similar to: rsync 2.6.2 doesn't work with GNU inetutils rsh

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1400 matches similar to: "rsync 2.6.2 doesn't work with GNU inetutils rsh"

2009 Jun 13
1
Linux, wine and lightroom
I'd love to tote a 'bells and whistles' sub-notebook though the ?800.00 plus price tag for a 10-12" screen machine which can effectively run XP or Vista and CS4 is too much considering I already own a large Tosh notebook (which I'm unwilling to haul overseas...) and two powerful desktops. So I'm considering a cheaper, less capable sub-notebook, perhaps something around
2011 Dec 18
0
Bug#652537: Please add rule for inetutils-syslogd
Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.69 The inetutils-syslogd (2:1.5.dfsg.1-9) package provides a system logging daemon. syslogd periodically logs the following message: Dec 17 00:29:11 host syslogd (GNU inetutils 1.5): restart The following logcheck rulefile works to filter the messages from the "System Events" email: # cat inetutils-syslogd ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ syslogd
2005 Sep 27
3
"missing secret for user" using cygwin rsync on Windows XP Home
Hi, I'm trying to set up rsync to allow me to backup a number of Windows machine to a Windows XP Home server using Nasbackup. I can get rsync working fine but have been struggling for days to get user authentication working. /var/log/rsyncd.log 2005/09/27 13:46:37 [1352] rsyncd version 2.6.6 starting, listening on port 873 2005/09/27 13:47:50 [4088] auth failed on module modulename from
2003 Sep 11
2
Connection refused
Dear sir, Having read all the descriptions of how easy it was to use rsync, I tried it for the replication of two servers. Testing rsync 10.0.1.4:/tmp/repl/ /tmp/repl I got the following error message (after a period which seemed to be a time-out): 10.0.1.4: Connection refused rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far) rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream
2003 Jan 05
6
Authenticating against a Windows 2000 DC?
I apologize in advance if this is a FAQ, but I couldn't find the FAQ document for this list. I also could not find anything relevant in other Samba documentation sources like http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/samba.html. There seems to be plenty of information about using Samba *as* a DC, but I want to know if I can use Samba *with* a Windows 2000 DC. We have two DCs running Windows 2000, a W2K
2008 Jul 11
2
[PATCH] contrib/cygwin/ssh-{host,user}-config
Hi, attached a total revamp of the ssh-host-config and ssh-user-config scripts. The underlying idea is that one of our maintainers has contributed a unified configuration script environment for Cygwin, called csih. This is now used by the below ssh config scripts as well. There's also an additional file called sshd-inetd, which is a service configuration file for inetutils. The Makefile
1997 Jan 12
9
dos-attack on inetd.
Hi. I don''t know if this one is known, but I can''t recall seeing anything about it. If it is old news I apologize. I discovered a bug in the inetd that comes with NetKit-B-0-08 and older. If a single SYN is sent to port 13 of the server, inetd will die of Broken Pipe: write(3, "Sun Jan 12 21:50:35 1997\r\n", 26) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe) --- SIGPIPE (Broken pipe) ---
1999 May 01
4
Bad smbclient put performance and smbfs write performance
Hi, I've had extremely bad smbclient put performance when connecting from my Linux box to a Windows 95 box. I only get about 10KBytes/s! All other forms of data transfer work fine, and I get from 600-700KBytes/s. This is on a local 10BT LAN. I've seen a few other reports of this, but no solutions as of yet. smbclient does puts just fine to another Linux/Samba Server. I'm using
2007 Sep 18
10
Routes
hi all, I want to move some routing tasks out of the router and into the controller. The goal is to make Merb feel less like mod_rewrite and give the user more control at the controller. The new Router is simple: it takes the path_info (not the whole request) then outputs a controller class and some parameters from the path matching. The rest of the routing would be done at the controller level.
2007 Mar 10
2
rsh with passwords
I am doing rsync over a private network. Encryption is not required. Currently rsync over ssh works, but requires too many CPU cycles (especially when doing a lot of transfers) on a CPU-bound system. I need to use rsh instead. The problem is, I can either set rsh to allow transfers without a password, or it won't let me transfer files at all. I need rsh to ask for a password. The network
2006 Feb 02
2
rsh/rlogin on CentOS4.2
Hello all, I'm not quite sure what has changed in the recent rsh commands, but I can't seem to get around the password promting. I need a clnk rsh between two machines in order to run my backup script. I added all the usual .rhosts with the proper permissions et al added the xinetd.d confilg files, opened ports 543 and 544 in my firewall, yet when I use the rsh commands, I get either a
2008 Jul 07
3
rsh problems in CentOS 5.2 (was "cvs command failure on 5.2")
Okay, I've narrowed the problem down quite a bit. As previously reported, in CentOS 5.2 I get this: $ cvs log Makefile poll: protocol failure in circuit setup cvs [log aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) Turns out this is a problem with rsh: $ rsh khan ls connect to address 10.24.15.48 port 544: Connection refused Trying krb4 rsh... connect to address
2018 Feb 28
2
Wide links and insecure wide links
Thank you. So, If I understand correctly, "ordinary" "wide links = yes", means Samba *will* traverse an existing symlink that points outside the root of the share, if permissions allow. However because it *also* disables SMB1 Unix extensions, it *also* prevents the user from creating or modifying symlinks on the share, so in wffect it inherently prevents this being
2002 Nov 18
3
[Bug 438] SFTP does not work for users with RSH shells
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438 ------- Additional Comments From mouring at eviladmin.org 2002-11-19 05:46 ------- if the user logs in and types /path/to/sftp-server does he/she get an error? If rsh is impeeding running the command then it is a rsh issue and not a sftp issue. - Ben ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or
2002 Jan 31
2
configure --with-rsh=CMD and default blocking-IO support
A while back I argued for adding a --with-rsh=CMD option to configure and got some general agreement that it would be a good thing (especially for systems that don't have rsh at all). However, the changes were never integrated into rsync. This patch adds the --with-rsh=CMD option to configure and modifies main.c to improve the blocking-IO setting code. The old code would set blocking_io to
2006 May 12
2
Usage of a telnet client instead of ssh or rsh
Hi all, i am building an authentification system based upon MIT kerberos. I set up a realm in which I can use the ftp and telnet server/clients infrastructure for the purpose of authentification. To backup my server i would like to use rsync, but instead of a ssh/rsh/stunnel with an encrypted kerberized telnet. My problem is, that i could connect manually via telnet.krb5, but if like to use it
2003 Dec 16
3
default --rsh
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:51:08AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 10:03:28AM -0800, jw schultz wrote: > > > The one thing i really would have liked to have seen in a version bump > > would have been changing the default remote shell to ssh instead of > > rsh/remsh. > > I can see this being both a good thing (since I think it is a better >
2002 Jun 24
1
remove --with-rsh
is this ok (complete, correct)? Index: INSTALL =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvs/openssh/INSTALL,v retrieving revision 1.53 diff -u -r1.53 INSTALL --- INSTALL 13 May 2002 05:22:21 -0000 1.53 +++ INSTALL 24 Jun 2002 00:50:20 -0000 @@ -105,11 +105,6 @@ There are a few other options to the configure script: ---with-rsh=PATH allows you to
2008 Jun 24
1
rsh issue/update (access denied)...
hi... i've got an "access denied" issue with rsh on one of my boxes (and before we start, no "use ssh" comments.. rsh is what i'm dealing with for now!!) i've got a few boxes in my network, and i can successfully rsh into them with no issue. however, on one box, i can't access it using rsh, and i'm running out of things to try... kind of curious. i can
2002 Apr 14
1
Update: WARNING: --rsh or -e option ignored when connecting to rsync daemon]
UPDATE i able to ssh between this 2 remote server, below is the extra info rsync -avue ssh . username@hostname::sharefolder WARNING: --rsh or -e option ignored when connecting to rsync daemon rsync: failed to connect to HOSTNAME: Connection timed out rsync error: error in socket IO (code 10) at clientserver.c(89) -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed...