similar to: Problem related to time-stamp

I'm running RedHat 8.0 with samba-2.2.7-5.8.0 (installed from RedHat distribution) When I use cpio to write a backup (> 2GB) to a smbfs filesystem, I get the error: File size limit exceeded I get the same error when I linux copy (cp) a file (> 2GB) from a Linux ext3 filesystem to the smbfs filesystem. The smbfs filesystem is mounted from a Windows 2000 Professional workstation. After

We have been using ZFS for user home directories for a good while now. When we discovered the problem with full filesystems not allowing deletes over NFS, we became very anxious to fix this; our users fill their quotas on a fairly regular basis, so it''s important that they have a simple recourse to fix this (e.g., rm). I played around with this on my OpenSolaris box at home, read around

Helle everyone, Let's say we have 3 servers, 2 of them have the latest (stable) version of rsyncd running (2.6.9) <Server1> ==> I N T E R N E T ==> <Server2 (rsyncd running)> ==> LAN ==> <Server3 (rsyncd running)> Suppose I want to send a big file (bigfile.big) from Server1 to both Server2 and Server3. It would be a good idea to send first from Server1

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1558 Summary: Sftp client does not correctly process server response messages after write error Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sftp

--delete --force Won't Remove Directories With Dotnames rsync 2.6.9 Me, personally, I reckon this to be an irritant ... but perhaps (and having thought about this a bit I decided it's a good chance) this is an intentional and useful behaviour. But it's a nuisance if you call your --partial-dir .partial, as I happen to do, since now if you remove a directory which was aborted in

Hi everybody, the following alway gives me the error "Fehler in if (File$X.Frame.Number[a] + 1 == File$X.Frame.Number[a + 1]) (File$FishNr[a] <- File$FishNr[a - : Fehlender Wert, wo TRUE/FALSE n?tig ist". Maybe its stupid, but i'm not getting why... Maybe someone can help me. Thanks a lot! for (i in unique(BigFile$TrackAll)) { File <-

I want to use --min-size to copy just large files (and their necessary parent directories), but everything I've tried copies *all* the source directories, and creates them empty on the destination even if they don't have any big files in them. I only want the minimal directory hierarchies that contain the big files. This doesn't work: $ rm -rf /tmp/foo $ rsync -ai --min-size

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > Again, no machine on the internal network that my 2 CentOS hosts are > on are connected to the internet. I have no way to download anything., > There is an onerous and protracted process to get files into the > internal network and I will see if I can get netperf in. Right, but do you have

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10336 Summary: Time in file listing with --list-only option is inconsistent whether dst is given or not Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8512 Summary: rsync -a slower than cp -a Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: linux.news at bucksch.org QAContact:

I have a quick question about rsync's writing of files. I have a team of people that all use the host BigServer, which is running rsync as a deamon, as a central place to keep all shared files backed up. The "master copy" for any given file is considered to be the local file that somebody has worked on -- i.e., BigServer is NOT considered the master copy. BigServer is the backup

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:03 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Matt Garman <matthew.garman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Again, no machine on the internal network that my 2 CentOS hosts are >>> on are connected to the

Dear OpenSSH developers, OpenSSH setting non-blocking mode on its standard files creates serious problems. Setting non-blocking mode violates many of the semantics of how files are supposed to behave and most programs (and most, if not all, stdio libraries) are not prepared to deal with it. That wouldn't be a problem except that non-blocking mode is not a property of the file descriptor but

[sorry if this isn't threaded right... I just subscribed] Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > There are two reasons for the reserve. One is to reserve space on the > partition containing /var and /etc for log files, etc. The other is > to avoid the performance degredation when the last 5-10% of the disk > space is used. (BSD actually reserves 10% by default.) Given that > the

Hi there, I'm using RH7.2 (with the 2.4.9-30 kernal and it's required components) as a base for a server system running kernel 2.4.18. I've gone to this version to get around non-performing aic7xxx drivers in the stock 7.2 kernels, and updated gigabit ethernet drivers. I have a raid unit (Medea) attached to an Adaptec 3916, coming up as sdb. It has 2kb blocks, but the fault

My application uses Ferret to search through the database records on the system. The problem is that there is some bug in my application which I have not been able to fix. What it actually does is that it returns the records on its own sweet will. I mean, it gives me results for some records and for some it doesn''t. I have done things like dropped the database and created it again,

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Matt Garman <matthew.garman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: >> Again, no machine on the internal network that my 2 CentOS hosts are >> on are connected to the internet. I have no way to download anything., >> There is an onerous and protracted process to get

did you (or someone else with root access) possibly delete a very large file in /var that may still have been in use? it's very annoying but if you do a rm on a large file under /var that is still open by some process for writing, it won't actually clear the space. you can overcome that by just truncating the file instead of doing an rm (e.g. either > /var/log/bigfile or cp

Hi everyone, This is a strange problem I have been having. I'm not sure where the problem is, so I figured I'd start here. I as having problems with Bacula stopping on 17Gig Volume sizes, so I decided to try to Just dd a 50 gig file. Sure enough, once the file hit 17 gigs dd stopped and spit out an error (pandora bacula)# dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1M count=50000 File size

Hi, I have awaited the new release inorder to use the -"-partial-dir" option. But after testing it seems that it does not behave like it says on the tin. It will correctly move and rename the interrupted file to the declared directory, but it will not attempt to use it when the client attempts to rsync the file again. I have a Solaris 8 box running as a server (Matthew), and another