similar to: [Bug 1451] New: --copy-links not excluding files that match length and time

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1451 wayned@samba.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID ------- Additional Comments From wayned@samba.org 2004-06-10 09:46

Hi Lauro, On 14 Aug 2007, at 01:10, Lauro Ramos Venancio wrote: > Hi all, > > I did a performance test of two real applications (FFMPEG and GTK) on > ARM. For more details see: > http://laurovenancio.wordpress.com/2007/08/07/llvm-perf-tests/ Could you give me some more information about the applications you compiled and ran? Where can I obtain source codes, which input did

Hi Reid, On 06 Apr 2007, at 04:51, Reid Spencer wrote: > All, > > Just in case you missed the construction of these pages, I thought > you'd > like to know about these new ones: > > http://llvm.org/DevMtgMay2007.html > All the latest details on the 25th May Developer's meeting. Page > modified daily! Do you know if there are plans for any form of live

Hello all, I'm wondering if static compilation using llvm-gcc, i.e. including the library code (for example prinft) in the LLVM bytecode, is possible? I've tried adding the -static option to the llvm-gcc4 compiler, but that doesn't seem to change much (I got the same instruction count either with or without the option). Compiling and interpreting a small test program (hello world

Hi Chris, On 29 May 2007, at 19:15, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I set up a page to host the videos and slides from the meeting, and > uploaded all the videos: > http://llvm.org/devmtg/2007-05/index.html Wow, thanks! That was quicker than I expected... I will be watching every one of these in the next couple of days. One minor detail: the last video (Feedback),

On 05 Jul 2007, at 08:32, Chris Lattner wrote: > At this point, I'm interested in feedback and help. I've only > tried the > page with one browser, so it's entirely possible it looks like a > monkey's > armpit on other popular browsers. There is still a ton of missing > content > that needs to be filled in. The site also currently just includes >

Hello, On Jun 3, 2008, at 08:52 , Tanya Lattner wrote: > All, > > We are in desperate need of linux x86 testers (32 or 64 bit). If you > could set one up, the LLVM project would be very grateful. Right now > we have virtually no testers covering this platform. I think I might be able to set up a nightly tester for Linux x86 (32- bit). Although I've been following LLVM for

On 17 Apr 2008, at 20:39, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, HyperQuantum wrote: >> I have been wondering why llvm-ld generates the same code with or > without the option "-O5" so I looked at its source (llvm 2.2). And > apparently, the options "-On" are accepted but never used! The program > runs a fixed set of optimization passes, unless

Hi Scott, On 18 Mar 2007, at 04:22, Scott Fortmann-Roe wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that LLVM had signed up as a mentoring organization for > Google's summer of code. LLVM looks like an exciting project that > overlaps some of my interests. > > I would be interested in developing an additional front end for a > language it does not currently support (I'm open to

Hello, I'm trying to compile to SPEC CPU2000 suite to LLVM bytecode, using the llvm-test harness. I have tried this using: - both the 1.7 and 1.8 releases, without succes (and running into the same problems in both releases) - both the gcc3 and gcc4 frontends I'm working on Linux/x86. LLVM is configured using: ./configure --prefix=/path/to/bin/dir and compiled using gmake; gmake

Chris Lattner wrote: > Hacking on the interpreter is easy, but has several drawbacks. In > particular, the interpreter is very slow (even compared to other > interpreters) and it is missing functionality: you cannot call arbitrary > external functions, which causes many programs to fail in it. What do you mean by external functions? I only need to print stuff to file, the

John Criswell wrote: > You can compile library code into LLVM bytecode libraries and link them > with gccld. In general, LLVM provides tools equivalent to most of your > compiler tool chain (gccas, gccld, llvm-ar, llvm-nm, etc). You can, for > example, make an archive of LLVM bytecode files. > > The problem, in your case, is that no one has successfully compiled all >

On 31 Aug 2006, at 19:13, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > >> When I adjust the settings in Makefile.nagfortran as follows, I'm >> able to get bytecode file for lucas, galgel and facerec, but make >> still quits with an error (after generating >> bytecode files for 7 (out of 26) benchmarks. >> >> Also, the file

Dear all, Just today, I heard of the existence of the LLVM project. Because of its high activity and projects, I'm quite interested in it for using it in my research. Currently, we are comparing applications/programs/benchmarks by collecting characteristics of their dynamic behavior. This is done by instrumenting the program (using ATOM on Alpha), and subsequently running the program.

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> Chris Lattner wrote: >>> Hacking on the interpreter is easy, but has several drawbacks. In >>> particular, the interpreter is very slow (even compared to other >>> interpreters) and it is missing functionality: you cannot call >>> arbitrary external functions, which causes many

On 31 Aug 2006, at 07:58, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >>> $ grep F95 .../projects/llvm-test/Makefile.config >> >> -bash-3.00$ grep F95 projects/llvm-test/Makefile.config >> # F95: Enable LLVM to run Fortran benchmarks without a Fortran >> front-end >> USE_F95=1 >> F95_DIR := >> F95 :=

> I managed to solve this problem myself.... The problem was not correctly specifiying the SPEC CPU2000 source directory. configure says the dir was found, but that doesn't mean the sources will be found. For future reference: When you get the error: make[2]: *** No rule to make target `Output/accum.rbc', needed by `Output/177.mesa.linked.rbc'. Stop. You've probably

On 25 Nov 2006, at 09:02, Reid Spencer wrote: > Anyone know what to do about this: > > make[4]: Leaving directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/ > CFP2000/173.applu' > make[4]: Entering directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/ > CFP2000/178.galgel' > /usr/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /opt/spec/CPU2000v1.3.1/benchspec// > CFP2000/178.galgel/src/modules.f90

On 19 Mar 2007, at 13:33, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > I think getting a Fortran frontend working will highly benefit the > relevance of LLVM for researchers. Quite a few of the SPEC CPU2000 > and CPU2006 benchmarks are fully or partially written in Fortran, and > the SPEC benchmarks remain by far the most important benchmarks used > in computer architecture and compiler-related

On 30 Aug 2006, at 23:04, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >>> I use NAG with llvm-gcc4. What sort of errors do you get? Did >>> you configure llvm-test with the appropriate flags to find it? >> Yes, I did. llvm-test is configured as follows: (in /work/LLVM/ >> 1.8/ llvm/project/llvm-test): >> ./configure