important and usefu apps available for Linux and OS X (powered by APPLE!!!!); followed by ffmpeg and vlc (and Apache, I guess, but I don't do much of that anymore). The docs are very

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14407 Bug ID: 14407 Summary: link_stat ... failed: No such file or directory: should mention which end of the connection it is talking about Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal

Thanks Jim for looking into that, I was really starting to wonder what was going on. Let me know if you find a way to tell the compiler to stop complaining. Jean-Marc Jim Crichton a ?crit : > I looked back at my old C55 EC build, and I had the same warning in > mdf.c which Mike found. The assembly code did have a valid shift, and > this build did cancel echo. > > When I built

Like nifteaux (nifto) man, all I did was change the sleep time and I get different results: $ touch u; sleep 0;touch v; chmod 0 v; rsync u v; ls -og u v; /bin/rm -f u v -rw-r--r-- 1 0 2005-04-25 00:05 u ---------- 1 0 2005-04-25 00:05 v $ touch u; sleep 1;touch v; chmod 0 v; rsync u v; ls -og u v; /bin/rm -f u v -rw-r--r-- 1 0 2005-04-25 00:05 u -rw-r--r-- 1 0 2005-04-25 00:05 v OK, never

On Fri 24 Jun 2016, Kevin Korb wrote: > Again, --partial only means don't delete the incomplete file if rsync is > aborted. Normally rsync will delete the incomplete file so you don't > have bogus files laying around. > > When you rsync to or from a network mount to rsync that is a local copy. > To use rsync over the network either your source or your target would

My impression when running with --bwlimit in combination with compression -z is that the speed to the filesystem is limited to the value given in --bwlimit. This must be contrary to the intention with --bwlimit. David