similar to: rsync process never quits!

OK, I think this is an RSYNC bug! When I start a single rsync process on the source machine, everything works fine: on the destination machine the listening daemon exits after the operation completes. When I start more than one rsync process on the source machine, here is what happens: * on some of the destination machines not just one rsync daemon, but two rsync.exe processes become running

Hello, I have a one-way audio problem. If any one can give me a clue on how to solve it, I'd highly appreciate. My configuration is: Both Asterisk server and a SIP phone run within a LAN. Asterisk: CVS-HEAD-06/27/04-11:42:23. SIP phone is X-Lite release 1103m build stamp 14262. The Linux box that running Asterisk server is RedHat 2.4.18-14. Asterisk server runs on IP: 192.168.1.102. X-Lite

Here are what i am going to accomplish: I have 400 files named as xxx.txt. the content of the file looks like the following: name count 1. aaa 100 2. bbb 2000 3. ccc 300 4. ddd 3000 ........ more that 1000 rows in each files. these are the areas i need help: 1. how can i only read in the files with the string patterns ggg or fff as part of the file names? for instance, I

I am seeing an issue with getting certain sip devices to be recognized as defined SIP clients host= in the sip.conf and the only deference that I can find btw sources that work and don't work is that devices that send packets with an Initial Via header of themselves appears to work and pick the context correctly but those that don't have the Via just get dropped in the context of the

Here are what i am going to accomplish: I have 400 files named as xxx.txt. the content of the file looks like the following: name count 1. aaa 100 2. bbb 2000 3. ccc 300 4. ddd 3000 ........ more that 1000 rows in each files. these are the areas i need help: 1. how can i only read in the files with the string patterns ggg or fff as part of the file names? for

Hello, I would like to plot the following xyplot : for each date of fff (1 date per panel), bbb=f(aaa) for the two groups (ddd=1 and ddd=2) superimposed. I can do it by group (see below) but not together. I looked at http://lmdvr.r-forge.r-project.org/figures/figures.html but I haven't found what I was looking for (to be honest, I haven't understood all the examples). Any help will be

On 14/06/2017 5:58 AM, Andreas Kersting wrote: > Hi, > > I would really like to have a way to split long string literals across > multiple lines in R. I don't understand why you require the string to be a literal. Why not construct the long string in an expression like paste0("aaa", "bbb") ? Surely the execution time of the paste0 call is

On 14/06/2017 6:45 AM, Andreas Kersting wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 06:12:09 -0500, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 14/06/2017 5:58 AM, Andreas Kersting wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would really like to have a way to split long string literals across >>> multiple lines in R. >> >> I don't understand why

Having some line-breaking character for string literals would have benefits as string literals can then be constructed parse-time rather than run-time. I have run into this myself a few times as well. One way to at least emulate something like that is the following. `%+%` <- function(x,y) paste0(x,y) "hello" %+% " pretty" %+% " world" -Mark Op wo 14 jun.

As I recall this has been discussed at least a few times (unfortunately I'm traveling so can't check the references), but the justification was never satisfactory. Personally, I wouldn't mind string continuation supported since it makes for more readable code (I had one of my packages raise a NOTE in examples because there is no way in R to split a long hash into multiple lines), but

If you are changing the parser (which is a major change) you might consider treating strings in the C/C++ way: char *s = "A" "B"; means the same as char *s = "AB"; I am not a big fan of that syntax but it is widely used. A backslash at the end of the line leads to errors when you accidently put a space after the backslash and the editor

Dear R-help, Here's a simple example of nonlinear curve fitting where nls seems to get the answer wrong on a very simple exponential fit (my R version 2.7.2). Look at this code below for a very basic curve fit using nls to fit to (a) a logarithmic and (b) an exponential curve. I did the fits using self-start functions and I compared the results with a more simple fit using a straight lm()

After a lot of processing I get a matrix into M. I expected each row and column to be a vector. But it is a list. R-Inferno says... "Arrays (including matrices) can be subscripted with a matrix of positive numbers. The subscripting matrix has as many columns as there are dimensions in the array—so two columns for a matrix. The result is a vector (not an array) containing the selected

Suppose, 'fr' is data.frame with columns 'Y', 'A' and 'B'. 'A' has levels 'Aa' 'Ab' and 'Ac', and 'B' has levels 'Ba', 'Bb', 'Bc' and 'Bd'. 'Y' columns are numbers. I tried the following three sets of commands. I understand that A*B is equivalent to A+B+A:B. However, A:B in A+B+A:B is

> -----Original Message----- > From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Michael > Fox > Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 11:53 AM > To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> > Subject: shared/public mailbox application > > I'm new to Dovecot and I need help configuring a shared or public > mailbox - > I'm not sure

Apologies if this is a repeat: I trawled through the archives and couldn't find a reasonable answer, so I'm asking here. I have an Asterisk install connecting from behind a NAT device (DSL modem) to a SIP proxy (in my case, Broadvoice). I have an sjphone softphone on a Windows PC also behind the NAT device that connects to the Asterisk install, and using this setup I've been pretty

On Wed, 14 Jun 2017, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: > I don't think it is reasonable to change the parser this way. This is > currently valid R code: > > a <- "foo" > "bar" > > and with the new syntax, it is also valid, but with a different > meaning. Or you can even consider > > a <- "foo" > bar %>% func() %>% print() > >

I don't think it is reasonable to change the parser this way. This is currently valid R code: a <- "foo" "bar" and with the new syntax, it is also valid, but with a different meaning. Or you can even consider a <- "foo" bar %>% func() %>% print() etc. I like the idea of string literals, but the C/C++ way clearly does not work. The Python/Julia way

I have a to a samba server (4.4.16) on built on Solaris 11 samba pkg. It is a member of an Active directory domain. Users, for some time, have been experiencing long (20 -40 second) delays when browsing to, opening and writing a network share on the server. Attempts to do any of those results in a dialogue box being displayed showing: Contacting server: \\<server-name> \share

Dear R helpers, Suppose I have following data.frame. df <- data.frame(category = c("treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_A", "treat_B", "treat_B", "treat_B", "treat_B", "treat_B", "treat_B",