similar to: Rsync using --daemon - how to specify port on client side for upload.

Good day, all, I'm trying to transfer a 174M file to a system with 1.2G free. Other files in the tree come over just fine, but this transfer dies partway through: rsync -avvz -e ssh --partial --progress server.with.the.file:/server/directory /local/directory opening connection using ssh server.with.the.file rsync --server --sender -vvlogDtprz --partial . /local/directory receiving file

Hi all, I keep getting the following error when trying to use ssh: (with rsync 2.5.7) [root@drone2 root]# rsync --rsh="ssh -lpaul" clinton:: paul@clinton's password: rsync: server sent "" rather than greeting rsync error: error starting client-server protocol (code 5) at main.c(1043) ...while using root works! ie, [root@drone2 root]# rsync --rsh="ssh

Hi!I'm working with 2 linux, with 2 IP;I want make a copy of some files inside one directory to the other linux.I called a file scriptx.sh in the first linux and this is the body: #!/bin/bash rsync -avvz --delete --rsh=ssh --stats /home/copia/ root@192.168.xxx.xx:/home/vrrp/dir/copia/ (xxx.xx are numbers...rights..only for security I crypted them) ok, then I create the crontab file with

All, The following websites will be moving to a new web server in the next few days: clang.llvm.org <http://clang.llvm.org/> clang-analyzer.llvm.org <http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/> compiler-rt.llvm.org <http://compiler-rt.llvm.org/> dragonegg.llvm.org <http://dragonegg.llvm.org/> klee.llvm.org <http://klee.llvm.org/> libclc.llvm.org <http://libclc.llvm.org/>

On 11/25/2010 12:59 PM, Andrew Clinton wrote: > On 11/24/2010 06:55 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: >> On Nov 23, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Andrew Clinton wrote: >> >> >>> Most of my programs contain loops that the LoopDeletion pass is unable >>> to remove. It appears that the following code in LoopDeletion.cpp:152 >>> is the culprit: >>> >>>

Hi all, Does anybody have a hint on what may be going wrong in this R code? I mimic the sample code from the MNP developers but I seem unable to get the choice specific variables right. Thanks, Joan Serra > rm(list=ls()) > library(foreign) > small<-read.spss("small.sav") Warning message: small.sav: Unrecognized record type 7, subtype 13 encountered in system file. >

Okay, here is the set up. I have Outlook set up to keep mail on the server for 5 days. At some point I started downloading all my mail that was on the server over and over again, even though I already have the mail. The weird thing is that it did not download all the mail, just a few. For example it would download 6 messages, then 18, then 12, etc! After I tried it a few times I had 50 of the same

I am trying to setup a way to watch each file that is created, updated, and deleted through samba. I have currently looked at inotify but I am not sure if that is the best way. What suggestions would you have to setup a way to get some type of event when one of these actions occur? I would like to watch a directory recursively and be able to run a shell script or perl script and that script know

Samba shares work for windows 7 and Server 2008, but XP and Server 2000 recieve the following error when trying to map samba shares: "The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed." tail -f /var/log/messages Apr 10 07:38:03 samba01 smbd[23581]:?? connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to open the domain client session to machine ad1.strat.com. Error

Okay see if you can see what I am doing wrong? Looking at the timestamp [root at ns3 sbin]# ls -la /usr/local/sbin/dovecot -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 471186 Nov 13 18:25 /usr/local/sbin/dovecot rebuilding [root at ns3 sbin]# /root/dovecot-0.99.11/configure --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var ...... [root at ns3 sbin]# make ...... [root at ns3 sbin]# sudo make install .... Looking at

On 11/24/2010 06:55 PM, Owen Anderson wrote: > On Nov 23, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Andrew Clinton wrote: > > >> Most of my programs contain loops that the LoopDeletion pass is unable >> to remove. It appears that the following code in LoopDeletion.cpp:152 >> is the culprit: >> >> ScalarEvolution& SE = getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>(); >>

On May 17, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Andrew Clinton wrote: > I have faced this same problem in my backend, and I'm working around it by providing a large physical register set. There are two problems with this: > > 1. There's a chance that the register allocator will run out of registers to assign, in which case the allocation will fail - making it necessary to retry with a larger

I'm the person who wrote it, and it's not really maintained, as we decided we wanted to go in a different direction long-term by having fewer passes making independent coalescing decisions rather than more. At the time I stopped working on it, it worked fine on x86 but caused problems with armv7 NEON code. If you file a PR with a test case, I am happy to take a quick look and try to fix

Hello, I'm not sure what you mean, could you elaborate? Thanks, -- -- -- Christopher T. Aloi USA Datanet - Technical Support Engineer 318 South Clinton Street Syracuse, NY 13202 C: (315) 569 4033 O: (315) 579 7074 E: caloi@usadatanet.com <mailto:caloi@usadatanet.com> -- -- -- _____ From: Wojciech Tryc [mailto:Wojciech.Tryc@pikatech.com] Sent: Friday,

Colin, Thanks for your assistance. Reading over your advice I seem to still be a bit confused. My agents are not on the Asterisk server; it appears in your advice that my the call will travel this path: WWW interface --> agent enters their DID, platform to use, and termination DID --> AST calls agent --> Agent calls termination DID If my agents are not on the Asterisk server

On 11/24/2010 03:36 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: > Andrew Clinton wrote: >> Most of my programs contain loops that the LoopDeletion pass is unable >> to remove. It appears that the following code in LoopDeletion.cpp:152 >> is the culprit: >> >> ScalarEvolution& SE = getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>(); >> const SCEV *S =

I will try to make a standalone test case but the one that is failing uses a custom back end, so it's not really portable. So is the plan to have the strong PHI elimination behavior rolled into other passes? Andrew On 06/20/2012 06:54 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote: > I'm the person who wrote it, and it's not really maintained, as we decided we wanted to go in a different direction

Andrew Clinton wrote: > Most of my programs contain loops that the LoopDeletion pass is unable > to remove. It appears that the following code in LoopDeletion.cpp:152 > is the culprit: > > ScalarEvolution& SE = getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>(); > const SCEV *S = SE.getMaxBackedgeTakenCount(L); > if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(S)) > return

On Feb 1, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Andrew Clinton wrote: > I have a (non-entry) basic block that contains only PHI nodes and an > unconditional branch (that does not branch to itself). Is it always > possible to merge this block with it's successor and produce a > semantically equivalent program? I'm trying to undo some of the loop > optimizations that LLVM has applied to my

I'm trying to work out LLVM code which generates something similar to the following when adding large multiword numbers stored as separate words: ADD x1 x1 ADC x2 y2 ADC x3 y3 etc, where such a three argument add like ADC on x86 (which includes a carry in the addition) is available as a machine op. The background to this is that I'm trying to implement fast multiword addition in