similar to: Environment variable question

Hi, I want to share a partition of an external disk between 3 machines. It is located on a Sun StoreTek 3510 and bound (via multipathing) to all 3 machines. One machine (say mach1) is the node I used to create the filesystem and setup /etc/ocfs2/cluster.conf. I copied the file to the other 2 machines. All use the same /etc/multipath.conf[1], too. All start /etc/init.d/ocfs2 at boot, all are

I am hoping I can get a little light she on a problem I am having trying to bring up a guest domain. I suspect that the problem is in my supplied file system First the environment. VT enabled dual core EM64T processor, Asus Mb (I can get the exact chipset infor if relevant) 2 Gig of DRAM SATA drives. I have build and booted the domain 0 using 3.0.2-2 version of xen. This seems ok.

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Raja Venkateswaran <rajav at codeaurora.org> wrote: > I think we need a group of maintainers rather than a single maintainer given > the spectrum of ARM targets/ISAs/platforms required to support There have been a plethora of ARM Instruction Set Architecture variants over the years. Which ones do we expect LLVM to support right now, and which as-yet

*Dear R community* * * *I have two questions on data subsample manipulation. I am starting to use R again after a long brake and feel a bit rusty.* * * *I want to select a subsample of data for males and females separately* * * library(foreign) Datatemp <- read.spss("H:/Skjol/Data/HL/t1and2b.sav", use.value.labels = F) > table(Datatemp$sex) 1 2 3049 3702

I think we need a group of maintainers rather than a single maintainer given the spectrum of ARM targets/ISAs/platforms required to support and the amount of people/system resources required. I & my team plan to actively participate in the bug-fixing process during the release cycle. If we can divide the bugs among the maintainers and establish a requirement that all open ARM bugs must be

I just connected an Asterisk server to an Avaya Pbx using the instructions at: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk +Avaya Everything seems to be working as I can send and receive calls. The only detail I am having a problem with is that when an extension on the Avaya calls an Asterisk extension, I only get the name part of the CID, not the number. From Asterisk to the Avaya

I'm the code owner of LLVM codegen and targets. I'm also the one of main developers on the original ARM target. That means, I would make the decisions on major development on ARM target if there are decisions to be made. But my role is very different from what people are looking for in this thread. To properly qualify a target like ARM which are supported on many different CPUs and

Each row of my data frame is assigned to a class (eg country). Can you suggest how I break apart the data frame so that I create new data frames for each class eg If Class = "US" put in new dataframe dataUS Thanks in advance for your help Chris

Testing on arm-darwin outside of Apple is _complicated_. I had it partially working about two years ago. The general approach is to use rsh/ssh to remotely execute each test on the target, which outside of Apple requires jailbreaking. In the old test system, setting up REMOTE_CLIENT=ssh, REMOTE_PORT, etc. would automatically use ssh to run the tests. In lit, it looks like TestRunner.py has

Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which

I see, so perhaps the LLVM ARM Backend is in need of a method of organizing volunteer qualifiers, as releases near? Has this generally been organized via this mailing list? Joe Joe Abbey Software Architect Arxan Technologies, Inc. 1305 Cumberland Ave, Ste 215 West Lafayette, IN 47906 W: 765-889-4756 x2 C: 765-464-9893 jabbey at arxan.com<mailto:jabbey at arxan.com>

On Oct 13, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Raja Venkateswaran wrote: > I think we need a group of maintainers rather than a single maintainer given the spectrum of ARM targets/ISAs/platforms required to support and the amount of people/system resources required. I & my team plan to actively participate in the bug-fixing process during the release cycle. If we can divide the bugs among the maintainers

I think we need to think along two dimensions - Breadth of testing and depth of testing 1. Breadth: What the best supported ARM ISA versions in LLVM ARM? Say its armv6 and armv7; We need to - regression test ARM mode, Thumb-2 and Thumb-1 mode (armv6) - Performance/code-size test ARM mode, Thumb-2 and Thumb-1 modes We need to agree on an optimization level for regression as well as

I am very interested in seeing a qualification plan for ARM given that it is a widely used target with several combinations of options/modes to be tested. I & my team use ARM hardware for running tests and we run all LLVM test suite tests as part of qualification process. I had started a similar conversation in llvm-commits, but this is probably the right forum. It will save everyone a lot of

I am very interested in seeing a qualification plan for ARM given that it is a widely used target with several combinations of options/modes to be tested. I & my team use ARM hardware for running tests and we run all test LLVM test suite tests as part of qualification process. I had started a similar conversation in llvm-commits, but this is probably the right forum. It will save everyone a

Issue IX - 28 September 2006 We are proud to announce the release of LDTP 0.6.0. This release features number of important breakthroughs in LDTP as well as in the field of Test Automation. This release note covers a brief introduction on LDTP followed by the list of new features and major bug fixes which makes this new version of LDTP the best of the breed. Useful references have been included at

"Raja Venkateswaran" <rajav at codeaurora.org> writes: > I think we need to think along two dimensions - Breadth of testing and depth > of testing > > 1. Breadth: What the best supported ARM ISA versions in LLVM ARM? Say its > armv6 and armv7; We need to > - regression test ARM mode, Thumb-2 and Thumb-1 mode (armv6) > - Performance/code-size test ARM mode,

Issue VIII - 10 August 2006 We are provide to announce the release of LDTP 0.5.0. This release features number of important breakthroughs in the history of LDTP as well as in the field of Test Automation. This release note covers a brief introduction on LDTP followed by the list of new features and major bug fixes which makes this new version of LDTP the best of the breed. Useful references have

Hi, It goes without saying that I +1 this. Cheers, James -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Raja Venkateswaran Sent: 11 October 2011 17:46 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer I am very interested in seeing a qualification plan for ARM given that it is a widely used

i'll guess the solution to my problem will be something simple and obvious, because i know i ain't the first person to do this and it ain't all that complicated, but i've been staring at it for days and can't see what's wrong. new installation; os x snow leopard server; postfix 2.5.5; dovecot 1.1.17apple0.5 i'm trying to get SMTP auth working via SASL. using a