similar to: more filelist --stats

Hello, I have written a little script that's would email me all errors. rsync -vah --delete --stats <sources> <destination> > /var/log/sauvegarde/listoffile.log 2> /var/log/sauvegarde/errors.log My problem is i want to have the stats in my mail. Is it possible to redirect --stats to STDERR. I have tryed to do this : /---

As those of you who watch CVS will be aware Wayne has been making progress in reducing memory requirements of rsync. Much of what he has done has been the product of discussions between he and myself that started a month ago with John Van Essen. Most recently Wayne has changed how the file_struct and its associated data are allocated, eliminating the string areas. Most of these changes have been

3.1, including the latest version, produces bogus ---stats output: % rsync -r --stats . > /tmp/3.1-n % tail -n 17 /tmp/3.1-n Number of files: 3,159 (reg: 2,984, dir: 173, link: 2) Number of created files: 0 Number of deleted files: 0 Number of regular files transferred: 0 Total file size: -6,417,895,484,864,819,269 bytes ************************************************* Total transferred file

A recent posting here got me thinking about having the --progress output tell the user about how many files were left to go in the transfer. I submit the attached patch which outputs an extra suffix onto the progress line at the end of each file's transfer (so it only appears once per file, not on every status update). The output would look like this: [...] flist.c 35671 100%

Since the heap statistics were added, I have viewed thousands of rsync reports (with --verbose and --stats), and not once have I had a need for them. So for me, they're just noise. Here is a 3-part patch to v2.5.6 that treats --stats in a similar fashion to --verbose in that additional --stats will get you more statistics. For this initial case, there's only one additional level of

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 06:03:10PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Dave Dykstra (dwd@bell-labs.com) said: > > I stumbled across the bug report > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58878 > > > > which shows that you made a bug fix to rsync on Sunday. What exactly did > > you do? > > Attached. It's the same thing as yours, I just

Hi, I've noticed every time someone does an rsync-request on my ftp-site (which also provides rsync as mirror method), rsyncd creates a filelist. This is a quite IO and CPU intensive procedure, especially for things mirrors like FreeBSD with lots of little files. I was wondering... is there a way to cache that filelist? Our mirrors are updated once, or twice a day, it could speed up

Hi, I want to make rsync compare a local filesystem with a previously generated file containing the required informations about each file von the remote filesystem. a) Is this possible? b) How can I generate the required filelist? Thx, Daniel -- ************************************************* * Daniel Jung * Daniel.Jung@dj-web.de * * Linux-User: #118180 * http://www.dj-web.de

Hi all I am still busy with my copy of the /var/spool/mail direcroty I gave it this command [root@ais-mail01 root]# time rsync -pogrve ssh /var/spool/mail root@10.0.0.9:/var/spool/mail/ root@10.0.0.9's password: building file list ... As top shows me it has been going 85 mins now building the filelist I recon there are about 80 000 files in that directory totaling 50Gig I was wondering is

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11152 Bug ID: 11152 Summary: Feature Request: Cache Filelist Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at samba.org Reporter: andrebruce at

hello, apparently,? rsync sorts the list of files? provided to "--files-from". how can i avoid sorting of that list ? I want to copy a list of files in specific order regards Roland

>> I want to copy a list of files in specific order > Why ? because i want to serialize files on disk so they are stored on disk in the order being accessed regularly i built that list for --files-from?? via output from fatrace tool. i now did use tar to transfer the files i will add an RFE to bugzilla thanks roland Am 31.12.23 um 20:56 schrieb Francis.Montagnac at inria.fr: >

I announced the release of 2.6.3pre1 on the rsync-announce mailing list back on the 12th. I was thinking at the time that this email would get seen by those on the regular rsync list, but I forgot that this is not how the rsync lists are setup. For those that missed it, here is the text of the announcement: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I have

I have found a nasty bug when a file, which is in some of many sources, shall be copied to a target. The linux-Version works well but rsync 2.5.{2|5|6} under solaris9 (gcc 2.95.3) and darwin (gcc 3.1) do not. The decision which file (out of which src) shall be copied depends on the number of src dirs given on the command line. This bug bytes us very hard, because we decided to rely on rsync

HI all, efficiency question for VERY low bandwith networks Suppose I know the list of files that are changed What is the most efficient way to make rsync sync this list. Currently I use --include-from --exclude to generate a 'filelist' but I suspect that client and/or server exchange the list of files in the module to be synced. this traffic can be avoided since the include-from

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3491 Summary: throttle disk IO during filelist/directory parsing Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All URL: http://vilius.multiply.com/video/item/10 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core

Hello Rsync PRO?s, i?m satisfied with the rsync features...never seen a better replication tool....!! ;-) But i have some problems...:-( OK, here me installation: - one Compac Proliant ML370 with cached SCSI HDDs and 1,2GHz and 1gb RAM... on this machine we have the Rsync deamon runnig to export the data we want to replicate - now we have 68 other NAS machines in our branch offices and this NAS

Hi, As a gentoo-user i frequently run the emerge sync command, which in turn does a rsync with the mainserver. The 'problem' is that the portage directory tree contains about 19.000 directories and 96.000 files. So building the filelist takes a pretty long time, because of the many disk accesses that are neccesary. On the server side the disk-io problem is probably less worse since

I have released rsync 2.6.3pre2 -- the second (and final) pre-release version of 2.6.3. Please help out with the testing so that the code gets a good workout before 2.6.3 is released. (Note that this version will not be in testing for as long as 2.6.3pre1 was -- I'd like to get it released in a week or two, if possible.) To see what has changed since 2.6.2, read this text file:

I have released rsync 2.6.3pre2 -- the second (and final) pre-release version of 2.6.3. Please help out with the testing so that the code gets a good workout before 2.6.3 is released. (Note that this version will not be in testing for as long as 2.6.3pre1 was -- I'd like to get it released in a week or two, if possible.) To see what has changed since 2.6.2, read this text file: